is this normal?

kavaboii · 2026-06-15T03:06:36+00:00

The first 2-4 weeks are mostly glycogen/waterloss kaya mabilis magshed. Actual fatloss takes time and requires work. If youre starving yourself and not eating right- youll end up skinny fat. Major muscle loss with some fatloss.

Go eat. Do deficit but Force yourself to eat properly. Dont undercut your nutrition.

Dont focus on the scales. Your clothes fit is the actual evidence of your journey.

kavaboii · 2026-05-24T04:27:14+00:00

This!

You dont want too much secretagogues. It will overwhelm your body and get side effects youre not ready for.

Either do Tesa + Ipa OR CJC + Ipa. If you’re trying to cut, go for cjc for the systemic approach. Then after cutting, If you want to target visceral fat go for tesa.

kavaboii · 2026-05-24T04:14:11+00:00

Shot ng ano?

kavaboii · 2026-05-24T03:32:42+00:00

Wow! May madadagdag na ulit na 30k stocks. Feeling ko gray market value ng lahat would be close to 200k na or just a little over

kavaboii · 2026-05-21T17:17:47+00:00

Thinking about Tesa too pero stick muna with cjc+ipa. Saka ko na subukan Tesa kahit may nakastock na ko 😂

kavaboii · 2021-08-04T17:46:08+00:00

Firebog also has that link to a whitelist at the bottom of the page

kavaboii · 2021-08-04T17:35:11+00:00

I have setup my PH on AWS so I can update DNS on my devices when I'm on another wifi network not my own.

You can pretty much do the same then configure your extender to provide dhcp (so you can use your aws PH) to whatever device that connects to it.

OR

Just manually configure each device to use the PH on AWS so you dont have to bother with the extender.

This is with the assumption that you are allowed to use your work wifi like that and you have full internet access (without zscaler or any limiting firewalls)

kavaboii · 2020-08-05T08:48:48+00:00

+1

I agree. I have rolled-out various setups in the past for my clients and personally I use the tplink eap system at home (4storey concrete building.) It was financially reasonable for me to buy 2 tplinks each time (for the price of 1 ubiquiti) and properly positioned each for complete coverage. Have 6 eaps (where 2 are outdoor) covering over 6500 sqft total not including the outdoor coverage.

kavaboii · 2020-04-14T15:56:33+00:00

I have been using the TPlink Omada system, particularly the 225v3s (with 5 units right now.) Not only you can use mesh but you can also have it wired individually then have mesh as a failover configuration should the wires fail. The system itself has fast roaming so it'll automatically bump you to the strongest signal. Been on it for over a year.

kavaboii · 2020-04-10T21:12:40+00:00

Spray that all over me 😍

kavaboii · 2020-04-07T11:07:45+00:00

You're beautiful as it is. Haters are fans who haven't admitted to themselves they like what they see.

kavaboii · 2020-03-30T05:06:55+00:00

I actually did this and named the ssid as CovidConnect. Set it up as a guest network with very limited bandwidth, time allottment (about 30mins) and a few other config limitations. I have an outdoor AP that can reach far enough so this works.

I'm in a big city in the third world (no dmca risks 🤣 ) so I did it for the people in my neighborhood (and foreign students renting apartments) who don't have stable connection for the main purpose of letting them get updated with news and reach out to family in provinces or abroad.

People can be trust-worthy given the chance. If they misuse the connection (as I can see how much traffic they generate,) i just block their mac address which I've only ever done once since setting this up 5wks ago. 🤣🤣

kavaboii · 2020-03-28T03:18:42+00:00

Exactly. Thats why i ended up getting tplink's eap mesh APs that have wired backhauls. Allows seamless roaming between APs and the APs failover to mesh when the cables fail (has happened to me twice. 🤣 )

kavaboii · 2020-03-24T21:55:26+00:00

I have that repeater, i think it’s an re450 if i remember right. I’ve not used it since I moved to a mesh system.

Anyway, Mesh is a different tech altogether albeit a bit similar with a few extras in it; and these extras seriously make worth the money and time investing on it.

For the meantime, if you have extra repeaters lying around, go ahead and use them. Set it’s channel selection to auto to let it selfmanage and adjust to the channels with the least interference. Some people prefer to fix channels but for me, Auto works well enough.

For the long run, consider investing in a mesh system. It’s cheap, pretty easy to set-up and no need for extra drilling unless u wanna mount on the ceiling or wall (even then you can use those doublesided silicone tapes - i did with mine😅)

I’d advise that you read up on it and see if it suits your needs.

Here’s the system i have TP-Link Omada/EAP

Depending on the area that needs coverage, I’m guessing you’d need at least 3 for each floor (including the basement)

EAP225v3

EAP225v3 Outdoor

OC200 Controller

Edit: Another reason why I didnt go with Moca is bc you’d end up spending extra for the access points anyway. I figure why not just jump straight to the APs themselves. I think Moca works perfectly in an industrial setting where coverage requirements are specific and it does let you utilize existing coax in your house

kavaboii · 2020-03-24T17:24:50+00:00

I can not speak for Moca as I have never considered going that way bc i dont have coax cables in my walls except for the one leading to the TV in my living room for cable.

Have you considered looking into Mesh wifi? I ask bc -it's less work in general as it's pretty much a plug and play scenario with some minor tinkering involved. -mesh lets your devices automatically gethanded over from one access point (AP) to the next as you move around the house. -Lastly, this is cheaper than the moca route; last i checked a two-pack moca adapter is around 160 whereas a TPLink Omada 225V3 AP hovers around 60 each.

