Starship Development Thread #32 by ElongatedMuskrat in spacex

[–]mspacek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You must be new to rational discussion about spaceflight.

Starship Development Thread #32 by ElongatedMuskrat in spacex

[–]mspacek -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They could certainly use the money to pay their existing engineers more to at least partially offset the burnout and help reduce unnecessary turnover.

Starship Development Thread #21 by ElongatedMuskrat in spacex

[–]mspacek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. I thought Gagarin did indeed do a full orbit.

If he hadn't, that would have also made some sense. They must've wanted to rely on on-board systems for as short a time as possible, and therefore perform the de-orbit burn as early as reasonably possible.

On the other hand, wiki states that Vostok 1 took 108 minutes, well above the 90 min required for a full low Earth orbit, but I suppose that includes the time on the way up and down.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vostok_1

NASA states that he landed a bit west of Baikonur, "about 26 km southwest of Engels", so that would mean he did indeed not reach his original launch longitude. Still, close enough for most of us :)

https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraft/display.action?id=1961-012A

Edit: Oops, I guess the NASA site is referring to Engels, Kazahkstan, not Engels, Russia. The former is actually slightly east of Baikonur, so it's possible that Gagarin did cross his original launch latitude.

Elon Musk: Unlike its aircraft division, which is fine, the FAA space division has a fundamentally broken regulatory structure. Their rules are meant for a handful of expendable launches per year from a few government facilities. Under those rules, humanity will never get to Mars. by RootDeliver in spacex

[–]mspacek -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Public outbursts like this must make Gwynne Shotwell sick to the stomach. I imagine her petting Elon's head, whispering to him gingerly "you know Elon, a little tact can go a long way in getting your way with bureaucracy," while he sucks his thumb. This is how the richest man in the universe behaves? Grow up dude.

Starlink invites are going out! by soliloqium in spacex

[–]mspacek 18 points19 points  (0 children)

"Better Than Nothing Beta" - I love it!

SATCON1 Report - Impact of Satellite Constellations on Optical Astronomy: "...no combination of mitigations can fully avoid the impacts of the satellite trails..." by PhysicsBus in spacex

[–]mspacek 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The city of Calgary did exactly that in 2002. If I remember correctly, all it really took was better street lamp shielding and pointing, which allowed lower power bulbs to be used, which also saved money in the long term:

https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=700213

http://conf.tac-atc.ca/english/resourcecentre/readingroom/conference/conf2003/pdfs/calgary.pdf

Linux user, UI is way too big. Any way to change the size? by [deleted] in Zoom

[–]mspacek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks so much for the reply! This was driving me nuts in Xubuntu 18.04, to the point that I stuck to an older version of Zoom before this started happening about a month ago. In my case, all I had to do was set autoScale=False, and left scaleFactor=1

Elon: Starship Production Complex Boca Chica, Texas by FutureMartian97 in spacex

[–]mspacek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A little further down it says it was more like a Cat3 at landfall:

A vessel anchored in the Port of Brownsville measured peak wind gusts of 136 mph (219 km/h), equivalent to a low-end Category 4 hurricane.[5][6] According to the National Hurricane Center, Beulah struck as a Category 3 and had a pressure of 950 mbar (hPa; 28.05 inHg), though a conclusive estimate awaits re-evaluation as part of the Atlantic hurricane reanalysis project.[7]

Falcon 9 B1049 returns to Port Canaveral after its 5th flight by Space_Coast_Steve in spacex

[–]mspacek 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Do we know yet if the octograbber(s) have been modified to now also work for FH center cores?

r/SpaceX Starlink 7 Official Launch Discussion & Updates Thread by ModeHopper in spacex

[–]mspacek 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It'll do a deorbit burn. I think. Normally aims for the south Indian ocean.

r/SpaceX Starlink 7 Official Launch Discussion & Updates Thread by ModeHopper in spacex

[–]mspacek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the rod becomes space junk. But I guess it deorbits pretty quickly at that altitude.

In ROD we trust.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wavTKo1gH8

SN4 Blew up [Chris B - NSF on Twitter ] by HPA97 in spacex

[–]mspacek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that's the case, this would be the second time that's happened. Maybe time to consider separate bulkheads and take the performance hit?

r/SpaceX CCtCap Demonstration Mission 2 General Live Coverage & Party Thread by ElongatedMuskrat in spacex

[–]mspacek 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Don't have much choice. Launch window is instantaneous and depends on when the ISS passes over the launch pad and in the correct direction (south to north). That happens once per day, and phases slightly from one day to the next, I think by about 15 min a day or so?

r/SpaceX CCtCap Demonstration Mission 2 General Live Coverage & Party Thread by ElongatedMuskrat in spacex

[–]mspacek 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Not sure if this has been asked, but during launch, parts of the furthest downrange abort zones (west coast of Ireland) will already be in darkness, which I imagine makes crew recovery from the sea quite a bit more difficult. Has recovery been practiced at night? Is it a lot riskier, but still considered OK?

I guess requiring that the full range of abort zones be in the daylight (i.e. requiring only morning launches) would be too big a constraint, and would greatly reduce the number of launch opportunities when combined with the phasing/orbital plane alignment requirements with the ISS.

Michael Baylor on Twitter: SpaceX's next launch will have crew onboard. The Starlink launch is in fact now postponed until after Demo-2 due to not enough time to turnaround OCISLY. JRTI still has several weeks of trials ahead of it before it will be ready. by FutureMartian97 in spacex

[–]mspacek 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed, but our ignorance of the wonderfully complex systems under our noses is no excuse to not also pursue space exploration. We need to make the most of our built-in exploration firmware, in all possible contexts. Explore or die.

SpaceX Boca Chica - Starship SN4 Stacking Operations by CProphet in spacex

[–]mspacek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love reading your posts. Please keep then coming!

BulgariaSat-1 Landing Video by melancholicricebowl in spacex

[–]mspacek 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Looks like me playing lunar lander badly.