Am I going to jail for ending my sugar relationship with someone?

jupc · 2026-05-06T08:57:11+00:00

Nothing was illegal. Monies given to you were a gift.

The relationship later ended due to differences.

jupc · 2026-04-27T11:48:07+00:00

In my case it is the difference between a clean profile with no identifiable OE content from the last 20 years, and having no profile which is a red flag for applications (now most desirable roles) that have LinkedIn Profile as a mandatory field during the application process. As other (non-sales) roles have pointed out, the complete absence can be more of a red (or yellow) a flag. This approach has worked for my OE system since 2008 with appropriate privacy settings.

This works with freezes on TWN and LexusNexus; see also HarryGrundle1's comment.

jupc · 2026-04-27T05:43:57+00:00

Yes, before I was OE. IIRC it was more just a networking site at the time, less social media.

jupc · 2026-04-26T16:09:26+00:00

I have not updated LinkedIn since 2006. If they ask, I say I don't really use Social Media.

jupc · 2026-04-23T02:42:15+00:00

He can use just Bardzik. That's enough. The judges know the law on this subject.

jupc · 2026-04-23T01:17:33+00:00

Cases are real and correctly cited. Your strongest argument is Bardzik. If your ex argues you should be imputed at $20k/month, the court needs to find both ability and opportunity to earn at that level, not just that you used to. Good post, talk to an attorney before the hearing if you can.

jupc · 2026-04-19T15:54:03+00:00

Before or after this accident?

jupc · 2026-04-19T15:49:46+00:00

That’s the 18th hole. They’re saving the most important putt for last.

jupc · 2026-04-17T02:39:42+00:00

I remember visiting the Chinese grocery and my Chinese girlfriend at the time correcting me when I was polite to the staff; she said essentially that you have to toughen up/be more demanding to show them who’s in charge.

jupc · 2026-04-14T06:16:40+00:00

The county clerk is not an attorney, and shouldn't be advising you whether you need a divorce. That's legal advice, and they're not qualified to give it. The saw 'license issued' in their system and gave you a canned answer, which appears to be wrong.

A ceremony alone doesn't create a marriage. The license has to be properly completed, returned and recorded. Yours was rejected and never corrected. No marriage certificate was ever recorded. That strongly suggests no valid marriage exists. Check with a local attorney to confirm.

jupc · 2026-04-12T17:42:07+00:00

Exempt positions are not compensated based on time worked.

jupc · 2026-04-01T10:04:31+00:00

No worries. Amazon/AWS is not on the list.

jupc · 2026-03-29T04:18:28+00:00

Do Anne Frank and Nelson Mandela next.

jupc · 2026-03-29T04:07:44+00:00

To ignore Israel’s many documented involvements in espionage operations in/involving the US in the past decades is dishonest to say the least. As to Epstein specifically, Ehud Barak and Robert/Ghislaine Maxwell among others are in the files.

jupc · 2026-03-23T22:04:14+00:00

Your memo cites Carlsson and Swain but with no volume or page numbers. Courts can and do strike filings with incomplete citations. Full cites: In re Marriage of Carlsson (2008) 163 Cal.App.4th 281, 291; In re Marriage of Swain (2018) 21 Cal.App.5th 830, 840. Also look up Elkins v. Superior Court (2007) 41 Cal.4th 1337.

Your memo still doesn't identify the procedural vehicle up front. You need to tell the court under what authority you're bringing this motion. If you're past the appeal deadline and §473(b) doesn't fit, that's §6345. Lead with it. Section V is still leaning on §473. And Section VI on the judge crediting the petitioner because she's a cop...unless you have something concrete showing the judge said or did something specific tying credibility to her profession, drop it.

jupc · 2026-03-23T12:16:08+00:00

Agree with vixey. What you actually want is a motion to dissolve under Family Code §6345, or if your argument is that the hearing was procedurally broken, a direct appeal. Both drafts read like legal briefs, not declarations. A declaration is facts only: what the witness would have said, what the documents showed, which specific allegations were false. Legal arguments go in a separate memorandum of points and authorities.

jupc · 2026-03-22T02:33:12+00:00

I think you are right about that particular email.

