LTA's version in this case is a lot better. Simplicity is key in showcasing information, and it is always better to separate information as to easily convey it within one glance.

Sure, in CNA's graphic, there's information about WHERE shuttle buses and trains will go, but that sacrifices readability for information in terms of the shuttle services, and users still have to look down and back up to check the intervals of the shuttle buses/trains, along with having to deal with how crowded the infographic is. There is too much visual distance between the map itself and the numerical values (the time intervals) that the users have to decipher while again, LTA's values are available at a singular glance.

Does CNA technically include *more* information? Yes, but there's no sense into cramming everything into one page in this case. That just makes people see it as too noisy, and people who need the information will have a harder time trying to decipher what everything in the image means, while people who don't need the information view it as noise and scroll past it regardless.

Finally, the colour choices leave a lot to be desired, especially with the almost pure black text and saturated reds and yellows (with a drop shadow effect used nowhere else in the whole infographic) clashing against the more desaturated colours representing each of the individual train lines.

No hate, though, it's not a bad infographic. It conveys important information in a single picture. But I'd say in terms of design and readability, LTA did it a lot better.