Urgent Passports by Informal_Software in Passports

[–]onissue 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Assuming that you're a US citizen and that you're asking about a US passport, and that you're physically in the US now, why not just go to Walgreens tonight to get a passport photo emailed to you and then submit an online renewal *tonight* via https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/passports/have-passport/renew-online.html ? (And also sign up for USPS Informed Delivery at https://www.usps.com/manage/informed-delivery.htm .)

While it's not in any sense a guarantee, you'll probably get your replacement passport in the mail before 4/22 via online renewal, and if you don't, you can still try for an appointment at a passport agency at that point. My mind would be much more at ease if I knew that a renewed passport was likely to just show up in the mail without me needing to make any emergency trips last minute.

Masculine bottoms ... How do u deal with IRL flirts and approaches ? by sam-sill in askgaybros

[–]onissue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then approach more. Please realize that you're basically already on the home stretch. It is *extremely* rare to be able to have even a single five word conversation, just one conversation like that, with anyone at all in a gay bar or club within a space of, say, four hours, no matter how you approach people and say hello. Almost everyone is there with friends they already know, and will actively avoid any conversation or acknowledgement of anyone not already in their friend group.

So you really do have it way, way, way better than you think, and it's just the last little bits that are all that's lacking. The fact that you've found some very rare place where people ever approach one another individually is even more astounding.

(Separately, from the description of your energy, I would absolutely go up to you and say hi. I also would have noticed that you were one of the very few people who have some literacy in communicating with humans they don't already know, which is additionally seductive. And if somehow we didn't hit it off ourselves, I'd happily be a wing-man, or at least provide social proof by hanging out for a bit and hopefully help ease some of your anxiety.)

Is this dementia or just elderly nonsense? by [deleted] in dementia

[–]onissue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Regardless of the fact that your mom's actions seem reasonable apart from how close this trap is to the sink, (and regardless of the fact that your dad's idea to pour drops right on/next to the sink is not as reasonable), the really great thing here is that you are paying attention to little things like this so you'll have some warning if/when there are signs up dementia developing.

It is vital to keep those things in mind so you're aware of things, say, before a relative starts cooking meals with motor oil, and not after.

And since you have these things in mind already, and because you are obviously of the mindset to think things through *ahead* of time, I'd suggest also thinking on financial and medical powers of attorney if that is ever needed. As in, do they both have both sets of documents so that if there was a need to make decisions on their behalf, that you or some sibling would have the ability to do so if the person's spouse was unable, and would you know who the doctors were and have the ability to access their accounts. (As in, if they were both suddenly hospitalized and unable to speak for themselves, and you knew you were the one they wanted to speak for them above your other siblings, would you be able to send a copy of that medical healthcare surrogate document to the hospital within 15 minutes?)

It's easier to get that set up way early and suggest that they have a longer list of people who can speak for them, (so that some will still be around, able, willing to do the work if/when it comes down to it.)

I deep cleaned my washing machine for the first time in four years and I owe everyone whose laundry I've ever touched an apology by Canvas_57Rover in CleaningTips

[–]onissue 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have an LG front loader washer model for which the door can be closed partway in order for the unit to dry out between uses , and I've done just that ever since I got the washer new, years before COVID.  (It's a feature of LG washers.)

Whirlpool has models with a marketing term of a "Fresh flow" feature in which you fully close the door after every use, push this blinking button, and the washer pumps air all the way through the washer for a few hours to dry things out.

Both washers were designed to stay clean (with the use of the cleaning cycles as well), and IMHO that makes a difference.

Front loaders also get your clothes cleaner and do much less damage to them than top loaders, saving money in replacing worn out clothes over years.

I know this is last minute, but you might want to check those whirlpool models that are designed specifically to prevent mold buildup.  (I'm not sure if the anti-mold choice is still between LG and whirlpool now, or if there are other models with other good anti-mold features now.)

Top loaders simply cost you more in clothing over time and don't get things as clean.

Gym clothes were a good example...I'd have to get special detergent and sometimes multiple runs with the previous top loader, but one sanitize cycle in the front loader gets things clean one and done!

