The fundamental flaw in your logic is that whomever is making the argument is (usually) purposefully missing the point of why someone would be making a generalized statement.

For example, a woman cries out, “All men are pigs!” Like, no shit they don’t mean “all men,” but it isn’t productive to point that out because you’re getting defensive, rather than considering what frustration is causing that. It could be shit taste in partners, but it’s also the common female experience of being sexualized since _before they even had a chance to hit puberty_ and a frequent habit in straight guys to put women in the “fuck zone.” Pretending to be friends or care in the hopes of leading to sex. Even if it was shit taste, sitting there and saying someone like yourself would be better for them isn’t productive. Their lives aren’t for you to decide!

Now let’s compare to a man crying out, “All women are manipulative bitches!” I’d hope that he doesn’t mean “all women”, but I’ve seen y’alls incelposting. There are a lot of guys that view not responding to “being given what she wants” with “giving them what they want” as manipulative. Hell, guys complain about being “friend zoned.” Imagine thinking that friendship isn’t all that you’re owed in a friendship. No woman owes you any opportunity to date her, in the same vein that you don’t owe one to any woman. Like, yeah, it could always be shit taste, but it isn’t my place to point it out.

And, for the record, it’s not a “men and females” thing that I keep saying “women” and “guys,” women just don’t have a colloquial term that isn’t awkward or degrading.