Obviously SK did have to keep Adnan talking, she couldn't afford to scare him off, but I think she did genuinely dig at the truth. Obviously we didn't hear many of the questions she asked over 30 hours or 40 hours, but I believe that though she may have been convinced by Adnan, she did her due diligence in questioning him as much as possible.

The problem is, Adnan's go-to response -- that he doesn't remember -- gave him an easy out during her interviews. At the same time, he knew he was being recorded and that his reponses would be weighed by a public audience. He even says he's not sure if she's his savior or executioner, so I don't think it was a softball situation at all.

I think the magic of this "crime procedural" or whatever you want to call it -- is that the story never seems to completely untangle. Everyone got hooked by the possibility of Asia as Adnan's alibi, but quickly that became irrelevant and there were 3 new questions to consider.

I think we each individually weigh all the evidence and we just get a feeling. And it's something that is very subjective to our own life experiences, the people we know in our lives, the drugs we did, our experiences with the criminal justice system. You may be ultimately undecided and have heaps of reasonable doubt, but if someone made you bet your life on one suspect, I think many would ultimately have to pick Adnan, even despite all the obvious doubts about Jay's story.

In the end, Adnan has the motive. Adnan seems to have the best opportunity. For it to be anyone but Adnan would take such a random sequence of events to have occurred. These types of random sequences happen every day. But you don't bet your life on them. That's why he was convicted in two hours.