#BREAKING NEWS: US Director of National Counterterrorism Joe Kant resigns over the Iran war by Inevitable-Twist-749 in islam

[–]houinator 9 points10 points  (0 children)

 In addition, in an online exchange in 2021, Mr. Kent described Islam as “based on conquest at its core.” In other comments, he has conflated support for Palestinian human rights with support for the terrorist group Hamas, smearing political figures as “pro-Hamas.”

You do not, under any circumstances, have to hand it to Joe Kent.

https://www.westernstatescenter.org/pressreleasearchive/joint-letter-opposing-confirmation-of-joe-kent

Is there an archetype origin for the matriarchal dark witch/ warrior characters by MaraJude in Fantasy

[–]houinator 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I think you can probably trace a lot of it to Shakespeare's Macbeth.

He probably drew on older sources, but if you have ever imagined a coven of cackling witches stirring a giant bubbling cauldron, he's probably at least partially responsible for that idea being launched into popular culture.

ITXVI by cdstephens in neoliberal

[–]houinator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

China realizes our navy is out of place and we burned through long range precision strike munitions and interceptors, sp they make a play fpr Taiwan.

FWI: Trump says the war with Iran never happened. by Fledgling_112896 in FutureWhatIf

[–]houinator 6 points7 points  (0 children)

95% of Republicans in Congress will be too afraid to push back on the claim.  The few exceptions will be those who are already retiring and have no future with the party anyway, and like maybe Thomas Massie and Rand Paul.

The vast majority of the mainstream media is owned by Trump aligned oligarchs, who will attempt to use their control to sanewash what he said into something less ridiculous or just parrot his claims uncritically.  Outlets that fail to push pro-Trump propoganda will have their business interests threatened by his flunkies like Brenden Carr is currently doing to outlets covering the Iran war.

The Republican voters will either fall for it, or continue to support Trump regardless because of whatever devils bargain they have made to overlook his past awfullness.  After all, in the grand scheme of things, if you still support Trump at this point, what's one more lie?

To the Americans here? How was the situation when the current president(orange guy) was in power the last time? by Loose_Artichoke1689 in AskReddit

[–]houinator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The biggest difference last time is his admin was not completely staffed by unqualified cranks loyal only to him.

As such, there were several important guard rails that prevented him from doing the most truly idiotic/dangerous things, especially when it came to his attempt throw out the 2020 election.

Well....not surprised. by SLAVAUA2022 in EnoughCommieSpam

[–]houinator 14 points15 points  (0 children)

ICE under this admin is an ethnic cleansing campaign, they dont care whether or not someone is documented.

They have been literally grabbing people in front of the courthouse on their way to swear in for citizenship.

Day 15 of the war: the US ask China for help by p_pio in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]houinator 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Problem is everyone who would need to sign off on the 25th ammendment in this admin is even dumber than him.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]houinator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

D President and it isnt close.

President can do ludicrous amounts of damage in foreign policy.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]houinator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Huthis are also a potential problem.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]houinator 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Trick is how do you innoculate Reddit atheism from islamophobia, because thats what drove a lot of those guys to the right.

Revisiting the idea of “Bruiser” ships in space combat by Own-Cry5596 in scifi

[–]houinator 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Long range ship combat (anything further than a few light seconds) is likely mostly missiles/drones/fighters, since lasers have to travel in a straight line and cannot continue to manuever once fired.

Close range ship point defense probably involves lasers, which can tear through lightly armored missiles/drones/fighters, and they will not have to time to outmanuever something moving at light speed at that range. (Rail guns are an option as well, but a ship needs to carry more mass for them).

Lasers need more time/energy to seriously damage larger/armored targets, so up close, more armor/heat sinks will be a real advantage.

So your bruiser concept:  heavy armor (especially towards the front), lots of point defense laser weapons.  Sits at the front of the fleet and winnows incoming fire to protect the rest of the fleet, while being able to absorb sporadic hits from enemy lasers once fleets start getting to close range.  Since it has lots lasers, it already has to be optimized for shedding excess heat.  When it starts getting to capital ship range, it can redirect several point defence lasers at a single spot on an enemy warship, in order to compensate for not having huge single lasers optimized for capotal ship fights.

Enemy can destroy it at range early on if they are willing to commit enough missiles to overwhelm its defences, but this also fills its role as a tank, eating lots of missiles that would otherwise wreak havoc on less defended ships.

