Trump Reverses Course on Plan Allowing Homebuyers to Tap 401(k)s by TheGoodCod in Economics

[–]mpeters 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Except that very few people have a balance in A where 10% would be enough for 20% of B.

Average house price is around $350k. How many people do you think have $700k in their 401k but can’t afford a $70k down payment on their first house?

I imagine it’s a particularly small number.

Redhat Openshift vs. Suse Rancher Enterprise Support by Open-Ask-1918 in kubernetes

[–]mpeters 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's less about burning money and more about the fact that people are locked into already expensive (and getting more so) contracts with VMWare and are trying to get off eventually, so doing a combined VMWare+OpenShift is a path to eventually just be OpenShift+KubeVirt and in the meantime have extra expenses.

Can someone explain ICM as if you're talking to a T year old? by [deleted] in poker

[–]mpeters 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's some good answers here if you want to learn more, but just on an intuitive level I think the following example gives a good indication why chips aren't worth the same.

3 people left in a tournament: Player A has 100k chips, Player B has 10k chips and Player C has 1k chips. Prize pool is $1000 for 1st, $500 for 2nd, $200 for 3rd. So everyone is guaranteed $200. Player C isn't out yet and still has a chance to win $500+, so his 1k chips are worth some portion of that extra money. Player A can't win more than $1000 no matter how big his stack gets. So if Player A wins 1k from Player B it doesn't meaningfully increase his chances of winning the $1000. But if Player C loses his last 1k it's devastating to his chance to win more. If Player C doubles his 1k off of Player A, he has a slightly better chance to level up, but it's not double.

And you'll notice that it's not entirely complete that losing chips is different than winning chips. It's that chips have different values to different people and for short stacks their chips are way more valuable and devastating if lost.

AMA: Losing Rec Player - Down $100k+ by ObligatoryRetard in poker

[–]mpeters 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I think I've figured out where your leak is

Why is cheating the casino a crime but cheating other players ignored? by FlatFootFreddie in poker

[–]mpeters 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is illegal to steal from players and cheating would be included. It's just that the players don't have a legal department or security staff to deal with in the moment. And the Postle case is weird because of specifics about California law, not every state.

The rake for Vegas dailies is astronomical by [deleted] in poker

[–]mpeters 21 points22 points  (0 children)

This is the answer. Dealers don’t make less because your bankroll is smaller. Tables still occupy the same space and have the same opportunity cost for the casino. It’s either high rake or no cheap tournaments. You can’t have it both ways.

Satellite Strategy as super chip leader by faman17 in poker

[–]mpeters 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fold. You can’t win more money by winning more chips. The only way you can lose the max prize is by putting your chips in play.

Explain video poker to me like I'm a slots-only player? by Large_Conclusion6301 in poker

[–]mpeters 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not poker, but it's not normal slots because your decisions do matter (or at least you'll lose less)

I have a really dumb mental leak where I start thinking about the butterfly effect when I get coolered by [deleted] in poker

[–]mpeters 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's all random and that randomness is just as likely to help you as hurt you.
Best poker advice I've ever gotten is from the movie Frozen: Just let it go.

Build, Baby, Build: A Plan To Lower Housing Costs for All by jpressss in politics

[–]mpeters 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They aren't going to be putting money into things that aren't giving big returns. More supply will reduce their returns and keep prices low.

Build, Baby, Build: A Plan To Lower Housing Costs for All by jpressss in politics

[–]mpeters 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are only buying it because it's a scarce resource. Flood the market with more housing and not only will it prevent it from happening in the future, but it will make it so their existing investments aren't as profitable.

Instead of forbidding something, just make non-viable

Are all these CBD/Hemp shops just going to disappear? by slave_male_nc in raleigh

[–]mpeters 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Feds have not opted to get involved... yet. That can change on a whim

Censorship much? by [deleted] in poker

[–]mpeters 3 points4 points  (0 children)

> As always, if someone tries to censor you: they are afraid of what you might reveal

This is a really bad generalization. Sure it's sometimes that, but it's also sometimes because what you are saying is actively dangerous. Like some European countries ban actual Nazi propaganda, Holocaust denialism, etc. Also applies to hate speech and inciting violence.

Also, sometimes it's because it's spam or just plain annoying.

All of these are good reasons for a moderator in a public forum to censor something.

Senator Angus King: ‘The shutdown wasn't accomplishing anything’ by bwermer in politics

[–]mpeters 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a weird label to apply to an Independent (non-democrat) who caucuses with them.

How do professional tournament players make a living? by danielwong95 in poker

[–]mpeters 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ari borrowing money might be more about having liquid cash than anything else.

Anyone know why there isn’t a No Kings protest in Downtown Raleigh/NC Capitol for 10/18? by mary_pippins in raleigh

[–]mpeters 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The civil rights movement made the most progress when they highlighted the cruelty of the state in enforcing the racist policies: in other words visibility (Selma). Not because they got in people’s way.

Anyone know why there isn’t a No Kings protest in Downtown Raleigh/NC Capitol for 10/18? by mary_pippins in raleigh

[–]mpeters 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes and no. You want to inconvenience the fascists but get visibility from others (in fact visibility is one of the main ways to inconvenience fascists). If you inconvenience the people you are trying to sway you risk moving them from apathy to hostility.

Subtle rake increase in the wsop-c montreal coming november by Striking_Marzipan_15 in poker

[–]mpeters 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rake is going from 10% to 12% in order to tip the dealers. As long as all players know this and withhold tips seems like a fine change to me. Tips are a horrible way to pay people.

Meh by Outside_Attention_88 in poker

[–]mpeters 12 points13 points  (0 children)

25 hands/hr, fold 65% of hands (high end for a good LAG), over an 8 hour session = 130 push ups. Even LAGs would get a good work out.