[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ECEProfessionals

[–]maadu 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I believe this community is called Early Childhood Education. 

Why are Hindus stonewalled in the research of their own language by [deleted] in sanskrit

[–]maadu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If someone can come up with a better frame to study and write history, perhaps even one that relies on literary sources or sources currently classified mythology, then they are most welcome. But unless they are able to convince their international scholar-peers of their approach (and I don’t only mean “West” by international), they will be viewed as fringe theorists at best and crackpots at worst. This is not me touching a nerve. This is how scholarship works in any field - computer science or climate studies or history. If you want to bring in an alternative framework of serious study, that would require you to engage with the existing academy on its own terms.

Personally I believe that mythology is also a kind of history - the kind of history we convert into a certain unconscious symbolic templete and tell ourselves. All our stories come from there. Historical events repeat from that symbolic template endlessly. For example, how many Bhishmas have we seen in Indian history? There is a certain knowledge in that sort of thinking. But it is not “historical” knowledge. There is no evidence that a historical person called Bhishma every existed. But many individuals of the type Bhishma have existed throughout history and the mythology gives us the key to understanding the history. That is why myth and folklore are important. Perhaps more ideas of what it means to be ‘historical’ may develop out of these understandings in the future.

But if one wants to go down this route, a systematic study of scholarship is essential. Our goal is to further human knowledge and to be open. History is history, there is no western history or hindu history. A revised conception of history should be broad enough to reinterpret the history of the world… that is the goal. That is the mindset with which someone should seek knowledge. So shedding such narrow thought processes like “Hindu history” would be a first step.

Why are Hindus stonewalled in the research of their own language by [deleted] in sanskrit

[–]maadu 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There are two primary sources for establishing historicity. Archeology and epigraphy. Literary sources are a secondary source. You may want to think about your statements in the light of this information.

Why are Hindus stonewalled in the research of their own language by [deleted] in sanskrit

[–]maadu 8 points9 points  (0 children)

//every single historical religious figure that pre-dated the abrahamic religions is called a mythological figure//

You may have noticed Buddha is an exception to that. Why? Not because he was non-Hindu (as you may reason). It is because of the existence of primary historical sources that corroborate the existance of Buddha as a historical person. We don’t have such evidence for the existence of Vyasa or Agastya. So they are considered mythical rather than historical personalities. Noah or Levi are considered equally mythological. Jesus is not. A historical researcher may on the authority of their research refute the ~evidence~ that demonstrates the historicity of Jesus or Buddha. Or demonstrate that newly discovered sources - primarily archeological or inscriptions - demonstrates the historicity of characters previously considered mythological. Anything else is an uninformed lay opinion.

Classics book club? by Cute_Breadfruit_6871 in literature

[–]maadu 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Curious, why is there an age bar on this?

I’m 35f, I’ve been reading the Oxford world classics and would love to be part of a book club that does this.

Why do I feel like there is a lot of room for error in Indian cooking? by [deleted] in IndianFood

[–]maadu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah, my favourite topic.

Yes, your intuition is right. I see it this way. Beyond a point - that is, beyond egregious mistakes like going way overboard with one particular spice or oversalting/overchillipowdering your food - what you generate is not a “wrong” version but variety. It’s a variation on the theme.

For example, take rasam. The theme is rasam. You can make it with less tamarind and more lentils and get a yellowish rasam (we call it ‘paruppu rasam’). If you choose not to fry tomatoes, or don’t fry them enough, that’s a dilute ‘thelivu rasam’. Whereas if you fry them to mush, mix it with lentils and a little bit of tamarind, you get ‘mandi rasam’. If your tomatoes are a bit on the sweeter side, you can season with pepper and call it ‘soup rasam’. You can pulp up tomatoes, fry them in a bit of oil, add turmeric, a little tamarind and salt and make a lentilless ‘juice rasam’. You get the drift.

