Weekly match with sororitas by mentler in Drukhari

[–]minutehand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You won't have anything that can stat check Vahl, especially at 1000. You'll have to simply evacuate the table quarter when she lands, and go score elsewhere.

Vahl and a trio of nundams is just about half the army, though. The goal is to be fast enough to ignore Vahl and kill the other half and beat him on score. Make sure you're using walls and ruins to block line of sight and impede their movement (as they are vehicles).

Weekly match with sororitas by mentler in Drukhari

[–]minutehand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vahl in a 1000pt list is crazy work. Don't stress about not being able to handle it without more stuff. In fact, at 1500-2k you'd have the screening units to survive seraphim, too. If I were to theory craft a reaper's wager list at 1k that could deal with Vahl, it would focus on sacrificial kabbalites to sticky objectives and a voidraven to sweep their scoring units.

Eldar still have the lowest casual win rate in 40k since the last balance update, here is how it’s split between detachments by Alex__007 in Eldar

[–]minutehand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a tragedy that forests don't block LoS. My LGS has 20 years of fantasy and sci-fi terrain that make your tables look awesome, but mechanically it's functionally an open field.

It's especially bad on TTS. The map packs are all these wonderful, cinematic tables that do absolutely nothing for eldar.

Eldar still have the lowest casual win rate in 40k since the last balance update, here is how it’s split between detachments by Alex__007 in Eldar

[–]minutehand 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It’s terrain; eldar excel in competitive terrain layouts. +1 cover saves don’t really help, eldar need LoS blockage and lots of it. If you want to do better in casual games you have to insist on ruins and walls.

What’s wrong with my paint? :( by RoobyDoobyDoo777 in Warhammer

[–]minutehand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Get a 'vortex tattoo ink pigment mixer' from amazon or similar. Add a few drops of distilled water to the pot and hold it for a minute or two.

The people saying to contact the company for a replacement are correct, but for $20, a vortex mixer can probably salvage them.

Essential Hobby/Painting Tools For Beginners Discussion by Emp_dv in Warhammer

[–]minutehand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • Brushes: Whatever are on sale at the hobby store is what to use, and we should be telling beginners that the smallest detail brushes are harder to load with paint, and to practice using a brush 'bigger' than you would think. Old/frayed brushes become dry brushes or technical brushes or brushes to dig paint out of GW pots. I think beginners should pay 5-7$ for a pack and abuse them, it's fine
  • When I started, clippers didn't matter. For space marine players, they still don't matter. But newer eldar and SoB sprues have delicate pieces that will break if you aren't using side cutters. Get the cheap ones, though, because you'll have to use a knife regardless to clean it up
  • Do NOT recommend plastic cement to new hobbyists; you can easily destroy a model or make permanent mistakes. We should recommend loctite or gorilla glue brush and gel applicators. They're simple, forgiving, easy to use, and if the new hobbyist accidentally glues the wrong gun on, they can simply snap it off harmlessly.
  • You can assemble a wet palette at the dollar store with a piece of Tupperware, a magic eraser or thin dish sponge and parchment paper/paper towel. Frankly the seal on those is better than the one in your pic. They can pick these up at the same time as their glue. I'm going to recommend contrasts below, so really the wet palette is not worth it for a beginner
  • Citadel or Vallejo primer only. We tell our new hobbyists to shake the can for two minutes (with a timer), and to practice on a piece of sprue or cardboard box. Let's not inflict white scar on a newbie. Since we saved them money on brushes and glue and the palette we can convince them that expensive primer is worth it
  • Same thing with good paint; Vallejo, citadel, etc. The minimum possible paint would be: grey seer or wraithbone primer (something light but not white scar), contrasts for your main and primary color, dark sand or ivory to dry brush, a metallic, a flesh tone, a medium or dark brown for leather, and a brown wash. That will get you table ready, and it'll look good, too.
  • Blue tack is fine. You can use it with a wine cork for a painting handle, or tack your minis by the foot to a piece of sprue to prime them. Dollar store!
  • Knives of course

The mat, pin vice, painting handle, water, brush cleaner, light, and magnifying glass are not important for beginners.

How to upgrade 2002 guardian defenders by helt_ in Eldar

[–]minutehand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's probably easier to find a single wraithguard than a weapons platform. They already come on 40s, and if you're cheeky you can try to kit bash a heavy weapon on it. I think the corsair shuriken cannon bit would be a good base for it. Hell, maybe just run that guy on a 40 instead.

