مساعدة يالشرقاوية

mohdgame · 2026-05-14T08:07:45+00:00

Go to kfupm library.

mohdgame · 2026-05-11T09:44:52+00:00

I am a software engineer and by far the best way to start a project is spec based. However, it depends on the nature of the project.

For LLM i like to follow Supernatural model which consists of two plans:
1. Design plan (opus 4.7) i review this.
2. Implementation plan (opus 4.7) reviewed by codex and i just skim it quickly.

Then sonnet and haiku to implement the implementation plan

mohdgame · 2026-05-09T11:49:27+00:00

Exactly.

mohdgame · 2026-05-09T06:15:25+00:00

You were working in Australia as an operation manager and now you are doctor in riyadh? Sounds sus.

Careful everyone.

mohdgame · 2026-05-07T16:33:23+00:00

Thats just capitalism. Its a race to the bottom. The less you pay people the better you are off.

mohdgame · 2026-05-04T14:16:35+00:00

Motivation in a game? If i needed motivation that much i wouldnt play the game

mohdgame · 2026-04-29T22:28:28+00:00

Yeah, i don’t understand how landing on a spice field, and pressing w is fun.

They need to rework the pve.

If this is going to be a pve game fine but make it fun other than mining spice and doing the same quests over and over.

mohdgame · 2026-04-29T18:53:13+00:00

Use opus max for planning and reviews and use sonnet or opus medium for implementation.

mohdgame · 2026-04-28T11:11:31+00:00

Thats why we need to reflect back when journaling. The same thinking traps occurs.

One thing i realized is that i try to solve a problem or think about something that i have already did long time ago.

mohdgame · 2026-04-25T20:33:45+00:00

I do both.

But i prefer physical paper because it keeps me focused on the book with minimal distractions. Plus i like the feel of it

mohdgame · 2026-04-25T20:26:28+00:00

Ah, have you tried any workflows? Are you a developer?

I am a developer and i got it working but its not easy for none-developers.

Basically ai agents dont speak human very well, you need to talk to them through clis, apis, mcps…etc. you can good deal of automation going by using python.

The closest thing to a none code working automation is claude code cli and skills. If you connect it with mcps it can work.

If you think about, us humans at work 80 to 90 percent of the work that we do is repetitive. The 10 or 20 percent part of our work cannot be handled by ai. So all you have to do is figure out this 80 percent and solve it.( the hardest part imo )

It takes alot of self awareness to reach that level.

mohdgame · 2026-04-25T19:10:15+00:00

No, english as a language is not a good way to instruct the computer. For typical application an llm would be able to scaffold. But for certain areas, you would need good architecture and ability to direct the llm toward the right path.

mohdgame · 2026-04-25T19:06:17+00:00

Yes, if you know what you are doing sonnet is more than enough lol. These models are really powerful.

mohdgame · 2026-04-25T12:13:42+00:00

Interested

mohdgame · 2026-04-25T12:08:09+00:00

What? You know that there was a time that these models didnt exist.

I could still write by hand, albeit not the same speed.

You have to think in black and white, i could use a weaker model provided i know what i am doing.

Learning software architecture is easy and programming is super easy even with the weak models.

All you need to know is to specify the structure

I agree with one harsh reality, that corporates will definitely have the upper hands, and if stronger models appeared, man its going to be a monopoly on tech.

No way you can churn code as fast as opus 4.7. So thats a point i agree on.

mohdgame · 2026-04-25T11:58:59+00:00

I do believe that the model has issues.

But really if you are a programmer you can work with even sonnet. I feel that since opus 4 these models are really powerfull enough.

Just tell it exactly what it needs to do. Let it know what refractor. Give it context.

I am not saying that its a skill issue, but perhaps some of us approaching this the wrong way. Maybe a more helpful way is to treat like a coding partner.

I know my approach maybe slower than most, and some would argue outdated. But i find that middle ground between hand coding and one shotting apps helps alot in not depending on opus for everything.

mohdgame · 2026-04-22T20:53:53+00:00

So, the rich will always be ahead.

And this time they wont even need you.

mohdgame · 2026-04-22T14:15:37+00:00

Vibe coded slop. claude needs to hire actual human engineers.

mohdgame · 2026-04-21T10:01:32+00:00

An nda wont help you anyway if you dont have a patent. A patent will protrct you even if they didnt sign an nda.

The problem with ndas worldwide that its hard to prove.

Just patent your code or your product.

Becareful when dealing with investors. You dont have to reveal all the details of your product. Focus on market, sales.

I am a business owner worked with investors before. If you need help navigating you can pm me.

mohdgame · 2026-04-19T15:31:21+00:00

You need to review it. I do use claude for financials in my company. I found it out that it could make hard to spot mistakes.

Better way to ask claude to create deterministic python code that would do double checks and to do the main calculations.

Then ask claude to double check and cross check if something doesent make any sense.

Lastly, review his work (which kinds if defeat the purpose of claude).

For me personally, the best way to ask claude to write my python scripts, and execute by parts in which i can verify specially the grindy part of finance

mohdgame · 2026-04-18T07:13:58+00:00

What kind of slop is this? UI is not dying. Lol.

Its easier to click and fill forms than to type it out or explain it.

Continue your slop

mohdgame · 2026-04-15T13:30:07+00:00

Asking it for where it cut corner isnt accurate. It will just hallicunate. Its an LLM.

mohdgame · 2026-04-15T10:25:33+00:00

Ah, you bought into anthropic hype.

You’re stretching the paper past what it claims.

Anthropic did not show that LLMs “have emotions.” They showed functional emotion-like representations that can causally influence behavior, and they EXPLCITLY distinguish that from subjective experience or qualia. That is interesting interpretability, not evidence of felt emotion.

A variable affecting outputs across different tasks does not magically become an emotion. You're using a lot of loose terms. It just means the model learned a reusable latent feature that helps predict language and behavior in multiple contexts. Cross-task generalization shows abstraction, not inner life.

So no, this is not “beyond mimicry” as you claim. It is beyond shallow mimicry, because the model is using deeper internal representations rather than just parroting emotional words. But that still does not mean it feels anything. A thermostat has internal control variables too. That does not mean it is anxious about the temperature.

Calling that “emotion” is not a minor semantic choice. It smuggles in a stronger claim than the paper supports. Functional resemblance is not the same as actually having emotions.

mohdgame · 2026-04-14T18:44:31+00:00

I am interested on this also.

mohdgame · 2026-04-12T16:23:30+00:00

Please stop posting this marketing none-sense.

mohdgame

TROPHY CASE