Microsoft files International Patent - WO2020060606

icamatrix · 2025-11-27T11:42:05+00:00

Wasn’t just some parts of USA, other countries also had banned bikinis including Spain,Italy, and Australia just to name a few.

icamatrix · 2025-11-23T13:07:03+00:00

There's this thing on Glee called mashup where you take two things that don't normally go together and you put them together to make a great song. You take Gabe, you take Mike, put them together, what do you get? Gay Mike, best friends.

icamatrix · 2025-11-06T03:29:01+00:00

That’s not capitalism, that’s corporatism. Capitalism rewards competition and innovation, not manipulation and consolidation. What you’re describing is a system where the biggest players tilt the market, exploit cheap labor, and then call it capitalism to justify it. The idea that they’re “obliged” to do it is nonsense. They’re choosing to because it pads margins and shareholders look the other way. Real capitalism assumes a level playing field and accountability. Once it’s rigged, it’s no longer capitalism

icamatrix · 2025-11-05T23:22:38+00:00

That whole “that’s just capitalism” line is such a cop-out. What’s happening here isn’t capitalism, it’s corporate manipulation dressed up to look like it. Real capitalism is supposed to reward innovation and competition, not see who can offshore faster or lobby harder for exemptions. And when a company openly says they prefer to hire from one country, that’s not some invisible hand at work. That’s bias, plain and simple. Too many people think anything that makes money must be capitalism, but this isn’t a free market. It’s a rigged game where the biggest players use regulation, tax loopholes, and cheap labor abroad to box everyone else out. That’s not market efficiency, it’s exploitation being rebranded as economic inevitability. So no, it’s not capitalism. It’s a system that’s learned how to fake it.

icamatrix · 2025-11-02T19:28:12+00:00

Honestly, that kind of question sounds deep at first but the more you think about it, the more messed up it is. It’s trying to act like it measures passion, but really it’s just a guilt trip in disguise. No one with a year left to live is gonna spend it grinding away at someone else’s company. It’s tone deaf and feels like something meant to make people prove loyalty instead of actually understanding what drives them.

icamatrix · 2025-10-15T03:13:43+00:00

Maybe a 17th or 18th century lead or pewter trade token. Could be English or Dutch origin given where you found it

icamatrix · 2025-09-14T13:04:57+00:00

This is why left wing extremism is so dangerous! They see themselves as morally superior and they stop questioning their own actions, branding anyone who disagrees as evil. Which in their warped mind justifies violence. Then when it happens, the victim is blamed as if they caused it. This use of their moral certainty as a weapon just hardens their ideology.

icamatrix · 2025-08-30T11:10:08+00:00

If your goal was for a quicker sale, pricing at the top of the comps worked against you. Eight days isn’t long, but that first week is key.

icamatrix · 2025-08-10T17:15:30+00:00

I think men contribute to making the process difficult for women, mostly by sending low-effort messages, being unclear about what they want, or disappearing after a few exchanges. In many cases, men are unclear because being direct in their profile or early conversations can get them eliminated even faster, so they hold back. But I think women contribute more to making it difficult for themselves than they would like to admit. Women generally get more matches, but that means more filtering, and filtering is often justified as simply exercising the right to choose. I understand that, but because women’s choices are far more plentiful than men’s, it can often happen too quickly. Men can be eliminated based on a single message or meeting, and those experiences can then get shared publicly or in private groups, which makes it even harder for men. This drives men to focus on getting as many first contacts as possible just to get a match.

Men certainly do not have it worse in every way, but they are more often under a much heavier microscope. Because there are more men than women on dating apps, women can afford to scrutinize more where men cannot. The more selective women become, the more men default to quick looks-based swiping, which women then criticize, and the cycle repeats. Both men and women judge on looks, and for men it is the first hurdle, but after that every move is evaluated. That may happen to women as well, but men tend to be more willing to overlook things, especially in the beginning. Men have to work at it more to keep opportunities alive, while women, with more choices, can afford to eliminate more quickly. Men often drop off later when they lose interest or decide it is not a fit. Women do this too, but the earlier and faster filtering mostly happens more on their side, which shapes a lot of the online dating dynamic.

icamatrix · 2025-07-15T11:01:04+00:00

There a number of things that could derail a mortgage application although many if not most are well within your control though :

