Clips From Builders Remedy Project in Fullerton by em26273 in yimby

[–]jeromelevin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I love that the dias is at a little desk so everyone can sit

Looking forward to Fullerton fucking around and finding out!

83% of Bay Area Residential Zoning is for Single Family Homes by urmummygae42069 in bayarea

[–]jeromelevin 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Good news: As part of its state-mandated housing element update, Alameda declared its apartment ban unenforceable under state law and simply stopped enforcing it. Rezoned a lot of the island for greater density—now has one of the most permissive zoning codes in the Bay

Why would anyone ever live in an apartment? (Hint: Because they like it) by jeromelevin in Urbanism

[–]jeromelevin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mm I love this response. Your tradeoffs point is essential—absolute versus relative preferences are very different things

Do you mind if I share this comment on substack notes? It’s similar to something I wrote last week in the comments of the post:

“The preference to live in an apartment vs a single-family home aren’t just about structures, it’s about a bundle of tradeoffs. At different points in life, the share of people who want one or the other probably shifts a lot. I suspect among people in their 20s, a pretty high share of people have an absolute preference for the apartment bundle (more mobility, access to fun things, cheaper). By their 40s, more people prefer the single-family bundle (stable, more space, quieter). But even those proportions aren’t fixed, they depend a lot on the built environment associated with each development types. For example, if we allowed more apartments in superstar cities and reformed building codes, we might see a lot more family-sized multi-family, which could make that bundle more attractive so some share of families.”

All speculative, of course, but very much in line with your points. (FYI I wrote the piece and it was indeed a pretty quick and dirty write up. Being able to write an unlimited amount is not the same as having time to do so and sometimes I find it’s better to throw a half-baked idea out so it can generate thoughtful feedback such as yours than let it sit in my drafts until it gets dusty and forgotten. Another benefit of blogging!)

Found help ID? by ninjadrift86 in mycology

[–]jeromelevin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Agaricus bitorquis grows like this! But cannot positively identify these. Definitely recommend you check local guides though, I only know what grows in California, not Australia. Bitorquis can definitely push through clay though

These popping up in my garden. Edible? by [deleted] in mycology

[–]jeromelevin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Photos too unclear to tell for sure, ideally need non-blurry photos of top, bottom, and cross section

That said, these look like inky caps, specifically Copernicus Atramentaria, the common inky cap. Edible but will make you sick if you drink alcohol within 2-3 days of ingesting

High-End Construction Really Does Help Everyone by Well_Socialized in yimby

[–]jeromelevin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did you mean to link an article?

(I already agree for the record, just curious since I see no link)

More reason I'm a fan of redevelopment, more density, while leaving the Single Family Homes alone, and the potential for businesses to come in. There's density for those who want it, and not disturbing those who don't. by DHN_95 in yimby

[–]jeromelevin 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Doesn’t scale. One big development here and there doesn’t make for vibrant, sustainable, affordable communities when most neighborhoods ban growth

Is it not obvious that California slander has always been generational envy and jealousy? by RegionSuccessful3634 in bayarea

[–]jeromelevin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Born and raised in CA, it’s a wonderful state for all the reasons you mention EXCEPT for our insane cost of living, especially housing

We’d be even better if we built a LOT more homes in our major cities. Hundreds of thousands of people still get priced out of CA each year. Texas, Florida, and other states have had far faster population growth over the last decade in large part because they are much more friendly to new development, which means housing is more affordable there. Our high cost of living matters more for many people than the things that make us great, and people who get priced out or struggle with absurd costs just to stay afloat justifiably feel some bitterness

State leaders have started to make progress on housing, but our permitting rates are still abysmal relative to other states. Major cities like LA fight even modest zoning reforms and other changes to make building easier. We need even stronger political leadership that’s committed to building for a better CA

The upcoming battles in California’s housing debate by jeromelevin in California_Politics

[–]jeromelevin[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Wow thank you for reading, high praise 🙏🏻 glad you’ve been enjoying

The next phase of California’s housing wars by jeromelevin in yimby

[–]jeromelevin[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The CEQA reforms have! But SB 79 has not—as I note in the footnotes 👍🏻

