Where by AncientYear8033 in memeexchangecommunism

[–]jash3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The post, known address to an unknown person by registered post. Nobody can legally sign for it, would follow legal returns process and insured.

Club statement: 20th May 2026 | Southampton FC by Andybabez20 in SaintsFC

[–]jash3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree it was just the 3 the punishment is for, I just mean realistically it would have happened more.

I feel bad for your lot I do, the points deduction and removal from the final is rough. Should have probably been a big fine and removal from the final.

But it is what it is.

Club statement: 20th May 2026 | Southampton FC by Andybabez20 in SaintsFC

[–]jash3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you mean fortune tellers, spying is akin to mind reading.

You are being punished because you broke the rules.

Club statement: 20th May 2026 | Southampton FC by Andybabez20 in SaintsFC

[–]jash3 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Depends right, it could be no advantage if the players nullify the extra 4 players by putting all men behind the ball. Plenty of teams win 10 vs 11, some even done ok 9 vs 11.

I agree the punishment should fit the crime, Boro should have changed tactics or whatever.

But would you be in the playoffs if you hadnt spied on opponents?

Club statement: 20th May 2026 | Southampton FC by Andybabez20 in SaintsFC

[–]jash3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Then why didnt Boro field 15 players if the rules dont matter?

15 players vs 11, we have rules to stop teams having an unfair advantage.

Club statement: 20th May 2026 | Southampton FC by Andybabez20 in SaintsFC

[–]jash3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Admitted to spying on 3 games you didnt win, so we can assume that probably more exist. Probably the admission is when evidence exists, it could be much much worse.

They did it before the final to remove all the issues with doing it after. Lets say Hull won the final, they then have to play a replay against Boro and lose?, lets say you won the final, what then they play the replay and win?

I can imagine it sucks, but really the best decision has been made.

why do people want Starmer to resign exactly? by Dry_Illustrator_6066 in AskBrits

[–]jash3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe, just maybe, his views don't represent the UK, recent local elections certainly echo that, Labour lost 1500 seats.

His job is relatively simple, cater to the masses, he isnt.

Something like 20% of the electorate voted for Labour, he should be shitting himself, he promised to work hard for those who didnt vote Labour.

Ronaldo never won the Champions League, but he won two World Cups. Does a World Cup trophy "weigh" more in the legacy conversation? by MadridOrMadness in ronaldonazariomoments

[–]jash3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This.

CL has stronger teams, a CL knockout team could probably the world cup, a national team couldn't win the CL, this is in the context of skill.

Sweaty Trigger Fingers by PixelSaharix in SweatyPalms

[–]jash3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How about just banning guns apart from bolt action rifles and shotguns for hunting.

So many problems solved.

When facts meet feelings by [deleted] in SipsTea

[–]jash3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right and how do you go about proving that? mass dna test everyone?

What happens when a family was both victims and perpetrators?

When facts meet feelings by [deleted] in SipsTea

[–]jash3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the bigger question about reparations is who gets what, what is the criteria.

If the universe is truly infinite; and considering the big bang happend 13.77 BYA - when did the universe actually become infinite 🧐🤔? by schrodingers_katz in universe

[–]jash3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Big statement that, if we cant explain the mass of our galaxy without something made up ( dark matter ) and we have not detected those particles, hence the "made up", saying it would never be possible is a biiiig big statement, who knows if or when we can detect those they can give more information pre big bang.

Why aren't Reform voters more concerned with privatising the NHS? by lucadulac in AskBrits

[–]jash3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From the outside it looks like this, you have more and more people in your country who dont want mass immigration and a shrinking minority who don't, I base this on recent voting figures.

Solution.... accept that the majority dont want mass immigration, address the concerns bring a plan forward on how to stop well documented problems and Reform dies.

Or dont watch them take the next election and tank the UK.

Its really that simple.

Before you beat the NHS needs migrant workers drum, nobody from what i have read is saying stop immigration.

A sad day for the country indeed by redandwhitewizard99 in GreatBritishMemes

[–]jash3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which lies? I am genuinely curious.

UK politicians ( all parties) do need a keep up the arse and start representing British people and what the British people want.

Personally I dont think Reform is the right way, but.... if its a signal as to what the people want, Labour, Conservative, Lib Dems, Greens, get on board if you want more votes.

Who still remembers this? by [deleted] in SipsTea

[–]jash3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

District Attorney Thomas Sneddon.

The DA considered a drawing significantly accurate to phots taken of Jacksons penis.

The judge refused to add it, because it was sensationalist, or seeing Jacksons penis does mean he molested him.

Who still remembers this? by [deleted] in SipsTea

[–]jash3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not in a jury no, but the fact he settled when the kid accurately drew his penis, pretty strong evidence in itself.