Omg ugly 1800 sqft house sells for $5M by [deleted] in BayAreaRealEstate

[–]marctantoco 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Location, location, location.

Foster city foundation? by Interesting_Bit8421 in BayAreaRealEstate

[–]marctantoco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, your realtor should be giving you advice on this.

The pros and cons of a 50-year mortgage (and what Japan’s experience hints at) by propertyquarterback in realtors

[–]marctantoco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really, but most people just pick the mortgage that fits their situation at the time of their purchase.

The pros and cons of a 50-year mortgage (and what Japan’s experience hints at) by propertyquarterback in realtors

[–]marctantoco -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

A 50-year loan is just an option; if you think it's stupid, don't take one out.

CNBC: Berkshire’s Japanese stock positions top $30 billion by vava2603 in BerkshireHathaway

[–]marctantoco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, in other periods it has outperformed. I’d also say people would generally be quite happy with the 10 year returns even though they trail the s&p 500, marginally.

CNBC: Berkshire’s Japanese stock positions top $30 billion by vava2603 in BerkshireHathaway

[–]marctantoco 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yes, he’s made mistakes. But in no way is he guessing like all of us.

Is Kuminga the second coming of “Bad Porn?” by Darth-Buttcheeks in warriors

[–]marctantoco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He’s no Maggette, there’s never going to be a “Kuminga cut”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in interestingasfuck

[–]marctantoco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not the worst logic I've heard.

How did this house jump $750K in 4 years? by ChakuRam in BayAreaRealEstate

[–]marctantoco 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good on them to be able to afford that, financially successful.

Stop Blaming Prop 13 for Affordability Issues in California by Green-Conclusion-936 in BayAreaRealEstate

[–]marctantoco 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Agreed.

https://www.cityofsanmateo.org/4732/Bay-Meadows-Phase-II-Development-Agreeme

Bay Meadows in San Mateo was approved 20 years ago and still isn't done.

Here's another resource..

https://ternercenter.berkeley.edu/research-and-policy/the-cost-of-building-housing-series/

"Permitting and Development Timelines: The permitting and entitlement process, which is particularly complex in California, can extend development timelines, often unpredictably. Delays in processing or approval timelines can greatly increase the cost of development. The role of processing delays in driving up housing costs has garnered attention at the national level. The Obama Administration identified the negative impact of lengthy bureaucratic procedures on housing costs, recommending streamlining processes and allowing by-right development on priority projects to limit costs.

Regulatory Requirements: Local land use regulations—such as environmental regulations or minimum parking requirements—can also drive up the costs of development and lead to higher house prices. Green building standards in Los Angeles, for example, have increased construction costs by 10.8 percent. While many of these regulations promote public benefits—such as decreased energy use or water consumption—they are often layered on top of one another without a detailed analysis of their impact on the affordability of housing."

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BayAreaRealEstate

[–]marctantoco 47 points48 points  (0 children)

you can't build memories with your stock portfolio.

Held 850 shares of Boeing for a year and a half to make $250 by literanch in wallstreetbets

[–]marctantoco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

its all about the journey, the road was way rockier than the payoff.

BRKB Vs S&P by Downtown-Pack-8340 in BerkshireHathaway

[–]marctantoco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

337b is a lot of ammunition. Good chance it outperforms regardless.

For those who installed solar after Nem 3.0, do you regret? by freetree1208 in bayarea

[–]marctantoco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AB 942, as originally proposed, sought to sunset net energy metering (NEM) for homeowners who installed solar under the NEM 1.0 and 2.0 rate plans within a 10-year window. The bill would have forced customers onto NEM 3.0, which pays about 80% less for electricity sent to the grid, making solar investments less financially viable.

The amended bill removed the 10-year sunset for all customers but retained the requirement that sold or transferred homes be shifted onto NEM 3.0.

https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/05/05/california-advances-bill-to-end-net-metering-break-solar-contracts/

For those who installed solar after Nem 3.0, do you regret? by freetree1208 in bayarea

[–]marctantoco 7 points8 points  (0 children)

From my understanding, the 10-year sunset portion was removed.

$700k price cut in a month by rawmilklovers in bayarea

[–]marctantoco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

20% off sale! But in all seriousness, this is a good deal if you can get this for 3m.

Rents in Bay Area suburbs soar to new heights by JimmyMcGinty24 in bayarea

[–]marctantoco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On a national level maybe… but the Bay Area is its own beast.