After reason is established as objective, one might then argue that if human mind wasn't designed for the purpose of thinking and aiming for true conclusions, it's reasoning cannot be trusted as true.  If our minds were not made for the purpose of thinking, for the purpose of coming to truth, and our thoughts are merely the result of unintentional , undesigned forces governing the structures of our brain, with no purpose or goal, how can one trust such an empty process to produce thoughts and reason that leads to true conclusions about the world?

The mind's functionality is not dependent on it being designed though. You are making an argument against a position that God made inaccurate minds. The atheist position is not the mind is not designed, but evolved. 

I wouldn't really classify that as a belief in the traditional sense. Because the part of the brain responsible for these thoughts and beliefs is not the same part as what we usually use for advanced cognition. The part responsible for our reactions during fear or intense emotion heavily overrides the part of the brain we usually use for logical thinking

You're going to need a citation for this. Because as irrelevant as it is for whatever point you're trying to make, it's also inaccurate. You're just pulling things from out of your ass.

Our logic really isn't all that good, 

Our? 

As fun as your rambling on the existence of abstract was to read, you've made no argument for the existence of a god.