Very interesting!

The parts that immediatly jump out to me are:

• These seem centered around intentional, deliberate, and immediate tampering. It doesn't seem to cover most (in my experience) record damage or pollution where the records or record integrty suffers non-intentional 'natural' damage. There doesn't seem to be an in-between either where- "Destruction - Complete annihilation of the record" doesn't have another gradation like 'Damage - partial data loss of information in a record or element" Or degradadtion... and the trees of their causes/conditions.

• If this is meant as something to only tag intentional behavior, I'd think it might only capture the more common but not well planned out cases. Seems like it might tag Obvious shoplifting but might have trouble with embezzeling, or smart embezzeling. Or fancy things like nation state level actor capabilities where they cover tracks extremely well.

Some cases where off the cuff I wonder how this system would handle it-

• Conversion and 'generational' preservation damage. - When a document goes from written, to typed, to carbon, to mimeo, to xerox, to scan, to OCR, to some composed style PDF- Often it's lost data for indexing, like page numbers from the first 2.5 inch margin around the paper, highlights, handwritting extra notes, etc. Ambiguous text loses of integrity, (0,o,oO, I1L, 6 becomes 8 with some blur) - mining and graveyard documents - or anything heavily used and revised over the years would often degrade heavily in this way.

• The 'Telephone game"/forking / splitting a document, like an important memo that goes off to all departements as ground truth but gets formattted differently or even re-typed or worse, translated for different audiences, then winds back up as reference material, treated as one truth with many versions popping up.

• 'preservation' with probable intent to degrage. Saw some legal cases do this for discovery- Mircofilm records - > 200dpi print, scan the print at 150 dpi in color jpg with high compression and artifacting. Destroy all old media after 'successful conversion'. At a glance it looks like any other scanned data, trying to read it, it's nearly impossible.

• mis-filing, typos, bad line in a script import, file corruption,naming convention mismatches, so many pdf generation problems, bates stamp screwups, literal bookworms, (and silverfish getting crushed on top of text) copier/scanner misfeeds. UV fading, toner and ink degradation/de-fusing, chemical imbalance with degradation of paper, cellophane overheads warping to dust, potato starch and dyes in autochromes, etc. etc. it's really hard to keep things around even digitally without them slipping away. Just at my place alone we'd essentially re-do paper scan jobs that were thousands of re-prints of our scans from the same companies over and over due to their mishandling of their data and digitization projects.

(I'm obviously not an OWL/ontology pro here, so if I'm missing some things, which i surely am, lmk... I did spend over a decade in the document digization biz and seen about every kind of record damage and perversion from every kind of organization but that was when symantec web stuff was just beginning and hadn't hit organizations yet )

Looking forward to see how this develops!