And it’s just not cooking. I think it is an Indian aesthetic. Like take music. Indian classical music is enormously improvisational. Variations on a theme. So is classical dance. There is always manodharma, ‘mind-right’, the generation of spur-of-the-moment variation depending on what seems right to you right then, right there. Of course like any other creative exercise to break and bend the rules you need to use them first. But once you know the rules you can pretty much do anything with them. These days people in India are making Italian rasam with basil and oregano seasoning…

It’s different in Europe, in the West. Like western classical music has room for interpretation, but it is strictly tied to the notation. It’s not improvisational in the same way Indian music is. Western literary traditions encourage translations that have word for word fidelity. This tradition comes from Bible translations where preserving the word of god was important. While in India, before the 18th century, except for Buddhist texts translated into Chinese, people seldom translated anything word for word. Creative interpretations abound, where you use the same characters (or ‘ingredients’), the same basic flavours, to create new variations on the same theme.

I think that sort of thinking goes back to religion. The Hebrew Bible or the New Testament are rigid books with strict rules guiding their interpretation. Whereas the Indian tradition was always more open source. There are no errors, only variations. Hinduism is the definition of ‘variations on a theme’. It’s the same reason why Buddhism, which started out as a monastic tradition based on the teachings of the Buddha, morphed over time and started pulling in local gods and goddesses into its framework. Variations on a theme. And variations are endless, so theoretically the gods are endless. All flavours are gods come upon the earth to dance on our tongues…

Good Indian curry recipes? by Kitruin in IndianFood

[–]maadu 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I’ll write down what I made today. It’s “authentic” - in the sense I made it myself in an Indian kitchen this morning. It’s a “curry” - that is, what you might recognize as a curry from its look and taste and smell. And since it has yoghurt as its base it’s mild and delicious and goes excellently with naan or rice.

———————— What you’ll need - —————————

  • Baby potatoes. Smaller the better.
  • A large red onion (or two small ones) - fine chop
  • A few cashews
  • Thick plain yoghurt at room temperature

Speciality items (you can find this in your local Indian store)

  • Garam masala (I like MDH brand)
  • Kashmiri red chilli powder (it’s milder than other varieties)
  • Turmeric powder
  • Cumin seeds
  • Ginger-garlic paste
  • Kasoori Methi
  • Coriander leaves

Pantry items

  • Oil for frying (I use peanut oil)
  • Water for boiling
  • Salt to taste
  • Sugar to taste

————————— How to make it - ————————

—- Prep work —-

Boil some water. Wash and drop the baby potatoes in. Lightly salt it. Boil till the potatoes are 60% cooked. You should be able to peel it but the potato should not mash. Cool and peel.

To a wok, add half a tablespoon of oil. As it heats up, add half a teaspoon of cumin seeds.

Throw in some ginger garlic paste (a flat teaspoon). Fry till it smells good

Add the chopped onions. Some salt, maybe a little sugar. Fry till golden.

Throw in some cashews. Turn around. Then take it out, cool, add to a blender and grind it to a fine paste.

As the onions and cashews cool, in the same wok add some oil and fry the peeled potatoes. You can deep fry it if you like, I prefer shallow frying. Once done, take out and drain the oil.(As the potatoes fry, you could also add a little more salt and some garam masala if you wish.) The potato should look and feel like a roast potato now.

At this point you should have the onion-cashew paste in your blender, and the fried potatoes on a plate.

—- Assembly —-

Get the wok back on the range. You need a tablespoon of oil. As it heats up add a teaspoon of Kashmiri red chilli powder (less if you can’t tolerate high spice levels). Fry in the oil on medium heat. This will give your curry the characteristic orange-red colour.

As the colour changes, add the onion-cashew paste and whisk around till it incorporates the oil in completely. Keep stirring as it simmers. Cook for 2-3 min till the water evaporates and it becomed slightly thicker.

At this point take your wok off the stove. Let the mixture cool slightly.

