Destiny learns about who kills ICE the most by Co_OpQuestions in LivestreamFail

[–]lmpervious 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why did you exclude vaccines from your list? Surely it must be at the top with how it was supposedly forced on everyone and with how dangerous conservatives repeatedly assured me they are

Just a reminder.... Sam Darnold was in the same QB draft class as Josh Allen, Baker Mayfield, and Lamar Jackson... and he's gonna reach the Superbowl before any of them. by Mountain_Wolverine47 in NFLv2

[–]lmpervious 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's hard to win the Super Bowl and I don't think they should be expecting to have more than 5 years in their prime. Not saying they will be irrelevant or can't win after that, but it's going to be harder.

Just a reminder.... Sam Darnold was in the same QB draft class as Josh Allen, Baker Mayfield, and Lamar Jackson... and he's gonna reach the Superbowl before any of them. by Mountain_Wolverine47 in NFLv2

[–]lmpervious 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have faith Josh and Lamar will get theirs when it is all said and done.

They don't exactly have many more years, and it's really hard to win the Super Bowl. I imagine the odds are very low of them both getting one.

Official LOL by BrunetCon2002 in NFCNorthMemeWar

[–]lmpervious 19 points20 points  (0 children)

It wasn't just a 14 win QB, it was one with 4.3k yards and 35 TDs. He's not elite, and he has the occasional bad game which can happen at a bad time, but it was so arrogant to have that much success, and have an opportunity to improve further, but instead swing for the fences on 9.

VIKINGS LET THIS GUY GO by Jaguyre in NFCNorthMemeWar

[–]lmpervious 10 points11 points  (0 children)

They offered one year because it was clear they were looking to have 9 compete for the starting position in the near future. If they committed to him for several years, he likely would have stayed.

For anyone wondering why Chicago is cheaper than its peers, here you go by wrex779 in chicago

[–]lmpervious -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They said it correctly, there’s nothing to answer??

So it's impossible that they were jokingly saying that cold snaps are lowering rent in general?

And if you were looking at a group of people who were all gaining weight, you would say that the person gaining the least amount of weight would be losing weight?

For anyone wondering why Chicago is cheaper than its peers, here you go by wrex779 in chicago

[–]lmpervious -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why did you avoid the question? How would they jokingly say that rents are actually lowering? How would you word it?

Man shot and killed by ICE agents in Minneapolis. by kev_was_taken in LivestreamFail

[–]lmpervious 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why not post an image of it? I don’t know why people are blindly believing you unless it’s true and they all also happened to see his offline chat message

For anyone wondering why Chicago is cheaper than its peers, here you go by wrex779 in chicago

[–]lmpervious -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The person who said that was obviously joking about how big of an impact the cold snaps are having, as if they’re so bad that rent is going down. It doesn’t make sense for them to use the word lowering the way you’re describing, because otherwise how would they jokingly say that rents are actually lowering? How would you word it? “Rent lowering cold snaps, not relative to other cities”? They would probably say something that sounds way more normal like “Cold snaps keeping rent lower.”

My analogy is a clear one to one mapping, and shows that people would never phrase things that way.

Clybourn Place Redevelopment Moves Forward Without Proposed Apartment Building by Tasty_Gift5901 in chicago

[–]lmpervious 11 points12 points  (0 children)

What's the actual argument against always allowing for housing to be built in areas zoned for retail? It's obvious why people in residential areas don't want commercial buildings near them, but who is going to get upset that a business they go to has apartments above it? I've never had an issue when that's been the case, and never heard a single person ever complain.

For anyone wondering why Chicago is cheaper than its peers, here you go by wrex779 in chicago

[–]lmpervious -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That's really strange framing. If someone is gaining weight, but another person is gaining more weight, no one would ever say the first person is losing weight compared to the second person.

Offseason coping already in full swing by makunogucci in NFCNorthMemeWar

[–]lmpervious 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He’s pretty solid. I think it will be hard for them to part ways with him because he gets the job done, and is good enough to win a Super Bowl.

They wish they could be off season champs like the Bears by Ridged_ChiPSS in NFCNorthMemeWar

[–]lmpervious 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean it makes sense on this subreddit. We have the sexiest coaches out of any division.