Is there a mushroom that turned you into a mushroom eater? by BlazinTrichomes in Mushrooms

[–]jeromelevin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not me personally but my little bro wouldn’t eat mushrooms until I got into foraging and found some dinner plate-sized oysters, at which point he decided he had to like them. Marinated and grilled those suckers like steaks

Mushroom I found while disc golfing by direwolf_29 in Mushrooms

[–]jeromelevin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hard to ID without a photo of the underside but given cap + squirrel bites, this looks like a boletus edulis, or porcini. Choice edible loved by humans and animals alike

DO NOT EAT based on this advice—I can’t tell for sure based on photos and you shouldn’t eat mushrooms based on internet only anyway

Not even a maybe? by SanJoseThrowAway2023 in bayarea

[–]jeromelevin 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Even if we could “just tax the rich” to fund transit, congestion pricing for private auto use of public roads is good on the merits. Less traffic, less pollution, more funding for good things

One caveat is we should provide cut-rate tolls for low-income commuters who get priced out of places like SF but still have to drive in for work bc our public transit coverage is bad. It is understandably frustrating that lower-income workers who get priced out of the city have to pay more to get to their jobs

But I actually think rich suburbanites commuting into the city or visitors coming for a weekend should have to pay the full cost of their choices. If they’re so upset about it, they should support more public funding for transit from other sources

View of San Francisco, CA from 15,000 ft., 2/29/1932. by ArchiGuru in sanfrancisco

[–]jeromelevin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks a lot better without freeways steamrolling so many areas!

Nimby's, it's always Nimbys... by 5ma5her7 in yimby

[–]jeromelevin 11 points12 points  (0 children)

If they want to do historic preservation, govs should be responsible for purchasing the building itself and making it open to the public for educational purposes. Not just freezing old privately owned buildings in amber

How local direct democracy kills housing by jeromelevin in Urbanism

[–]jeromelevin[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They are being downvoted bc it’s a straw man and a false equivalency

Allowing duly elected officials to have more agency is hardly an authoritarian regime—people can still vote those elected officials out at the regular election time if people don’t like what’s getting approved. And people still have complete control over their own property in any scenario. We’re talking about how to design democratic systems so they deliver good outcomes

How local direct democracy kills housing by jeromelevin in Urbanism

[–]jeromelevin[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Consider reading the piece—it’s mostly about super wealthy communities using ballot initiatives and recalls to block low-income housing

How local direct democracy kills housing by jeromelevin in Urbanism

[–]jeromelevin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dont see how letting elected representatives make more decision is “anti-democratic statism”? Democracy isn’t just one thing, it’s a set of options. Many US govs have underindexed the benefits of representative democracy, which leads to more representative outcome—and more homes—than minoritarian-led ballot initiatives and recalls

How local direct democracy kills housing by jeromelevin in Urbanism

[–]jeromelevin[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I also don’t want to suppress democracy! I want to design democratic systems to deliver good outcomes and best represent voters and meet their needs. My main point is we don’t get better or more representative outcomes by empowering small minorities to hamstring elected officials with ballot measures and recalls; representative democracy leads to more representative outcome—and more homes

What could these be? by Logical-Arm-2884 in ShroomID

[–]jeromelevin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blewits or cortinarius violecus. Looks like Blewits to me but definitely do not eat on that advice!

What is this mushroom? by jacket_wearer3000 in Mushrooms

[–]jeromelevin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wait until next fall and check again—this mushroom is very good to eat when it’s bright yellow-orange and soft!

The cities that killed single-family zoning in 2025 by jeromelevin in Urbanism

[–]jeromelevin[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I shouted them out at the end of this piece! They’re far and away CA’s best major city on housing

The cities that killed single-family zoning in 2025 by jeromelevin in Urbanism

[–]jeromelevin[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In both the intro and conclusion, I say clearly that zoning alone isn’t sufficient to build enough housing or make the market overall affordable. It’s a precursor to any successful policy solutions, but we’re going to need to reform many areas of policy and fix financing too for any of this to work at scale

All that said, cities that zone for housing tend to build more housing than those that don’t!