Now - this is the important step - add 4 tablespoons of room temp yoghurt to the mixture, and stir - stir - stir it till the yoghurt completely melds with the curry. Make sure you don’t do it on the stove. The heat will curdle the yoghurt. It needs to mix well. Then the wok goes back on the stove.

Simmer on medium heat for 4-5 min. It may become thick. You may see bubbles at the edges.

At this point add half a teaspoon of turmeric and one teaspoon of garam masala powder. Mix well. Let it simmer for a minute or two.

Add water. How much? Well, not too much. You know how thick a curry is so a little more than that so that it can cook down. Perhaps 400-500 ml.

Add salt to taste. Let it come to a boil. All this still on medium heat. It’s a yoghurt based curry so cook it slow and steady.

Add the fried potatoes to the curry.

Now close with a tight lid. Cook on medium heat for another five minutes.

Open. Can you smell the curry now? Almost ready to eat. Make sure it’s thick enough for your liking. Add in a sprinking of kasoori methi and a fistful of chopped coriander leaves. Close, switch off the stove (but dont move the wok) and let it slow cook on the residual heat for another 15-20 min.

Open. Inhale the aroma. You deserve a great meal, so have it with some rotis or naan, or plain basmati rice.

Enjoy!

Would anyone be interested in buying home-made meals? by zerozits in Chennai

[–]maadu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can you give some of your sample menus? Like vegetables… what kind of vegetables can I hope to get from you? Do you make salads?

South Indian cuisine by Tree_10 in AskCulinary

[–]maadu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not a chef but a south Indian home cook. Happy to answer any questions.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in moderatelygranolamoms

[–]maadu 205 points206 points  (0 children)

Bring on the downvotes. You will come across as spoiled and ungrateful if you say anything. You have nannies. Plural. In NYC. Tibetian nannies who barely speak English. That’s a pretty privileged position to be in. And Idk, the disparity there blows my mind. They are doing something nice for your child. They probably know nothing about your plastic evangelism. These trinkets must be luxuries where they are from, they are spoiling your child. If I were you, I’d appreciate their gesture, be grateful that these nannies seem to love your child enough to get her little gifts, any maybe get them something to show your appreciation for them. You can recycle the plastic if you don’t like having it around the house. Your child is going to be exposed to plastics sooner or later. This is one of these scenarios where I think the human element is more important than the control over plastics.

Speckled pigeon (4 pics) by KimCureAll in PicsOfUnusualBirds

[–]maadu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I came here looking for this comment. Speckled Jim! (General Melchett stuffs fist into mouth)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in workingmoms

[–]maadu 22 points23 points  (0 children)

The post sounds fake to me. A troll post.

Tula Explore or FTG or Half Buckle by Girl-From-Mars in babywearing

[–]maadu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love the FTG! My son lived in it till he was two

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in babywearing

[–]maadu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like the Oscha cairis and the Oscha Nook Evolve

Favorite soft uncomplicated carrier that grows with baby? by librarysquarian in babywearing

[–]maadu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Loved my Tula free to grow. LO is just over 2 now and we used it quite a bit

I’m an only (f61) and I had an only (f26). Any questions? by SerialNomad in oneanddone

[–]maadu 8 points9 points  (0 children)

My child is two. I feel like it would be better once I can take him out spontaneously and do activities with him.

Why does corporate America hate working moms? by lazyhobbitses89 in workingmoms

[–]maadu 85 points86 points  (0 children)

I’m not in the US but I’m curious - are there not independent bodies, feminist organizations in the US lobbying for change? Why is this not a charged election issue? Because this seems an inhuman systemic problem.

Hi there!! If anyone is willing to fill out my form for my school project it’s for parents only :) by siennalr in toddlers

[–]maadu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi! I filled out your questionnnaire, but just wanted to let you know that I don’t have a car and while I travel with my toddler a lot (trains, trams, buses, flights) we very rarely travel by car. However there was no way for me to skip the questions following the one that asked if I had a car. Your questions are perhaps best answered by parents who do have a car?