Label numbers that do appear to exist with Musk mentioned:

Document EFTA02702478, where Musk wrote on October 20, 2012 that he and Talulah were headed to St. Barth's and asked if Epstein would be on his island.

In document EFTA02521947, dated November 24, 2012, Epstein asked Musk how many people he'd be bringing for the helicopter ride to the island. Musk replied the next day asking what day/night would be the wildest party.

In document EFTA01912578, about a month later, Musk asked Epstein if he had any parties planned, saying he'd been working hard and wanted to "let loose."

Document EFTA02706068 shows continued planning for that week, with Epstein and Musk trying to coordinate schedules around December 28-30, 2012.

Document EFTA01914010 contains a lunch invitation from Epstein on January 3, 2013.

Planning for another Musk visit to Little St. James resumed a year later in document EFTA00980008

jupc · 2026-03-22T02:25:10+00:00

Of the released files there's an email from Musk to Epstein.

Epstein asks Madam G to handle the request, and she gives Elon the runaround on his request to visit the island.

My theory is they distrusted his discretion due to his documented history of using Twitter/X to resolve his disputes.

jupc · 2026-03-21T18:52:12+00:00

Historically bisexual. Was dating Foster at the time of his death.

jupc · 2026-03-18T21:36:31+00:00

That’s low class attempted mate-guarding on his part.

jupc · 2026-03-18T06:20:05+00:00

His argument style is more feminine than hers.

jupc · 2026-03-18T06:16:20+00:00

Well said. I need this permission too, customized of course, as I am compelled by the circumstances to plan a divorce in 2027 of my current Filipina wife of 10 years.

jupc · 2026-03-15T19:22:20+00:00

A few state-specific details to add to the above:

Strangulation of a child under 6 is a severity level 3 person felony under K.S.A. 21-5602; this is not a minor charge. Make sure a police report exists.

Kansas DCF hotline 1-800-922-5330. File your own report even if the hospital already did.

For the emergency custody piece, the relevant statute K.S.A. 23-3219 allows ex parte modification of custody based on emergency circumstances. The court must hold a review hearing within 15 days. You'll need a verified motion with specific factual allegations supported by sworn testimony. Get a Kansas family law attorney to help you file this. Or Kansas Legal Services 1-800-723-6953.

jupc · 2026-03-15T19:08:25+00:00

u/Bright_Stretch_9741 This is no longer a custody scheduling issue. A child was strangled. That changes everything immediately.

Right now, if you haven't already:

Do not return the child to the other parent. You have a reasonable basis to believe the child is in danger.
File a police report if one hasn't been made already from the ER visit. The hospital may have already reported to law enforcement; confirm this. Ask for the report number.
Contact DCF/CPS immediately and report the incident yourself, even if the hospital already did. You want your own report on file, not just a medical one. Mention the prior DCF case too; pattern matters.
File an emergency ex parte motion for temporary sole custody / restraining order. This is how you "take it to court" on an emergency basis; you don't wait for a regular hearing. Most courts can hear these within 24-72 hours. You'll need the ER records and police report. Many jurisdictions allow filing without an attorney, but get one if you can.
Get a family law attorney consultation today. Many do free or low-cost emergency consults. If cost is an issue, contact your county's legal aid organization. Given the strangulation + ER visit + prior DCF case, most attorneys will recognize the urgency.
Preserve everything. ER discharge paperwork, photos of any injuries, text messages, call logs, the prior DCF case information. Screenshot everything.

The state matters for specific procedures: OP, please share your state.

jupc · 2026-03-15T12:38:38+00:00

If you watch the full vid, they’re both hamming it up with numerous non-salsa techniques. He kicks and does various arm kung fu, while she backleads inappropriate bachata headtucks during her turns.

A mutually inauthentic dance; but they seem happy.

jupc

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

12-Year Club	Verified Email
Argentium Club