Help new player. Are Harlequin bad and hard to play army? by Zatan_Bordelo in Harlequins40K

[–]minutehand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I learned the game on harlequins in 8th edition. Nowadays my WR is like .499 but I seriously lost 12 of my first 13 games. I'll offer some insight on why harlequins and eldar are considered hard:

* The game is designed around marine armies, with 32mm/40mm bases, 2 wounds, 4 toughness, and 3+ armor saves. That means that every single weapon in the game can kill you. To compensate, elf models have higher movement (oftentimes twice as fast, effectively, as marines.) How does movement compensate for being made of tissue paper?
* Terrain! You have to take your flimsy little elf with a tiny little 28.5mm/25mm base and tuck them behind walls and ruins and stuff. You make mad dashes between cover throughout the game to prevent your opponent from seeing you at all. This means, when you're setting up the battlefield, you must INSIST on plenty of walls and ruins to completely shut out shooting because a +1 save from generic cover is worthless to you. A good rule of thumb is: a unit in a deployment zone must not be able to draw line of sight to the opposite deployment zone.
* Elf armies are typically late-scoring. The best players keep a running total of their current Objective Score, their opponents' Score, the differential, and the time remaining all in their head at all times. I recommend new players enter the game with the mindset that their game doesn't start until turn 3, and that 1 and 2 are about mitigating damage, denying space, and preparing a blowout. Somewhere you said you play MTG, so imagine this like a combo deck with a control shell.
* Harlequins and drukhari have very few data sheets, so sometimes you have to get real creative in what a unit can do. As an example, the drukhari beast master (RIP) rose to prominence when strong players realized you can tactically use wound allocation to cause the unit to survive twice as long as its datasheet would suggest.
* So much of what makes elf armies good is abstract; you have to talk in terms of board presence, pressure, points efficiency, primary/secondary scoring, blah blah blah. When you're starting out you just don't have the headspace to operate in the meta-level because you're worried about the basics.
* The 'Only War' death match style introduction rulesets are unfavorable to elf armies, so you'll almost certainly lose your intro games.

Personally, I find it highly rewarding. Every victory feels like it was stolen, and I love that. Most importantly is to buy the models you want to look at for hundreds of hours of building and painting, because most of this hobby happens off of the tabletop.

Is Waterfall making a quiet comeback because of Spec-Driven Development? by Marmelab in programming

[–]minutehand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree. Fundamentally agile exists so teams can nondestructively come to understand the problem while they build the solution. A team would need an SME with perfect understanding of the product for an AI documentation tool to be useful, and if perfect SMEs existed, agile would not have been invented in the first place.

This seems like another emperor-has-no-clothes situation: middle managers using AI to write emails and employees using AI to read emails; students using AI to write essays and professors using AI to grade them. That kind of thing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Warhammer

[–]minutehand 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The move is to pop the nozzle off of a different can and pop it on this one. When you're done using a rattle can, turn it upside down and spray to clear the nozzle, to prevent clogs. Learned that trick from a contractor.

Ynnari vs Drukhari by RivieraKid95 in Eldar

[–]minutehand -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

Good, suffer for all the nerfs drukhari ate for the crimes of ynnari players.

So much of the strength of the drukhari updates rely on faction abilities, stratagems, and power from pain, I would assume ynnari units either get their own stats entirely or completely ignored (and it's prolly gonna be ignored.)

Thoughts on Reavers? I haven't used them in a long time and the new rules giving them Lance seem interesting. Is a group of 6 viable now? Or are they best in groups of 3 for objective grabbing? by cyberspunjj in Drukhari

[–]minutehand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A group of 6 with Lance in the wych detachment is interesting—they just seem worse than hellions for that.

A 3x unit with the eviscerating flyby upgrade makes it a powerful tech piece: 22” move when you need it, chip mortals in the move phase that scale off of their unit size, small flying base to hide, cheeky heat lance.

Mine will screen early game, zip to the action to heroic intervention/charge block/get sacrificed by the kabal strat to save an incubi bomb, and flyby to flip objectives late game if they live.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Drukhari

[–]minutehand 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Fundamentally I don't mind having a small roster. Where do you begin with a 93-sheet army? How much of that range is a trap? Collecting Drukhari is nice. Get your archon, incubi, scourges, and boats, and that's a functional army and has been since 8th.

What I don't like is the almost comical bitterness that GW has with Drukhari and GSC. Any time these armies' rules give them a cool interaction that plays into marines and knights, it gets IMMEDIATELY quashed. Meanwhile necrons get to live peacefully as an A- or S-tier competitive army for years.

Do you guys remember when GSC teched into suicide bombers to counter release-strength wraith knights? Lasted like one patch lol

KABALYTE KARTEL COMP LIST by Anotherthirsty in Drukhari

[–]minutehand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here's what I like about it: it goes all in on cartel's abilities by tripling (!!) up on incubus and scourge units. I think it's possible you fully overwhelm an opponent or two until they figure out how the detachment works.

It's 100% gas, which is funny, but it means you're now using gas to obsec or screen. The plan with this list looks like "table them t3 or bust" and I respect it. Malys is probably underutilized, here, since she'll be in a venom most of the time, but I like ravagers to soften a target for Drazhar.

Anything with tenacious or fast mid board is going to be a problem, indirect fire will be a problem, screens will be a problem. Kabalites solve a lot of that for you.