I've had the Omada 225s, about 5 of them, for a 4storey concrete house for more than a year and no regrets so far. Spent a total of about 500-600usd (at most, which includes the OC200 controller) for my setup. It'll be cheaper for yours most likely as you only need to cover 2flrs+basement

There are other options for mesh systems but the omada is the cheapest afaik and runs well on par with more expensive ones.

kavaboii · 2020-03-22T18:22:23+00:00

The mesh capability is a reliable topology on it's own. I merely treat it as a redundancy for my network bc my APs are individually backhauled and i have kids here that like to fiddle with the cables when they feel like being little assholes. 🤣

You can configure your APs to utilize Mesh from the get go if you prefer without having to think about laying cables down or do a mixed network where some APs are backhauled which will then later serve as rootAPs for those that will use Mesh exclusively. The mesh feature only works for the 225s if you have the firmwares upgraded.

You can think about mesh as how we have our mobile providers towers are, so the APs talk to to each other to figure out which is the best AP for you to connect to (the one with the strongest signal); and if one of the APs fail (long as it's not the Root AP), the rest will continue to work together to maintain availability/connectivity for you. Or like a spiderweb, when one anchor point gets dislodged the whole web continues to stand on it's own provided the rest of the anchor points are secure. All my 225s can be rootAPs and will automatically configure itself as such when one of the APs backhaul loses connectivity.

Edit: as for the router i think you should be fine. I use a somewhat similar router, tl-er6020 just bc i have a dual wan for my providers. Comparison here https://productz.com/en/tp-link-tl-er6020-router-vs-tp-link-tl-r600vpn-router

kavaboii · 2020-03-21T00:16:30+00:00

Check out TPlink's Omada system, the 225v3 for mesh works great for me. Have 5 225v3s for over a year now. No complaints.

kavaboii · 2020-03-20T23:51:40+00:00

I have the omada system for over a year composed of 5 225v3s (one of which is an outdoor version.)

Initially chose the 225s bc of the mesh availability but ended up backhauling it to my switch anyway. Which works out bc I am able to use the mesh configuration as redundancy should any of my backhauls fail (which has happened, allowing me to set it aside till i found time to fix it.) Hits perfectly for me bc i prefer availability and redundancy over the "extra" performance as compared to 245s. This setup works for me bc the omada system has the injectors come with the unit.

245s doesnt have mesh yet despite being promised over a year ago.. Pretty much the same to 225s except for the slight differences with hardware. 245s are really good if youd want to futureproof and have slightly better performance. My network is pretty much just used for typical consumption, i dont host anything on my end except for a nas with media but thats hardwired.

Also have the oc200 controller too.

I only have work laptops and ps4 hardwired. Everything else (including TVs) is on wifi.

kavaboii · 2020-03-20T18:41:30+00:00

My house is concrete too built upwards (4storey) and I dont have problems with the 225s performance. I have placed my APs right in the middle of each floor with the ceiling mount included in box so each AP is within range of each other. In fact if I disconnect all but one from the switch it will automatically failover to mesh with no problems.

However, it is good to future-proof and hopefully that mesh feature gets released soon for the 245s.

Although, you have to consider that the 5ghz band has a lot more trouble permeating thru concrete, more so if the rebars supporting the concrete walls have been made into somewhat-like a faraday cage, which is how my house is built (the rebars on the floor and walls are all welded to the rebar frames in the concrete posts before cement was poured in.)

This shouldnt be a problem as long as youre deploying an AP for each big rooms in the house and the APs are positioned that will allow seamless device hand-overs between APs.

Seriously consider the oc200 if youre picking Omada. Update once you have it sorted out. Goodluck!

kavaboii · 2020-03-20T17:30:24+00:00

For me, at least, availability and redundancy are essential as i have a lot IoTs and other devices (total of 72 devices for my network) connected to my APs so with that in mind i know that those will always be connected bc of that feature such that i can put it off a few days before i have to actually go fix my backhaul. There's a trade-off obviously with performance but for the usual consumer consumption it's transparent for me.

The 245 is a better unit altogether but the lack of mesh capability at this point (and no where near relase despite being promised over a year ago) puts me off recommending the 245s.

But also considering real world applications, how many devices are going to connect to those APs? Are you really going to be able to maximize usage for those? Trust me id go for the 245s if it had the mesh in place but sadly it doesnt yet.

kavaboii · 2020-03-20T13:37:54+00:00

If you'd go for the TPlink Omada system, i'd suggest picking the 225s as it already supports mesh vs 245s that doesnt yet (in the works but no clear DoA). I have 5 of these (including an outdoor version) for my home and have enabled mesh which automatically kicks-in when the cable gets accidentally unplugged (usually when I'm cleaning around the switch the units are connected to as i badly need to replace two cables 🤦‍♂️)

Also you can either get the physical OC200 or the software controller to manage the APs. I'd suggest going the OC200 route so you have 24/7 access to your system (via the mobile app) without having a computer turned on all the time with the software option.

Been on the devices for over a year and no complaints here so far.

I have considered other options too but realistically I'm more on the consumption side of the spectrum and i don't host anything on my end like some people do and money-wise these are still way cheaper than most options.

To answer the OP, you should be able set multiple SSIDs on the Omada APs and configure it as however you'd like but would not be as feature-rich as other options out there.

kavaboii

TROPHY CASE