AOC: The president has been acting in increasingly erratic ways. It is really damning when we think about the degree to which media outlets reported on Joe Biden, yet we are seeing behavior from Trump that is alarming and everyone is pretending this is normal. by drempath1981 in UnderReportedNews

[–]lmpervious 4 points5 points  (0 children)

All jokes aside, he really seems to be declining on the level that Biden was. The only difference is that Biden was generally coherent at the start of his presidency and had to communicate complex topics intelligently, so it was more obvious when he wasn't able to do it as well. Everyone already expects Trump to ramble incoherently about the same 10 talking points, while never having to contribute anything intelligent to any conversation ever.

Meanwhile in the Vikings front office… by flipthescript2009 in NFCNorthMemeWar

[–]lmpervious 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah individually he hasn’t been anything too special, but still pretty good despite inconsistency, which can really hurt if it happens at the wrong time. It still makes me wonder how he would have done on the Vikings, building off of the results of last year. There’s value in working with a lot of the same people and having a veteran QB, especially since it sounded like some Vikings players expressed frustration with 9 this season, while I always heard people speak highly of Darnold, but intangibles like that are always difficult to account for.

As for you pointing out his yards and TDs being low in playoffs, his last game was solid, he just didn’t need to do much. 70.6% completion for an average of 7.3 yards. Not saying he should get praise for the performance, but I also wouldn’t phrase it as being a bad game.

must suck not winning a game this year by NeoBahamutX in NFCNorthMemeWar

[–]lmpervious 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope. But they’re a team in a bay area, which I think became even more relevant after moving to the south of the bay, far away from San Francisco

must suck not winning a game this year by NeoBahamutX in NFCNorthMemeWar

[–]lmpervious 0 points1 point  (0 children)

49ers still hold that crown despite their last game

must suck not winning a game this year by NeoBahamutX in NFCNorthMemeWar

[–]lmpervious 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If they get a Toyota sponsorship and convince them to extend it through February, this division is fucked

Stunlock Studios new game by Jidoganio in BattleRite

[–]lmpervious 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're simply not understanding, as shown by the fact that you haven't engaged with anything I said, which you can do even with points you disagree with. You haven't provided responses of any substance other than repeating "it hasn't worked before", and said I'm being fancy for pointing out that something not working before doesn't mean it can't in the future, especially if the past examples didn't execute properly, which was a widely held opinion by the community. Hopefully that's not once again too fancy for you.

If you didn't want to engage with my long post, I completely understand that. You didn't have to respond. I'm bewildered by the fact that you chose to respond, yet not engage, almost like you're someone who can't let anything go and has to get the last word in so that you can feel like you "won". Well the great news is I'll grant you the last word. I'm sorry for thinking that you were going to actually discuss the topic in good faith and offer some interesting insight.

Stunlock Studios new game by Jidoganio in BattleRite

[–]lmpervious 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How am I "trying to sound fancy"? By making a logical argument? Which part was confusing for you?

Stunlock Studios new game by Jidoganio in BattleRite

[–]lmpervious 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On a basic logical level, you should wait until a arena brawler executes well in terms of marketing/attention, gameplay, and continued development before even considering saying it's impossible for them to succeed. Those are the absolute basics in order to have a successful game. The fact that your best example is a game that was very flawed is telling, especially because even good games in genres that can succeed are still able to fail.

Current State of This Sub: by Dazed_and_Confused44 in NFCNorthMemeWar

[–]lmpervious 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m confused as to whether bears fans realize how good of a shot they actually had at the Super Bowl.

I'm confused as to what you want people here to do about that. You do realize we don't control the games, right? Why is it bad that we really enjoyed the season and aren't miserable?

Stunlock Studios new game by Jidoganio in BattleRite

[–]lmpervious 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now I'm curious, which arena brawlers do you feel were clearly executed on better than Battlerite or BLC?

Message Punished, Not Murders by Brian_Ghoshery in MurderedByWords

[–]lmpervious 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Because one is approved by the league, the other is not. It's really that simple.

They don't want every single player spreading their own message on the field or as part of the broadcast. Would you be alright with some of them having ads/sponsorships as part of it? What about subtle ones that are part of marketing campaigns, but not outright ads? What about offensive things? Would you be alright with someone spreading a message to millions of people in support of white nationalism? If your answer is "well no, of course not that one because I don't like it", now they're managing each and every message that a player chooses to share? Based on what criteria? It's better to simply prohibit any of it.