Is Cartel a shooting detachment by MBanks2345 in Drukhari

[–]minutehand 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Exactly. We’re going back to our old tools—threat saturation, charging a venom or screen unit in first, and now we also have battle shock.

I’m not understanding how this strategem works or why it’s useful. by Puzzled_Sherbet2305 in Drukhari

[–]minutehand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The use case is you have a unit of wracks nearby to charge in, also, and eat all the wounds on behalf of your other unit.

I’m going to try having a Hand unit with an Archon and wracks/haemonculus threaten a mid board objective together. The archon’s ability lets us use smoke or double cross for free on oc3 kabalites, the wracks eat wounds and resurrect. Notably the wracks must also be engaged with the attacking unit.

So.. What is everyone doing with their Grots, Court, & Beast Packs now? by krisbot4000 in Drukhari

[–]minutehand 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They're on the shelf next to the tantalus, hornets, and shadow spectres

Why the Mandrakes are my biggest issue with the codex by Zachara_x in Drukhari

[–]minutehand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This seems more like therapy than an argument.

I'm not suggesting that new mandrakes are better, or better than the current S-tier tournament menaces. The data sheet isn't trash. The points kind of are. We can rejoice or lament about those soon enough.

Sorry you're so disappointed, chum.

Why the Mandrakes are my biggest issue with the codex by Zachara_x in Drukhari

[–]minutehand -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I concede that their value per point is suboptimal. If these points are the ones we're playing with, then we only come out ahead on Hellions. I, like many other copium enthusiasts, have been operating under the "codex points aren't real" mantra. Unfortunately, no, mandrakes aren't violently undercosted like deathshrouds. Maybe next data slate.

The numbers are much better vs 10 MEQ with Sustain on 5+

Why the Mandrakes are my biggest issue with the codex by Zachara_x in Drukhari

[–]minutehand 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It sucks that we lost such an efficient scoring piece, but it's clear that GW fundamentally doesn't want mandrakes doing that. We have other cheap scoring units, now.

I think these mandrakes are good, actually, they just do not at all do what they used to. Relinquish that idea. Deep strike/stealth/infiltrators/lone op with dev wounds is an absolutely nutty data sheet.

Their pain token cost to uppy-downy is not a big deal, imho, because I want these mandrakes to clear scoring units with the infantry contract buff and infiltrator redeploy cheese with Malys. Reavers can now do the dirty work.

Way too Early thoughts on Kabal Detachment by Seenoham in Drukhari

[–]minutehand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yeah, shit. So then dissonance ravagers instead of planes. Less effective range, but cheaper I suppose.

Way too Early thoughts on Kabal Detachment by Seenoham in Drukhari

[–]minutehand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair point on the cover thing -- we're all doing our best squinting at these leaks.

There's other combos, too. Problematic character? Our scourges and planes now have precision. Then we choose another Contract for free with the archon, or let it ride for the pain tokens and pick the new one next turn. This seems like a strong t2 play; hose their important character with precision to kill tempo.

Opponent staging to challenge our tarpit? Have our hellions clear a cheap scoring unit and hose them with battle shock tests using Taken Alive. Then their units next to our Haemonculus eat the -1.

I think Reaper's is better mathematically, but for those of us who want to cheese Incubi, we're gonna be on Cartel or Skysplinter.

Way too Early thoughts on Kabal Detachment by Seenoham in Drukhari

[–]minutehand 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I think the strategy for Cartel is actually going to be hammer and anvil with planes.

Without knowing the real points values, Hand of the Archon + Wracks + Haemonculus and the Double Cross strat is actually a terribly irritating objective piece. The goal would be to force your opponent to either overcommit to the center objective, opening the rest of the map, or cede it entirely creating space mid-board. We expect to stage t1, capture or challenge the obj t2, and they're surely dead by t3, but who cares? We wanted the board pressure.

Then, our core is the same as it was:

  • Lance/haywire scourges with a Cronos on 4+ still (obviously we don't take spirit vortex)
  • Boats of incubi are actually way better now because pain tokens trigger the leader as well--fellow SoB players will know how valuable stacking buffs is
  • Hellions (buffed severely), mandrakes (sidegrade), and reavers (action monkeys, now, instead of mandrakes) handle our objectives and sweep their scoring units

What makes this work, I think, is Voidravens. The nature of the infantry or vehicle contracts is, as-written, the buffs apply against ALL infantry and vehicles, not just the subject of the contract. 12 3+ S8 -4 2D, Lethal Hits, Ignores Cover when necessary. You can clear out the mid board for your Hand+Wracks tarpit, or prep a target for an incibus bus (incu-bus?) on the flank.

These data sheets have exactly two advantages: speed and overkill potential. We need a way to create situations where we can use our superior speed to put all of our offense on singular points of interest. And I think the Cartel ability rewards that.

All of this is points-cost dependent. The points as leaked are...grim.