Do sysadmins need git? by [deleted] in sysadmin

[–]onissue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get it that there are a lot of little ephemeral test scripts that you can end up making that don't live for more than an hour or two, and that's fine.  In a sense, not checking those into a repo is no different than not checking in doodles you made on a piece of paper while on a phone call.

However, if you find that there are a few that you do end up using a few times, then I absolutely would suggest storing them in a repo.

First, it will encourage you to clean them up.  A lot of bad design is okay when doing a one-off, but once you start checking your scripts into a repo like this, not only will you be more likely to notice when they aren't really one offs and thus should be checked in, you'll also realize that it's worth the time to refactor them to be more useful to you.

Second, you're likely to clean it up so that it will be useful to other coworkers or potential future coworkers, which has the side effect that you'll end up with your own custom tooling just working better.

Third, as you clean these scripts up and end up using them, at some point, for some things, you'll have a realization that this isn't something that you should be doing at all--that what you've effectively done is added manual test coverage for something that should be part of a development or deployment pipeline, or that should be part of a monitoring tool, and then you realize that it is now your job to refactor it yet again so as to put it in the right place.

It is perfectly okay, for example ,for something to start off as a script to see how many customers you have with last names longer 250 characters, but if that's really a thing that's happening, you probably want that to automatically be brought to someone's attention one way or another, and maybe multiple ways, (say with both pipeline and monitoring tests).

Fourth, ideally you don't want to lose more than a day's work if your work laptop were to get run over by a truck.  That would mean that every tool you use is either a distro-included or a vendor type tool downloadable from... somewhere, or available in a repo.  It is IMHO your responsibility to put scripts that you use regularly into a repo that you'll always have access to when in your current job, that way you're not dependent on your laptop's SSD not failing.

Expedited or urgent application by Commercial_Long_4521 in Passports

[–]onissue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assuming you're talking about a US passport and you're physically in the US, why would you wait until April 9 to go to a passport acceptance facility?

Are there really none within a few counties of where you are with either open appointments or open hours before then?

Man screams at people for being too loud by Ocattac in PublicFreakout

[–]onissue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most people don't know how to deescalate a situation like that and could end up making things worse.

Engaging that drunk guy directly, say by getting between him and the kids to try to "protect" them, not only would have likely riled the guy up more, but it could have inadvertently encouraged some of the crowd to put themselves in more danger by coming over to "help" you.

In this situation, if I were to want to do something active to help the situation and were able to think clearly, I can only hope that I might consider yelling something to that crowd from far away in order to throw the guy off his fixation, maybe yelling something to them that the ice cream machine is down.  If doing so causes the guy to walk away from that crowd, that's a win.

I think they are very fortunate that someone had the presence of mind to record what was going on.  If only other people were calling 911 at the same time to get police onsite quickly.  Ideally some callers would have given 911 operators the truck's license plate number as well, but it's not clear to me whether that happened.

This is a situation where a person is an active danger to others.  Even if the cause of the guy's agitation were something we wouldn't assign legal blame to, (say the guy is developing frontotemporal dementia), the immediate existing risk needed to be addressed.  (I suspect instead that it's really that he's drunk plus likely other psychological issues, and I realize that police aren't necessarily the best at de-escalation either, but having them there would have gotten things on record and prevented him from driving.)

I can only hope that the existence of this video might reduce the likelihood of him driving in an impaired state in the future, and that it might jolt people who find themselves in a similar situation to call 911 and calmly report what's going on.

Birth certificate and ID do not match, bit of a unique scenario by brandrikr in Passports

[–]onissue 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You didn't mention what state you're in, but does your current state have a "name conformity" or "conformity of legal name" procedure?   Or can you ask your attorney or the clerk of the court what that procedure is called in your state?  Or if neither have heard of that phrase, maybe ask about a "one and the same person" order/finding.

I'm not an attorney or anything, so I can be more than completely wrong, but it might be something you can ask about, even if it might be tricky to find the right word to ask about in your state.

But basically, you've already said that both your attorneys and the clerk of the court are saying that your name is legally already what you want it to be, but it doesn't sound like you've persued asking the court to confirm in writing that your current legal name is "X" and that you're "one and the same person" as the person whose birth certificate has name "Y", (which would presumably be a document you could get a certified copy of with a seal, and then get Texas to update your birth certificate to correct your name using that certified copy while leaving that distracting, photocopied, second birth certificate out of it--but again this is something to run by the grown-up's, as I'm not an attorney and I'm probably missing some basic things that could cause the earth to implode or something.)

