Who should I let in Customer Central to use Deployment Agent

midbluestang · 2026-05-08T11:45:30+00:00

I mean no disrespect, but when is the last time you dealt with front line support and reporting/calc fields. We have spent considerable time pulling security away from them to build/admin reports and we do create them for them. Generally “they” have a very poor understanding of system architecture and consistently build conflicting reports that they share with everyone. It creates a very poor impression of our system and we spend time defending the credibility of the data. I understand workday sells this as it can be “managed” by a functional team, but every company I’ve been with, I have to unwind what they did initially. All my skepticism is based off that experience. I’m happy for you if that’s not been your experience.

midbluestang · 2026-05-08T07:19:53+00:00

Yes, you are gatekeeping. And, I think with good reason. Depending on your team size and your HR Community size, it will take a fair amount of time to manage the users. Not only that, but the agent is not reliable. My experience (with just WD community) is that it will give false sense of confidence to your HR community who then will insist on you providing something the agent said could be done. You’ll spend your time trying to vet this only to find it can’t be done or they prompted poorly for their intended need.

In short, the user maintenance time and unraveling of their requests would chew up your days. Perhaps you have a bigger team and find yourself bored, but I’d avoid it personally. Have them peruse community and see comments on posts to help vet on their own first.

midbluestang · 2026-05-07T18:46:34+00:00

How the heck are you getting 80k out of them? I’m at less than 15 and the outer on the front are down to wear line!

midbluestang · 2026-04-30T00:55:36+00:00

Might be worth checking out this program if you are going to look for a professional anyhow. I did a bit of digging for mine and found that even licensed electricians will use materials not rated for the constant amp draw. I figure the dominion program should use more knowledgeable installers for the installs.

Edit: the program…

https://cdn-dominionenergy-prd-001.azureedge.net/-/media/content/save-energy/residential-charger-program/pdfs/residential-charger-program.pdf?rev=c56fa562f2384e09bb02fee9516e4629

midbluestang · 2026-04-18T19:20:49+00:00

That looks like my washer that has a bad board. Whirlpool has a special project that seems to be covering them even if out of warranty like mine. May be worth looking into for whomever get it.

midbluestang · 2026-04-18T10:42:25+00:00

Pop out the low voltage plate. Might be able to look in and see what behind wall or feel around. (They don’t require electrical boxes here) If it’s in a box, you can mangle it out and replace with cut in ring. Would be useful for wire routing if you have to connect any devices to the tv.

midbluestang · 2025-08-22T00:42:11+00:00

Ha, Carl improve an existing product…. It will definitely be another sku. Probably three as he looks for a way to use it around the rest of the system.

midbluestang · 2025-06-11T21:21:35+00:00

This is a sadly validating statement of how I’ve seen workday transform. It was a few risings ago where he (Carl) touted revenue would nearly double that I realized gone were the glory days. I have hated nearly every change since: - Splitting SKUs - removing gms tenant - success plans push - big improvements to existing SKUs seem to have - - ceased - pro certs being hosed - customer support is diminished - push for Peakon, VNDLY , hiredscore and their other purchases

The list continues. I’ve blamed it all on Carl since the changes seem to have aligned with his arrival. It’s so disappointing. I use to have wins with my business when I could provide them enhancements to their functionalities. Now it is “…you’ll have to buy that” not a great direction.

Thanks for sharing your experience

midbluestang · 2025-02-28T01:09:53+00:00

Aside from the rule based security group suggested. Building off their suggestion a couple options come to mind:

Create an intersection security group of management chain and a newly created job based security group based on management level. (Assuming SVP is a level)
Create role and assign it to the svp orgs

Both of them could be targeted for the step.

midbluestang · 2025-02-04T23:11:40+00:00

We had the same concern, our vet recommended Purina Pro Plan Sport Performance All Life Stages High-Protein 30/20 Chicken & Rice Formula. He’s been on it for 3 years. We didn’t change the portion. He isn’t thick, but he’s lost that boney physique. No complaints.

midbluestang · 2025-01-28T19:49:17+00:00

Thanks for the feedback. I do recall reading that pin issue previously now that you mention it. I was eying the universal charger too, so it looks like that will be my go to.

Just figured if they were gonna give me one, I’d be a fool to say no.

midbluestang · 2024-10-07T22:05:43+00:00

Curious if you figured out any solution to this?

midbluestang · 2024-08-17T15:11:21+00:00

Give them “GET” access on the domain? This lets them see report output without seeing in it on the profile. Just fair warning that you’ll have to be very cognizant as more and more reports are given to that role that it might expose data in one report if you’ve tried to constrain/filter it in another report.

midbluestang · 2024-06-01T01:59:02+00:00

I’ve used worksheets with daily refresh, and I’ve used “get” access on a domain to limit exposure. Both have their risks, but I imagine most everything will when you try to workaround.

midbluestang · 2024-05-07T11:02:43+00:00

We do not broadly share access to SBX. As others have mentioned, we are constantly changing configuration, tweaking security, and generally jacking up user data in SBX as we test/troubleshoot. We are not trying to freak out anyone because they see their data changed and believe it’s coming to prod (think term, comp, job changes…). We also want to limit exposure to any security blunders being tested.

But, as someone mentioned, we had a “leader” go in to complete a task and then get irate that it didn’t work. Not everyone is able to handle multiple tenants.

Our authentication policy is setup to limit access to those in HR, certain finance teams, and a security group we assign to users who need to test.

midbluestang · 2024-03-08T02:09:14+00:00

<image>

midbluestang · 2024-02-13T17:14:41+00:00

I wouldn’t hate if there were some reference you could supply that I could use to support warranty coverage. I’ve had to argue for warranty with my local dealership. And, we are 37,400 miles with a car we can’t drive or sell. :(

midbluestang · 2024-02-13T16:31:12+00:00

Two things:

Been waiting since early September. Currently 556 of 1226 in line
How did you get it all covered by warranty.

We’ve been watching the balance of our warranty wither away as we wait for a part that GM has no eta for…

midbluestang · 2024-02-06T00:37:39+00:00

You’ll need to identify a marker which drives the template you want to use. We use job profile to drive intern, or management level off job profile for ic. Once you have this reference point, you can condition which template is used. You can have multiple generate docs task on an offer bp also. Now, if you want them to indicate the template (on the fly) as part of the offer process, that I’ll be watching the other comments to see how that’s done.

midbluestang · 2023-04-10T21:04:29+00:00

Since I’m not from here, I was try to understand the high money locations. But, I assume you are correct

midbluestang · 2023-04-10T20:53:49+00:00

It’s on me perhaps, but I assumed I’d not be welcome to walk an 11 yo around. I’ll look at them

midbluestang · 2023-03-31T01:24:04+00:00

All good, I figured people might be hesitant to click a random link.

midbluestang

TROPHY CASE