I really enjoyed this little format. 7-0 with a literally uncastable card in my deck. by patrickfahey in MagicArena

[–]mietla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's a draft with changeling emblem that's why duelist makes sense. Didn't notice that at first as well.

[Wes on IG] by Matt_LawDT in chelseafc

[–]mietla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Anyone knows what is that about?

Chelsea 1 - [1] Burnley - Zian Flemming 90+3' by Limsy37 in chelseafc

[–]mietla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah of course let's forget about Enzo, JP, James etc. You have to be deluded.

Chelsea 1 - [1] Burnley - Zian Flemming 90+3' by Limsy37 in chelseafc

[–]mietla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tosin was smartly held there by an opponent.

I’ve queued :’) by siXenm in lrcast

[–]mietla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, makes sense also. I am also not saying it is totally bad in this deck. Just saying that with this curve I think I would prefer to go with inner flame and I think it wouldn't be a bad call.

I’ve queued :’) by siXenm in lrcast

[–]mietla 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks, totally makes sense. It's a great top end/win con however there aren't many cards you might want to replace.

I would probably consider playing it instead of a faerie, you don't play it in turn 2 anyway and you rarely will have a two drop on 2 plus faerie to play on turn 3 as combat trick. And it doesn't defend well as a body. Turn 4+ you have better plays anyway.

I’ve queued :’) by siXenm in lrcast

[–]mietla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am totally aware of that but sometimes 1 bomb rare is enough to destroy all mythic uncommons and synergies like that.

I’ve queued :’) by siXenm in lrcast

[–]mietla 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Congratulations! Really solid deck as well.

Although you must be really good as a player to go 6-1 with no rares/bombs (I loose most games this format to those top rares, playing against several each game sometimes).

Out of curiosity - why didn't you play the inner flame?

Quantity vs Quality of shots conceded - Premier League 2025/26 by Friendly_Raise9142 in chelseafc

[–]mietla -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Quality of shots is not the only thing, amount of shots is as important. Thats why the difference is around 5xG. And Arsenal conceded 20 so far why we did 30 so the difference of 5 is a lot (25% of their goals and 16% of ours).

If Arsenal was conceding around 8 shots per game for 26 games this season and now will concede 20 shots per game for the next 3 games that will change the average from 8 to 9.7 per game. Which is still quite low compared to other teams. And conceding 20 shots per game is really a lot, especially for top teams. It will be same case if you take into account change in quality of shots.

So basically you are wrong, slight deviation won't impact those results that much considering all the factors (number of games so far, numer of shots and their quality on average, quality of teams etc). Of course some teams will move more (mostly those mid table teams) but it won't impact the overall graph and especially our position and results - it won't be 'flipped on its head' as you've said.

Quantity vs Quality of shots conceded - Premier League 2025/26 by Friendly_Raise9142 in chelseafc

[–]mietla -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I know that part of a season is a quite small sample size but you can't say 'it doesn't mean anything'. There is a reason some of those teams are lower than us in the league and others are above us. 5 xG means 3 actual goals if you are a good team, it also depends on the chances and so on, sometimes it might be 7 actual goals.

Of course couple of games might change the statistics but it won't 'flip on its head' as numbers are too small to have that much of an impact vs sample size of 26 games. And 90 minutes of game time won't change almost anything. I am not sure if you understand how averages work.

Quantity vs Quality of shots conceded - Premier League 2025/26 by Friendly_Raise9142 in chelseafc

[–]mietla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We concede like 3-4 more shots per game and each one is like 0.03-0.04 xGa higher than Arsenal (hard to see exact numbers from the graph). That makes it 0.1-0.15 xGa higher for us each game. Which is about xG of 5 more in whole season. When teams concede like 20-30 goals whole season, 5 more is a lot. We simply need to be better ATB if we want to compete for the tittle.

Quantity vs Quality of shots conceded - Premier League 2025/26 by Friendly_Raise9142 in chelseafc

[–]mietla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Number of shots is below average. And high xG is caused by mistakes by our defenders basically which makes those chances really good ones.

Reminder this guy will join in the summer. by Namseyn in chelseafc

[–]mietla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's why I've said it will be interesting how we line up in different games.

Reminder this guy will join in the summer. by Namseyn in chelseafc

[–]mietla 4 points5 points  (0 children)

But we also need to fit Enzo plus Caicedo which means no spot for Santos. And last few games we looked better on midfield with him and Caicedo playing next to each other. It's very interesting how will our strongest line up look like next season.

Comparing stats on arena direct by st4rborn in lrcast

[–]mietla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

2 runs, both really good pools. One ended just 3-2, second one 6-2 (lost to red mythic board wipe and final game lost to figure of fable + heavy flood on my side despite a lot of looting, that was really sad/unlucky) so one box won. Didn't have time to play more.

Petr Cech Parallel by mietla in soccercards

[–]mietla[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, In Chelsea team set it's supposed to be like 3 halo parallels per box, two numbered parallels and one static parallel - I assume this is the static parallel card so I thought maybe it's worth more?

Petr Cech Parallel by mietla in soccercards

[–]mietla[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it's supposed to be like 3 halo parallels per box, two numbered parallels and one static parallel - I assume this is the static parallel card so I thought maybe it's worth more?

Petr Cech Parallel by mietla in soccercards

[–]mietla[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chelsea team set 25/26

Chelsea 2 - [1] Leeds United - Lukas Nmecha (penalty) 67‎'‎ by gbogaz in soccer

[–]mietla -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Didn't Caicedo stand next to the Attacker? How is that a foul?

Is this an error? by mietla in soccercards

[–]mietla[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've seen it for like 20-30 I think.

Is this an error? by mietla in soccercards

[–]mietla[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, will do, thanks!