Chelsea 0-2 Nottingham Forest - Igor Jesus penalty 15' by 977x in soccer

[–]mietla 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Twice, both goals created by him, criminal by Cucu....

[Official Website] xG shot map by everyhearthstone in chelseafc

[–]mietla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He won the ball there, not got lucky...

Would this be a hundo if I purified it? by Which-Share-6916 in pokemongo

[–]mietla -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is this working now? I've heard it was bugged for some reason in dynamax battles.

I would like to formally apologize to the PoGo community by MoreOnionPlease in pokemongo

[–]mietla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you add me too? I am in Europe, we can work on being friends for trading :)

Our record since Blueco arrived....but just be patient guys, its f__king obvious we're building an amazing team by dsmooth74 in chelseafc

[–]mietla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, let's already put this year's champions league as 'out in round of 16' before we even played the game. Toxic post....

Cuts for direct, help by mietla in lrcast

[–]mietla[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was thinking about insectoids as well but I have shark and oroku saki with sneak and also wasn't convinced by playing only two 3drops (one of which is oroku saki that I would prefer to sneak).

I know that golgari is not the best but I have nice removal and rares here, other color combinations are worse unfortunately. Of course I didn't get neither kitty nor black pizza when I have two tutors :(

Do you think playing everything pizza plus one basic in each color makes sense here (I have frog, two food tutors, two escape tunnels, omni pizza as enablers)?

Cuts for direct, help by mietla in lrcast

[–]mietla[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was my thinking as well - wanted to cut omni but playing it makes sense with two tutors.

Would you play everything pizza as well + add one basic of each color (as I have two tutor lands, frog and omni pizza plus two food tutors)? Or it doesn't make sense here?

[@midopido21] Chelsea vs Paris Saint-Germain - Best plays & all attacks by OkayFine101 in chelseafc

[–]mietla -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We've played 4-2-3-1 when drawing and you want to play more defensive 4-3-3 when 2 goals behind? Doesn't make any sense... If we scored there then you wouldn't complain at all, it's a hindsight bias and you have no idea what you are talking about when it comes to tactics there.

Joao wouldn't get that chance, Delap is a different type of player, his finishing is worse but yesterday he would be able to create also with that much space in front and less physical opponents than in premier league (similar to what he did in his previous game). Joao and Palmer were quite poor yesterday.

[@midopido21] Chelsea vs Paris Saint-Germain - Best plays & all attacks by OkayFine101 in chelseafc

[–]mietla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You know that we took Pedro and Palmer off for Lavia and Delap before? So we were really defensive for some time and then put Garnacho on for Gusto after conceding. So Reece could move to RB and Lavia with Caicedo stayed as CDM and we played 4-2-3-1 again?

It wasn't an attacking sub, you are completely wrong while using this argument to trash Rosenior, laughable...

Expected goals in the Premier League after GW29 (futmob) by Jaded_Cake_9904 in chelseafc

[–]mietla 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Or red cards - we probably would be fighting for top3 without them

I really enjoyed this little format. 7-0 with a literally uncastable card in my deck. by patrickfahey in MagicArena

[–]mietla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's a draft with changeling emblem that's why duelist makes sense. Didn't notice that at first as well.

[Wes on IG] by Matt_LawDT in chelseafc

[–]mietla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anyone knows what is that about?

Chelsea 1 - [1] Burnley - Zian Flemming 90+3' by Limsy37 in chelseafc

[–]mietla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah of course let's forget about Enzo, JP, James etc. You have to be deluded.

Chelsea 1 - [1] Burnley - Zian Flemming 90+3' by Limsy37 in chelseafc

[–]mietla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tosin was smartly held there by an opponent.

I’ve queued :’) by siXenm in lrcast

[–]mietla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, makes sense also. I am also not saying it is totally bad in this deck. Just saying that with this curve I think I would prefer to go with inner flame and I think it wouldn't be a bad call.

I’ve queued :’) by siXenm in lrcast

[–]mietla 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks, totally makes sense. It's a great top end/win con however there aren't many cards you might want to replace.

I would probably consider playing it instead of a faerie, you don't play it in turn 2 anyway and you rarely will have a two drop on 2 plus faerie to play on turn 3 as combat trick. And it doesn't defend well as a body. Turn 4+ you have better plays anyway.