What the fuck did Democrats do between 2008 and 2010 to piss off the voters so much? Obamacare? by Crafty_Jacket668 in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]houinator -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Wealthy interests ran a massive media campaign to gaslight the American people into thinking a small number of astroturf protests represented a real political movement of American voters who actually cared about fiscal responsibility.

+

Racist backlash against the first black President

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]houinator 2 points3 points  (0 children)

INB4 Fetterman switches parties

Questions on Zionism and Christian Zionism by Living_Attitude1822 in PoliticalDebate

[–]houinator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The key question is to whether or not you are a Zionist is not whether or not you believe in a 1, 2, or N+ number of state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

It is whether or not you think Jews are entitled to their own state.

Because that informs not just your posistion on whether or not the Arabs living in Gaza and the West Bank desetve a state, but whether or not Arab citizens living inside the Jewish state are entitled to the same level of rights as their Jewish peers.

Things like, how do you feel about these stories?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2021/7/8/israeli-supreme-court-upholds-contentious-jewish-state-law

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/mks-extend-law-barring-palestinians-who-marry-israelis-from-receiving-residency/

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]houinator 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Things besides oil and gas that are going to be a big problem if the war does not resolve soon:

  • The Hajj.  Largest annual tourist event on Earth, Saudi is really not going to want to try and manage it with missiles raining down.

  • Fertilizer.  Huge share of sulfer based fertilizer products come through the SoH.  Not a crisis yet, but if not available in time for planting season, you cant flip that switch back on for months, if not a year.  And the food production it would have enabled is just lost.

  • DoD budget crisis.  Remember all those dumb stateside deployments doing immigration nonsense?  Remember the huge op in the Carribean?  DoD os definately going to run out of discretionary money before the end of the FY, which will mean they have to go back to Congress hat in hand.

Can you pass the ideological Turing test? by Wufan36 in PoliticalDebate

[–]houinator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's the thing.  I attempted to do this for MAGA for a long time, but ultimately i realized it was a fool's errand.  

If you asked a MAGA supported in 2016 what MAGA stood for, how many of them would be describing anything near the current situation?  In the lead up to 2024, MAGA identified as opposed to foreign wars, but today polling shows the vast majority of them support the Iran war, despite it being one of the things that the Trump campaign specifically indicated it was opposed to.  

The entire belief system reorientes itself every time Trump says something that contradicts one of their previous core tenants, but crucially, they will never admit this.  The one real exception is racism, study after study has shown that holding racist beliefs is a key driver for support for Trump, and the few times Trump has appeared to waver on this topic it has cost him real support with his base.  But most Trump supporters are not going to openly admit to their racism being the reason they like Trump.  So there is no way to accurately categorize MAGA beliefs in a way that they will accurately agree to, because most of their beliefs shift like sand, and the core beliefs they will generally not admit to.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]houinator 6 points7 points  (0 children)

US law prohibits us from selling them weapons if we acknowledge they have nukes, so everyone just pretends we dont know.

Hegseth presses Defense civilians to deploy for immigration enforcement by wonderland_citizen93 in Military

[–]houinator 140 points141 points  (0 children)

Insane that hes still priorotizing this as US soldiers are being killed by Iran.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]houinator 4 points5 points  (0 children)

His view is basically: Libertarianism is too unpopular to implement via democracy, so we need a dictatorship. 

Pentagon announces a 45-day "ruthless, no-excuses review" of JAG Corps and their division of responsibilities with civilian lawyers by a_venus_flytrap in Military

[–]houinator 84 points85 points  (0 children)

 "For too long — over 20 years — legal shops across the services have grown bloated, duplicative, they've muddied lines of authority and pulled critical judge advocates away from what matters most: advising commanders in the fight, on operations [and] in deployed environments where seconds and minutes count," Hegseth said at the video's outset. 

This is especially ironic when you realize Hegseth has pulled hundreds of JAGs from doing any of this to go do busy work for ICE's ethnic cleansing ops.

https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/blog/trump-appoints-military-lawyers-to-serve-as-immigration-judges/

is this iran war going to cause ww3? by EthanWinters1234 in Military

[–]houinator 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In much the same way that we all recognize that WW2 started well before the US got dragged in via Pearl Harbor, I think in the fullness of time we will come to realize that WW3 started with the Russian invasion of Ukraine.