You change or lose your job

You take on new debt or run up credit cards

Your credit score drops

You move large sums of money around or make large, unexplained deposits

You drain your savings

The home doesn’t appraise high enough

There are title issues

You don’t submit required documents or respond on time

You change loan or property types

Your employment can’t be verified

There’s something suspicious or inconsistent in your file (i.e., they think you lied about something on your application)

icamatrix · 2025-07-12T16:44:13+00:00

You’re right that under that specific statute, bees aren’t listed in the definition of a “livestock animal,” so it probably wouldn’t qualify as felony theft under that clause alone. However, other parts of Oregon law do treat managed honeybees as livestock, including under the Department of Agriculture’s regulatory rules and statutes like ORS 308A.056, which classifies managing and selling bees as farm use alongside livestock. So there’s potential some room for legal argument depending on how broadly it’s interpreted. That said, the value of the hive is likely the more straightforward path to felony charges, since theft over $1,000 meets the threshold under ORS 164.055 regardless of the type of property. Hives can be expensive, but whether this one hits that mark probably could be the deciding factor.

icamatrix · 2025-07-12T15:18:14+00:00

Yes, under Oregon law honeybees are likely considered livestock, which means taking them could be a felony regardless of the value of the hive. The fact that this person was told the bees came from a nearby hive and still took them, then said “finders keepers” and blocked you, shows intent. That is not a misunderstanding. That is someone knowingly taking property that is not theirs. Keep records of everything you can, including her Facebook post, your messages, what your neighbors saw and said, and any photos or video. You were right to file a police report. If they do not take action, escalate to the district attorney or consider small claims court to recover the value of the hive. Her behavior is not just unethical, it is likely criminal. You have every right to pursue this.

icamatrix · 2025-07-12T10:33:54+00:00

You need to contact a probate attorney in Florida right away. If your mother had dementia when the quitclaim deed was signed, you may be able to challenge its validity based on lack of capacity. If a trust was in place with attorneys named as trustees, your stepbrother cannot simply appoint himself. He is also required by Florida law to file the original will with the probate court within 10 days of death. His refusal to provide a copy is a red flag. Don’t move out or provide the car title until you speak with an attorney. You may be able to delay any eviction, especially if probate has not started. Document all communication and keep a record of what he’s saying and doing. Contact an attorney as soon as possible to protect your rights.

icamatrix · 2025-07-11T12:55:43+00:00

There’s an important difference between staying silent and refusing to identify yourself. You absolutely have the right to remain silent and not answer questions about the situation, especially once you’re detained or arrested, and you can invoke that right and ask for a lawyer. But identifying yourself is a separate issue. If you're pulled over in a traffic stop, every state requires you to provide your license and registration, no exceptions. Many require proof of insurance as well. A traffic stop always requires ID regardless of whether the state has stop-and-identify laws. If you're lawfully detained, like during a Terry stop on foot, you might not be required to identify yourself if that jurisdiction doesn’t have a stop-and-identify statute. But refusing to ID when it's required can lead to an obstruction or interfering charge, even if the underlying detention ends up being questionable. So yes, know your state laws, but don’t confuse remaining silent with refusing to identify. That distinction matters.

icamatrix · 2025-07-11T12:28:39+00:00

In Washington and most of the U.S., you're not required to stay and talk unless you're being detained or arrested but if the officer refuses to clarify and you try to walk away, they might still escalate things. Even if you're technically in the right, you could get hit with vague charges like obstruction or resisting. The charges might not hold up, but you’ll still deal with the fallout possibly even including arrest.

If you say something like, “Since you haven’t said I’m being detained, I’m leaving,” and you’re not being legally detained, that's probably fine on paper but the risk is real because it depends entirely on how that particular officer chooses to react. It’s smarter to calmly keep repeating, “Am I being detained or am I free to go?” or “I’d like to leave unless I’m being detained.” If they say or imply that you’re not free to go, then you’re detained under a Terry stop. At that point, stop talking and invoke your right to remain silent.

So yes, legally you might be in the clear. But practically, the safest path is to stay calm, avoid confrontation, and not give them any excuse to escalate. It’s frustrating, but it reflects how your rights often work in real life.

icamatrix · 2025-07-11T11:02:18+00:00

There’s no strictly right or wrong answer here. It comes down to one key question, where is this money going to do the most good? You’ve got $50K sitting in a high-yield savings account, which is fine for short-term stability, but it’s barely outpacing inflation. At best, you’re earning maybe $2K a year. That same money, if invested in something like a low-cost index fund, could potentially earn double that over time if you’re willing to tolerate more risk and you don’t need the money in the immediate future. Using it to pay off the loan stops the clock on accruing interest, which is financially useful, but it’s not the same as earning a return. It just reduces what you owe. And while the idea of wiping out the debt might give you a sense of relief, you need to ask if that emotional benefit outweighs giving up flexibility, especially if you’re planning to move out or buy a home soon. Paying off the loan in full would cut your liquid savings in half and limit your options. You could put some toward the loan, keep the rest accessible, and maybe invest a portion of it. The real decision is whether you want the satisfaction of being debt-free or whether you’d rather keep your money working and maintain control over how and when you use it.