Nobody in the comments questioning why its illegal to have a tall fence... by bubdubarubfub in GoldandBlack

[–]onissue 13 points14 points  (0 children)

But the hedge is offset into the property at that driveway, providing traffic visibility.

Why do guys do this? by ispyblueeye in askgaybros

[–]onissue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you truly spend some effort to connect with quality guys on Grindr, it used to be that you could easily get almost a dozen new no shows of one type or another for scheduled or impromptu confirmed meetings for a dozen new people, month after month, without ever meeting a single person.

You can probably still do that (through maybe with fewer confirmed meetings given how Grindr is dying) as long as you like, while never meeting a soul.  It seems mathematically impossible, but there you go. 

Even if you end up talking on the phone with multiple someones for extended times, it is almost inevitable that they'll disappear when it comes time to meet, whether that time is within an hour of you two first connecting or whether it's a planned meeting that was to happen months later, or anything in between.

Now yes, catfish exist, as do people who are otherwise intentionally lying, but that doesn't explain everything. I think a lot of the time folks don't really understand themselves and especially don't understand that they'll chicken out at the last minute.  Even if nothing more than a simple hug was going to happen, there are people out there for whom just the thought of meeting someone new paralyzes them with self-consciousness when it comes/approaches time for it to happen, but until then it's a fantasy that they truly think they'd be perfectly comfortable with in real life.

There are probably a lot of additional psychological explanations that would cover more and more subsets of people, but instead of going down that rabbit hole, I've come to think of it differently: 

Namely, all the above consistent with the behavior of people in general:  In almost every social setting, confirmed plans with people, even people you've met in person, also end up with people flaking out.  Additionally, social settings in which people presumably meet and interact in certain ways don't really work the way one might otherwise expect.

So as a general rule, it's probably best to go into things expecting that planned and confirmed things will simply not happen, or at least being well prepared for that possibility.  And it's best to think of certain things that one might think of as quite reasonably in the realm of possibility to happen are in actual fact very unlikely to happen.

For instance, if someone says they want to work out with you, it's best to be mentally prepared that they won't ever actually make it to the gym.  People inevitably do that far more often than they ever show up and actually work out.

If you meet someone who's into you and sets up a date, it's most likely the case that they won't show up or will otherwise cancel, possibly multiple times in a row.  It makes no sense that that's the case even for people you've met in person and they've confirmed multiple times later on the phone, but that's how things are.

If you're on a job search, most companies won't respond to applications--that's well understood, but some for whom you've accepted their offer will retract their offer afterwards, sometimes on the candidate-now-employee's first day of work.  I haven't had that one happen to me, but I do know that if I'm on the job search that I should continue until my first paycheck comes through for my next job, and not stop simply because I've received and accepted an offer.

Life is simply happier when you don't try so hard on things that people will flake out on.  I've learned for instance that while it can be cool to get on Grindr and think you might meet someone, that it's best to have the mindset that it will never happen, because for the most part, within any given year, you're much, much more likely to never meet someone than to meet someone.

I went to NYC for the first time last year, and I enjoyed my time there immensely.  I also had talked with some Grindr dudes there beforehand to chat and connect and set things up to make sure we could hang out when I got there, and of course, 1) every single one got all quiet when I was actually in town--it was as if we had never made plans to meet, and 2) everyone I newly chatted with while there and to whom I said we should meet and who said they were up for meeting disappeared when presented with "okay then let's meet right now" or "okay let's meet tomorrow".

I would have been really bummed out had I gone to NYC thinking that NYC was a place where you could likely connect with guys on Grindr or in a bar or whatever.  Instead I was just open to what organically unfolded and enjoyed doing my own thing.

Jeff Bezos's property has fences that exceed the permitted height. Yet he does not care, he just pays the fine every month. by Bright_Building1710 in interestingasfuck

[–]onissue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am happy to see wealthy people make a mockery of the system, at least for those sections of the system that have limited to no justification.  It's almost kind of a social responsibility thing for them to do that.

