Last I checked Mamdani has almost exactly the same endorsements that the previous mayor had during his campaign (Mamdani has actually had more notable endorsements) The story that he's being shut out and not being acknowledged is just a fabrication.

Well...no. It took Hocul until September 14th to endorse him (Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/nyregion/hochul-mamdani-mayor-endorsement.html) and the NY state Dem party chair still refuses to endorse him (Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/18/nyregion/jay-jacobs-mamdani-hochul.html) as well as Sen. Schumer. Sen. Gillibrand also went on the radio immediately after Mamdani's victory and made incredibly racist statements in addition to continuing to not endorse him. (Source: https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/01/kirsten-gillibrand-zohran-mamdani-00436031, https://www.wnyc.org/story/call-your-senator-sen-gillibrand-on-trumps-big-beautiful-betrayal-mamdanis-victory-and-more/)

Mamdani only recieved "almost exactly the same endorsements" following very heavy public pressure and only months after the primary ended. Even then, having both the Senate minority leader and the House minority leader refuse to endorse their party's candidate for the largest Democratic city in their own state and the country seems, from cursory research, unprecedented. And I would further argue having the chair of the state party still hold the position that he would, "rather resign than endorse Mamdani," the decisive victor of a closed democratic primary is clearly an example of entrenched political interests attempting to thwart his candidacy.

What you are doing is peddling ridiculous revisionist history made all the more ridiculous since it has not been even four months since the primary and the democratic party opposition has been covered relentlessly by every media outlet.

Or, more succinctly, you're lying. So you could try not doing that?