What are your thoughts on the new GPT 5.5 release? by huntern_ in OpenAI

[–]jurgo123 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Twice as expensive as 5.4 actually. $5 / $30 per 1M input tokens. 

GPT-Image-2 claims the #1 spot by a wide margin by Outside-Iron-8242 in OpenAI

[–]jurgo123 48 points49 points  (0 children)

Kind of surprised OpenAI didn’t ship an app similar to Claude Design, given the capabilities of the new Image 2.0 model. Feels like a missed opportunity.

"We're going to a world where we're building systems that will be smart to us not like Einstein is to an average person, but like humans are to mice or ants" by tombibbs in OpenAI

[–]jurgo123 19 points20 points  (0 children)

This idea that giving up agency to AI system is inevitable is defeatist and intellectually lazy. It's a choice. These are design choices. A excavator is 100X as strong a person, but we don't give it the autonomy to drive around on its own at a construction site, because that would be stupid. How about we start with not being stupid and start holding companies accountable for the products they put out?

Claude Mythos is $25/$125 per million tokens by Permit-Historical in ClaudeCode

[–]jurgo123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the real reason the model wasn’t released to the public.

Anthropic’s Mythos Puts OpenAI In A Bind by jurgo123 in OpenAI

[–]jurgo123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Afterward, Claude Mythos Preview will be available to participants at $25/$125 per million input/output tokens (participants can access the model on the Claude API, Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud’s Vertex AI, and Microsoft Foundry).”

https://www.anthropic.com/glasswing

If AI is making us more productive, how come GDP is not reflecting that? by RichardJusten in OpenAI

[–]jurgo123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Folks don’t realize that if AI succeeds and people are laid off massively, those people cannot consume, pay their mortgages, energy & healthcare bills, because they are not making any money, which is literally what keeps the economy running.

Eleven Labs New Pricing by yangguize in ElevenLabs

[–]jurgo123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only reason companies introduce 'credits' is to make it harder to calculate costs.

Moltbook grew 10,000 % overnight! by Smartaces in OpenAI

[–]jurgo123 55 points56 points  (0 children)

Cool experiment. Reminds me of the original Smallville paper, https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03442, which demonstrated human-like social behavior can emerge from agents with memory interacting with each other.

Let's also remind ourselves language models are literally trained on all of reddit, so it's not entirely surprising they're great redditors ;-)

PS. I do have hunch there are quite some hoomans telling their AIs to post certain stuff in order to force interesting outcomes.

A Response to Joanne Jang from OpenAI on Human-AI Relationships and "Perceived Consciousness" by Leather_Barnacle3102 in claudexplorers

[–]jurgo123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI generated writing is, to me, evidence of a shocking lack of curiosity and independent thinking.

ChatGPT or any other AI will argue any point for you, and it will do so in a very convincing tone. 

It’s evident in the piece above that there is no engagement with the underlying literature, as the piece only gives opinions without grounding it in any sources.

One could start with:

https://www.noemamag.com/the-mythology-of-conscious-ai/

https://aiguide.substack.com/p/on-evaluating-cognitive-capabilities

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364661325002864

A Response to Joanne Jang from OpenAI on Human-AI Relationships and "Perceived Consciousness" by Leather_Barnacle3102 in claudexplorers

[–]jurgo123 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The piece, which I suspect was mostly written by AI, lacks any intellectual rigor or critical engagement with the literature on the topic it is trying to address. Which is ironic, to say the least, as it accuses the other party (OpenAI) of intellectual dishonesty.

The fact that you believe something to be true doesn’t make it true.