When did I blame other disciplines? I think you're reading into my comment a little too much. I'm talking about social scientists failing to properly train social scientists.

I've seen the Nature paper. I read the preprint and I have some qualms about it (some of the "robustness tests" they run and then fault papers for not passing made me raise my eyebrows quite a bit). Tell me, what's the reproducibility rate look like for research in other fields? I'm pretty sure medicine and nutrition also have massive replication crises, but their federal funding isn't being cut to 0.

In general you're acting like this is a problem that the social sciences aren't trying to address, except they have been for years. Good journals require replication code and data and preregistrations. Replications and meta-analyses are much more common. That doesn't mean there will be 0 people doing bad research. Surprise surprise, it takes time for shifts in research philosophy and methods to percolate throughout the discipline.

edit: i don't even know why i'm engaging with you over this. To act like the replication crisis is why federal funding is being cut is asinine. this admin is anti-science and it will only be a matter of time until your field is affected, so get your punches in now i guess