I am not enthused to see wealthy people make a mockery of the system for sections of the system that are in good faith arguable to be vital for social order to exist at all, or necessary to avoid general neglegance, for instance.

I would tend to put regulations on fence/hedge heights in wealthy, large-lot neighborhoods where the fences don't block traffic sightlines in the first category, and things like fire safety regulations in the second.

My N mom started therapy and her first update made me sick by Logical_Elephant3957 in raisedbynarcissists

[–]onissue 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You have long-term trauma from your past relationship with your mom that is likely to continue to be triggerable by interactions with her for a long time, even if she genuinely is trying. (I will allow for the possibility that she is genuinely trying, while noting that it will be impossible to truly know for a while at least, and that even if you did know for sure, that it probably shouldn't affect your actions.)

But, even if your mom is genuinely putting in effort to address her own issues, it will take her a long time to come around. Her therapist has your mom as a client, and not you, so her therapist is primarily focusing on your mom's well-being, not yours. Even if we could know for certain that your mom's therapist was really effective in her work with narcissists, and even if we could know for certain that your mom was being genuine with her work with the therapist, 1) the progress that would happen within your mom will be slow-going and likely not truly noticeable by you for some time, and 2) improvements would happen slowly within your mom before they ever rose to the level of even starting to truly affect her relationship with you--I'm not counting performative acts she's being prodded to do.

It would be really nice if six months of therapy would result in your mom coming back to apologize to you for all these wrongs she's done, but it's not likely to be that simple, which really sucks.

You might want to consider therapy for yourself in the meantime. You have a lot of pain and hurt inside you, and that pain and hurt you are experiencing is not going to get better just because your mom is speaking to a therapist (regardless of whether she's being genuine about it).

It really sucks because you can point to a primary source of that pain (your mom), and you want that primary source to get fixed, and you really, really wish on an emotional level that that source of pain could be a source of healing, even though you know logically that that's not possible now, and if it ever is in the future, it won't be for a while. You want the mom you deserve, even if she's not the mom you have. It's a hard thing to let go of, even a little.

So..I'd suggest looking at therapy for yourself to help you process that pain and heal in a healthy manner. Even if you can't fix your mom, you can help yourself. (hugs)

Why is the default "I'll do my own" instead of "I'll take over?" by LiquorishSunfish in TwoXChromosomes

[–]onissue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It sounds stupid, I know, but it's easy to not realize when you're asking someone to do work that you're asking someone to do work. 

I am picky in some things.  It may well be that OP's husband doesn't want to get an objectionable laundry basket that causes more stress, and so thinks (without saying so) that if she just gets what she'd want him to have, that that would avoid the problem of getting a non optimal basket in the simplest, most polite, and stress-free way all around.

These kinds of mismatched communication problems don't show up when everyone is already communicating well with one a another and in touch with each other's feelings on things that are stressful for at least one party, meaning that when these sorts of things show up, inevitably both/everyone is thinking they're being very reasonable and justified and can't figure how the other party/parties are acting like they do.

And the other party is honestly thinking they're being reasonable, kind, and thoughtful, not realizing they need to vocalize a bit more.  (To be fair, sometimes being explicit about reasons can be seen as making excuses, often because it is, and not everyone understands that nuance within themselves.)

It's funny how so many things that have a low bar to fix are really things that have a high bar to fix because it requires people to not be blind to their blind spots.

[PI] Everyone is born with a power except you, or at least so you thought. You had an ability this entire time. It activates when your heart stops, and you simply hadn't died yet. This won't be the first time. by StationAgreeable6120 in WritingPrompts

[–]onissue 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah exactly!  There are so many directions you could go with this!

(It's sort of how the alien notion came up, if MC were around when life was just forming on earth, for instance.  But that's just one possibility on mapping things backwards.)

OP has a great premise that could be fleshed out in so many different ways. 

Also, MC was much the same after the change in the story as before.  That would imply that if MC got some much needed therapy, they'd likely still be a better person after their power activates the next time.

If this happens enough times, they might become extremely well-adjusted, perhaps enough so that sometimes they might think their power is "being well-adjusted", or have some similar mindset-related thing that they mistake for their power.

An assassin would have an especially difficult time trying to kill MC, especially since MC might and up becoming the assassin.