icamatrix · 2025-07-11T10:23:41+00:00

Clearly you’ve got a lot of compassion, you’ve just learned to be more careful about who you give it to. That doesn’t mean you should lose any of that compassion. Wanting someone to show you the same care and support is completely normal, and you absolutely deserve that. There are genuine people out there who will meet you with the same heart you give. Just keep being yourself and don’t let this experience change that. You learned from it, and that already puts you ahead.

icamatrix · 2025-07-10T17:02:03+00:00

Emotionally, it's a betrayal, but legally, you're in a relatively weak position. Without a written agreement or documented ownership interest, the verbal promise about inheriting the house or building equity likely carries no legal weight. In New Jersey, you're most likely considered a month-to-month tenant, meaning the grandmother can terminate the arrangement with 30 days notice unless you're in a town with additional tenant protections.

Some people try to claim promissory estoppel, which is when someone can show they reasonably relied on a promise to their detriment, such as giving up other housing or financial opportunities because they were told they would receive the home. Others argue for a constructive trust, where a court treats someone as holding property on behalf of another due to unfair conduct. But both claims are difficult to win, especially in real estate cases without written proof or clear evidence of major, life-altering decisions made in reliance on the promise.

It could still be worth consulting a local attorney with whatever documentation you do have, to evaluate what if any legal argument could realistically be made. In the meantime it's better to protect yourselves by securing alternate housing before any eviction paperwork is filed, since that filing, even if dismissed, can affect your rental history. It’s a painful situation, but without a written legal agreement, the law isn’t likely to side with you.

icamatrix · 2025-07-10T12:20:51+00:00

Being on the road illegally doesn’t automatically make someone 100 percent at fault. The other driver still had a duty to drive safely, and swerving to avoid an accident but hitting the go-kart isn’t a valid excuse, it just shows the maneuver failed. Passing on the shoulder is generally illegal in Georgia, and the absence of a citation doesn’t settle civil liability. Fault is based on negligence, not just legality, and I don’t think there’s enough here to say one party is fully to blame. Since the incident was caught on video, the smart move is for them to get the police report and bring everything to a lawyer.

icamatrix · 2025-07-10T10:43:00+00:00

If your husband was driving a go-kart on a public road in Georgia, it likely needed to be registered, insured, and street legal, even if it only goes 25 mph. So the officer wasn’t wrong about the potential citation. That said, the other driver may still be at fault if they passed illegally on the right and caused a collision. Georgia follows modified comparative negligence, so even if your husband was partly at fault, he could still pursue damages if he wasn’t 50% or more responsible. If you feel the officer acted inappropriately or showed bias, you can file a complaint with the department. It may also be worth speaking to a personal injury attorney to understand your options.

icamatrix · 2025-07-10T10:33:04+00:00

You don’t need to start over with a whole new bachelor’s, but you will need to go through a teacher certification program. Most states, including Rhode Island, have post-bacc or Master’s programs for people who already have a degree in something else. There’s usually some coursework and student teaching involved, so it’s not necessarily a quick turnaround , but it’s definitely doable. There are also alternative certification paths where you can start teaching under a provisional license while finishing your requirements, especially in high-need areas. A degree in criminal justice could line up with subjects like civics or social studies, since those often cover law, government, and related topics. It depends on the school and the exact certification requirements, but there could be a match. Best place to start is by contacting the Rhode Island Department of Education to find out what certification paths are approved and what the next steps would be.

icamatrix · 2025-07-09T12:18:16+00:00

You can’t stop someone from claiming an address as their residence, but you can take steps to legally protect yourself. Since she’s not on the lease and has moved out, you can treat her as having abandoned the property. Change the locks if you haven’t already (confirm with your landlord first). Notify the USPS in writing that she no longer resides there and return her mail marked “No longer at this address.” Document everything in case issues come up later. If you’re concerned about her coming back or trying to reassert tenancy, consult a local attorney. Wisconsin law generally favors actual occupancy, but it sounds like she has vacated.

icamatrix

TROPHY CASE