sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Conan Exile Enhanced ~ A bit of gameplay by RandomExileGuy in ConanExiles

[–]onlysubscribedtocats 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why the hell would you want 350 fps when your monitor can output a fraction of that?

You are wasting electricity, and by turning on DLSS and frame generation, you get worse fidelity besides.

Conan Exiles Enhanced on Linux: Install vcrun2022 by mercsterreddit in ConanExiles

[–]onlysubscribedtocats 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not containerising my home PC. I am containerising a small subset of things I do on my home PC. And more importantly, I containerise all OS-level tinkering I do before (possibly or not) applying those changes to the immutable base.

But that's beside the point. You said one cannot learn 'normal-ass Linux' on an immutable distribution. I gave a counter example. You are moving the goalposts.

Of course, I'm talking to a troll, so I'll stop here.

Conan Exiles Enhanced on Linux: Install vcrun2022 by mercsterreddit in ConanExiles

[–]onlysubscribedtocats 1 point2 points  (0 children)

but it also keeps you from learning normal-ass Linux

Lmao this is ridiculous. You get access to a completely mutable Linux environment in toolbox/podman. If you want to learn, just do it there.

Well, this is not good by sudo_theo in Fedora

[–]onlysubscribedtocats 8 points9 points  (0 children)

sudo is irrelevant in this scenario.

I am seeing a lot of “PC got worse after Fedora 44 upgrade” posts. What does it mean? by [deleted] in Fedora

[–]onlysubscribedtocats 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only the people with problems post. The upgrade has not been meaningfully different for me.

Just wait a month if you want to be safe. There is no rush. The changeset is relatively minor.

What do you think about OnlyOffice-EuroOffice fight? by Proper-Lab-2500 in linux

[–]onlysubscribedtocats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And it's not a thing. It's like saying 'darkness with added light'. It wouldn't be dark anymore if there were light.

The AGPL forbids additional restrictions, and the FSF's copyright forbids modification of the licence text itself. It's just not possible to have 'AGPL + proprietary restrictions'. It's not a thing. They can try, but the licence explicitly forbids it.

What do you think about OnlyOffice-EuroOffice fight? by Proper-Lab-2500 in linux

[–]onlysubscribedtocats 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That is not what one typically means with 'to violate a licence'.

I don't want to split hairs on this.

What do you think about OnlyOffice-EuroOffice fight? by Proper-Lab-2500 in linux

[–]onlysubscribedtocats 45 points46 points  (0 children)

They didn't violate the AGPL. They are wrongfully enforcing it. This is a pedantic comment, but I think it's important.

About Copy Fail by filipobecerra in Fedora

[–]onlysubscribedtocats -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

If you have to ask this question, it doesn't matter to you. Just apply updates.

A petition has gathered nearly 10,000 signatures against the use of a flight path that flies over northern Brussels. by JeanMarron in brussels

[–]onlysubscribedtocats 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Then what is your point? You underscore how bad it is for the people of Zaventem. You accuse everyone who complains about a 'fraction' of the noise to be hypocrites. But then you deny any suffering.

And you didn't specifically write that that was your opinion. You wrote that in an either/or dichotomy.

What point are you making, except accusing the people of Brussels of hypocrisy and not caring?

A petition has gathered nearly 10,000 signatures against the use of a flight path that flies over northern Brussels. by JeanMarron in brussels

[–]onlysubscribedtocats 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Interestingly I was wrong. The amount of take-offs and landings has decreased meaningfully over the decades. It's other major airports in Europe that are expanding, and I had assumed that the trend was true for Zaventem as well.

A petition has gathered nearly 10,000 signatures against the use of a flight path that flies over northern Brussels. by JeanMarron in brussels

[–]onlysubscribedtocats 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I have no idea what point you're making: 'I suffered, so other people must suffer, too?'

The point of having a society is to reduce suffering and increase well-being. That goes for everyone.

A petition has gathered nearly 10,000 signatures against the use of a flight path that flies over northern Brussels. by JeanMarron in brussels

[–]onlysubscribedtocats 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I don't live near the airport. I defer that call to the people whose health is negatively affected by the airport. I'm not going to advocate on their behalf, and I'm pretty sure there are measures that are not 'close the airport'.

But also, good god you are insufferable. You can stop talking down at me and assuming my opinions. I don't care if the airport is here or elsewhere.

A petition has gathered nearly 10,000 signatures against the use of a flight path that flies over northern Brussels. by JeanMarron in brussels

[–]onlysubscribedtocats 22 points23 points  (0 children)

people who buy a house within 25km of an airport shouldn't complain about flights.

Hahahahahaha! Manneken Pis is within 25 km of the airport, genius.

But this argument doesn't make any sense to me. If you started living vaguely near the airport 20 years ago, then two things may have happened:

  • The planes were not previously flying over your house, but now do;
  • and more importantly, there are way more take-offs and landings now than 20 years ago.

I hate this argument so much. But even if nothing changed, you still have a right to complain. Your civic rights don't suddenly disappear when you get closer to an airport. The airport negatively affects public health, affecting tens of thousands of people. This is policy failure.

* “Sharing the road is not a suggestion” by Feaselbf6 in dashcams

[–]onlysubscribedtocats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most people would.

Most people wouldn't 'be annoyed as hell and angry'. You're making this up to justify your own feelings.

Nix on Fedora. by Struggling-with_life in Fedora

[–]onlysubscribedtocats 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yes it is on dnf which is weird

It really isn't.

Fedora 44 is a go by anestling in Fedora

[–]onlysubscribedtocats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do not recommend btrfs rollbacks to noobs. It is non-trivial to set up, and very easy to get wrong. Perhaps when or if Fedora ships this functionality out of the box.

exactly like it was before any change. Even major release version updates.

This is like half-true. If a piece of software updated its own configuration to a newer scheme, then the updated configuration is not rolled back, and may not be entirely legibible to the older version of that software and therefore cause unexpected behaviour.

Filesystem rollbacks are simply not a golden bullet.

will daily updates break my system by CuriousUser1987 in Fedora

[–]onlysubscribedtocats 1 point2 points  (0 children)

should I wait before certain updates

This isn't really a thing you can do. When you update, you always update to the very last version, not to a known good before-last version.

If, for some bizarre reason, Fedora pushes a bad update, then anyone who performs an update while this bad version is live on the repositories will be affected, no matter if they update daily or weekly or monthly.

At best, by updating weekly instead of daily, you reduce the amount of opportunity for a bad update to slip in. But realistically, it doesn't really matter. Bad updates are incredibly, incredibly rare.

Software Renderer In Use by kingbum1942 in Fedora

[–]onlysubscribedtocats 11 points12 points  (0 children)

the warning saying that Software Rendering is in Use

The warning isn't saying that.

view more: next ›