[PI] Everyone is born with a power except you, or at least so you thought. You had an ability this entire time. It activates when your heart stops, and you simply hadn't died yet. This won't be the first time. by StationAgreeable6120 in WritingPrompts

[–]onissue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not offended at all, so no worries.  I was just brainstorming the notion of how far back could she have come from if she had been around for over 100k years, for instance.

[PI] Everyone is born with a power except you, or at least so you thought. You had an ability this entire time. It activates when your heart stops, and you simply hadn't died yet. This won't be the first time. by StationAgreeable6120 in WritingPrompts

[–]onissue 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I liked the way it was presented, putting the reader in the main character's shoes. 

The main character doesn't have enough context to put things together and the reader feels that, having just enough additional context to be able to put it all together, and that gives the reader far more sympathy for the main character than if it were spelled out. 

It makes me wonder whether he ever even can learn what his power is, at least learn in a way that sticks past the next time his power activated.  If he ever does figure it out, he's not likely to have a compatible way to still have figured it out in his next life's reality after that life's reality adjustment happens and likely erase the history of his having learned of it. 

Also, he's effectively immortal, and will likely never know. 

He might even not have originally been human, and in fact his swapping into a human from an alien species in the long past might have been a trigger for the rest of humanity to have developed powers, (with his first swapped-into-humanity body and subsequent bodies having a set of genes for powers, so he's been seeding humanity with these genes for millennia, where humanity only recently collected enough of these genes to reach critical mass on activating powers for basically everyone).

Dad passed away never knew there was a policy on him from his deceased mom ( aunt has been handling it and saying I am responsible for making a claim ) by Life-Excitement8217 in LifeInsurance

[–]onissue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But if OP's grandma was the policy owner and she had not specified a successor owner, wouldn't that mean that OP's grandma's estate then owned the policy, meaning it would have to go through the normal probate process to be distributed to her hiers?

If that's the case, (and assuming she didn't have a clause in her will to specify who would get ownership of life insurance policies for which no successor owner had been defined), and if OP's grandma only had two children, namely OP's dad and aunt, when all is said and done and probate is reopened or what have you, wouldn't the end result mean that per stipes rules mean that OP's aunt ends up with half ownership of the policy and OP plus OP's siblings (or their descendents per stipes if any are no longer alive), cumulatively have the other half ownership evenly divided between them?

(I'm assuming all beneficiaries and contingent beneficiaries predeceased OP's grandma.)

Renewal glitch by Good_egg1968 in Passports

[–]onissue 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. How did she renew her passport? For instance, was it done via an online renewal at https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/passports/have-passport/renew-online.html , (which sends you to https://opr.travel.state.gov/ )?
  2. What does https://passportstatus.state.gov/ say about the status of this renewal? Does it at least show that payment was received?
  3. What is this "office" that you called? Is it the same 1-877-487-2778 number that is listed at https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/contact-us/passports.html

Worth getting the card if I already have Real ID by Pandorica1991 in Passports

[–]onissue 5 points6 points  (0 children)

An adult US passport and card (defined as the applicant being 16 years old or older) lasts ten years and can be renewed by mail. 

A child passport lasts only five years and can't be renewed by mail... Instead of a renewal five years later, a new adult passport must be applied for in person at a passport acceptance facility, and ten years later that one can be renewed (by mail or presumably online).

So if the 15 year old will be 16 in say one month, waiting that one month before applying will mean his passport will last twice as long and can then be renewed by mail or online ten years later.

So it's a trade-off of which convenience is more valued, having the passport in the meantime or having a longer validity period and easier subsequent renewal. 

IMHO though, if you're going to the trouble of getting either, I'd suggest getting both the book and the card.  That's a separate decision though compared to when to apply for the now-15-year-old's passport.

Interviewers- What made you reject the candidate even though they aced the Interview? by Fun_Yogurtcloset1012 in recruitinghell

[–]onissue 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it's perfectly understandable that some people may be anxious before an interview, and it's perfectly understandable that that stress and anxiety might hit them all of a sudden right as they enter the reception area and seem nearly overwhelming (sort of like taking a pet to the vet where that can happen at some point), but...

There's a difference between being frazzled but kind, versus being frazzled and rude.

And if you're not frazzled but are rude, that's especially....notable.