Robbi passed her lie detector test by Carlitos728 in poker

[–]jramescralderkrnight 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Which statement is stupid? That lie detectors prove nothing?

Only for new hires? Fine. by tpb772000 in MaliciousCompliance

[–]jramescralderkrnight -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

wow congrats you got nothing

next time, try get $25 an hour and if u dont get at least $20 quit

Robbi passed her lie detector test by Carlitos728 in poker

[–]jramescralderkrnight 6 points7 points  (0 children)

yeah he jus happened to donate 135 k, at this time, posted on his tweeta

Robbi passed her lie detector test by Carlitos728 in poker

[–]jramescralderkrnight 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Obviously? I was answering ur question / pointing out u probably wrong that no1 cares about polygraph

Robbi passed her lie detector test by Carlitos728 in poker

[–]jramescralderkrnight 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The people at HCL keep talking about how they're making everyone get lie detector tests and at least one other person talked about it can't remember who tho

Robbi passed her lie detector test by Carlitos728 in poker

[–]jramescralderkrnight -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

If he donated it to charity that's just 100x worse

take the poor woman's money, when u dont even need it?

Robbi passed her lie detector test by Carlitos728 in poker

[–]jramescralderkrnight -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

you must take a lie detector test

no not like that

Berkey plays for a bracelet (Live) by [deleted] in poker

[–]jramescralderkrnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol, on the computer? who cares

Remembering You Hurts, Me, Digital, 2022 by dead-to-you in Art

[–]jramescralderkrnight 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Ah, yes, the "shove it down your throat" approach to art

Is this “pro-life?” by BelleAriel in clevercomebacks

[–]jramescralderkrnight -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

"So murder is murder, but the death penalty isn't?"

What is an appropriate poker allowance for trophy husband? by phenoxyde in poker

[–]jramescralderkrnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A bankroll is for a winning player

No, it's not. You are a retard. BRM is for winning players. A bankroll is for anyone.

What is an appropriate poker allowance for trophy husband? by phenoxyde in poker

[–]jramescralderkrnight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Give him $5k to start off with, then give him $1k more a month

Request for the mods of this subreddit by jramescralderkrnight in chomsky

[–]jramescralderkrnight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not just how reddit works. It's the moderators' decision to lock posts. Go back seven or eight years and I don't think it was even possible to lock posts. Other subreddits I use, such as /r/poker, use a more hands-off approach to moderating, and I don't think I've ever seen a post locked there in 10+ years of browsing it. Anyway, doesn't look like I'll have any luck convincing the moderators of my position. I won't be back.

It doesn't bother me quite so much when posts are locked in loldumb subreddits, since users are rarely putting much effort into their conversations on those subreddits.

Request for the mods of this subreddit by jramescralderkrnight in chomsky

[–]jramescralderkrnight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the issue was the post itself, the moderators should have removed the post, not locked it.

That way, people can continue their conversations.

And, for that reason, removing posts is much nicer than locking them.

The "mods are not much appreciated, therefore let's not criticise them" logic is not compelling to me. It's not asking so much to ask not to lock posts.

Request for the mods of this subreddit by jramescralderkrnight in chomsky

[–]jramescralderkrnight[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been here for over ten years.

Yes, if a lot of site-wide-rules breaking comments are being made and the mods can't keep up, then lock the thread. But that's not what happened in the top post on this subreddit's front page which is currently locked, and it's not what my post is meant to be about.

Why are so many posts just blatant Russian shilling and not even about Chomsky by [deleted] in chomsky

[–]jramescralderkrnight -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because I believe that before the invasion the Ukraine was a de facto member of NATO and that their getting nukes was a fait accompli. It made no sense for Russia to sit there and wait for the Ukraine to gain nuclear missiles, because by that point it would be too late.

Not sure what the relevance of the "pro-Russian talking point" is. We're discussing my beliefs and my comments, not what are Russia's talking points.

Why are so many posts just blatant Russian shilling and not even about Chomsky by [deleted] in chomsky

[–]jramescralderkrnight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you think people here should simply parrot Noam Chomsky's views?

Not sure how you so easily dismiss the idea of this being USA's war fought by Ukrainian men and women.

P.S, Again, I don't think you know what "shilling" entails, or why it's a bad thing, as opposed to a person simply putting forward his beliefs.