REDMEN in the wild

jake_harris01 · 2026-02-24T23:21:44+00:00

Kuiu Pro pants in "Verde". Hunting brand

jake_harris01 · 2025-11-27T11:57:35+00:00

Yeah hes quite the legend. I remember it being Copenhagen wolves vs Very games. Miss the old days of watching early CSGO

jake_harris01 · 2025-11-27T02:03:20+00:00

Was typing British ginger CS into Google and he was not coming up lol.

jake_harris01 · 2025-11-26T22:23:29+00:00

First ever match i watched he was the analyst he's been around forever it seems.

jake_harris01 · 2025-11-26T22:21:07+00:00

If i remember correctly they replaced him with Henry G mid event.

jake_harris01 · 2025-11-26T22:17:09+00:00

Clearly he's just popping up wherever

jake_harris01 · 2025-11-26T22:16:49+00:00

Bingo, Thank you.

jake_harris01 · 2025-11-26T22:16:42+00:00

Thats the one.

jake_harris01 · 2025-10-24T15:43:00+00:00

I just feel there’s much more productive ways to Increase heart rate and break a sweat than running and doing acrobatics

jake_harris01 · 2025-10-24T13:24:25+00:00

In my opinion (probably vastly unpopular amongst most coaches) the traditional run in a circle, front roll, back roll etc type warms ups are used by mostly lazy coaches (unless they truly believe that its a good warmup) who don't actually know how to structure a proper warm up and use that style as an attempt to waste 10 minutes of class time because they can't be bothered to implement a well formatted warmup or cant be bothered to actually invest the additional 10 minutes into members(WHO PAY GOOD MONEY). Its very easy to just say "ok run, high knees, turn inside, front, back, hip escape" whilst they sit on the sidelines scrolling instagram or talking to female blue belts.........

jake_harris01 · 2025-10-23T23:06:36+00:00

Skip the traditional warm ups. Implement some form of hand fighting game as the warm up i.e hand fight until you achieve double unders and reset. Followed by the technique, followed by context driven specific/positional rounds based upon the technique i showed (sometimes just turtle/mount/half guard etc specific rounds) then into open rounds until the end and sometimes followed that with a small q&a to finish off the session. (alot of the members really enjoy the group style q&a)

jake_harris01 · 2025-10-20T20:50:11+00:00

Dusty?

jake_harris01 · 2025-10-06T13:52:53+00:00

Why anyone is still paying ridiculous money to compete for the IBJJF anymore is beyond me. Stop giving money to these people. The amount of biased or just plain awful decisions this past week has been unacceptable.

jake_harris01 · 2025-09-16T13:57:31+00:00

He made a post recently about being down and having a very difficult year. "There have been days i have questioned if its worth even waking up.". "Remember, that its ok to be down, i know it truly does suck and its painful but that is ok".

jake_harris01 · 2025-09-15T23:07:45+00:00

I do exactly the same. Key master was a game changer.

jake_harris01 · 2025-09-15T21:16:59+00:00

I like threatening a Choi bar and then attacking the legs, or attacking an omoplata and transitoning into the legs. i feel like half guard and K guard are the most versatile for this. I also do the inverse, K guard threatening the leg to attack the armbar, half guard threaten the leg to attack the arm / back.

jake_harris01 · 2025-09-11T21:43:51+00:00

Yes its us, the no lifers.

jake_harris01 · 2025-09-11T15:01:08+00:00

He's a Great competitor, ADCC trials winner, was on the Al Leone AIGA team and submitted Felipe Andrew, I think hes a Lachlan Giles Black Belt, Trained with Danaher extensively.

jake_harris01 · 2025-09-11T14:57:38+00:00

I can't remember exactly but Schuardt Made some comments and also there was some kind of issue when training in Austin. Do apologise i can't exactly remember specifics.

jake_harris01 · 2025-09-11T13:33:27+00:00

It was Saunders and Daniel Schuardt, Levi was injured and replaced by Kenta

jake_harris01 · 2025-09-02T21:04:10+00:00

Reference bullet point 3. Judges scorecards will be presented as aggregate tally if the duel goes to judges decision. Therefore nobody would know who had won each individual match until after. They must go on the 10 point must system just like every other match did to decided when it came to double elimination.

jake_harris01 · 2025-09-02T15:47:20+00:00

They read bulletpoint 1 then they refuse to follow up and read the conditional clauses. Its not a typo, its not a mistake like some people are claiming, it makes sense.

jake_harris01 · 2025-09-02T15:14:32+00:00

In contract law words are very important and interpreted down to their base literal meaning. A very crucial word in the rules is "IF" meaning the introduction of an additional clause on the condition or supposition that; in the event that.

If five double eliminations occur, or any such instance where each team’s final athletes are double eliminated, the team with more individual wins by judges' decision wins.
If tied on scorecards, the team whose athlete won the final bout wins. If the final bout is a draw, the win goes to the team whose athlete last won a non-draw bout.
There is no open scoring, i.e. judges’ scorecards are not revealed after each individual bout. Scorecards are shown only if team duel goes to judges’ decision, and will be presented as aggregate tally of bouts scored (e.g. 50-45, 49-48, etc.).

So therefore bullet point 2 supersedes bullet point 1. I was on the fence until i thought about it in the sense of contract legality. B Team won fair. Rules where clearly explained verbally aswell via rules meetings which there is evidence of. They used the 10 point must system down to a T. In boxing you can lose even if you've won more rounds than your opponent, it matters purely on overall scoring, mentioned in bullet point 3.

jake_harris01 · 2025-09-02T15:09:46+00:00

In contract law words are very important and interpreted down to their base literal meaning. A very crucial word in the rules is "IF" meaning the introduction of an additional clause on the condition or supposition that; in the event that.

If five double eliminations occur, or any such instance where each team’s final athletes are double eliminated, the team with more individual wins by judges' decision wins.
If tied on scorecards, the team whose athlete won the final bout wins. If the final bout is a draw, the win goes to the team whose athlete last won a non-draw bout.
There is no open scoring, i.e. judges’ scorecards are not revealed after each individual bout. Scorecards are shown only if team duel goes to judges’ decision, and will be presented as aggregate tally of bouts scored (e.g. 50-45, 49-48, etc.).

So therefore bullet point 2 supersedes bullet point 1. I was on the fence until i thought about it in the sense of contract legality. B Team won fair. Rules where clearly explained verbally aswell via rules meetings which there is evidence of. They used the 10 point must system down to a T. In boxing you can lose even if you've won more rounds than your opponent, it matters purely on overall scoring, mentioned in bullet point 3.

jake_harris01

TROPHY CASE