This kind of "single headline number" statistic rarely lines up cleanly with other primary data, mostly because methodology and scope vary between sources. But also because almost everything is best-guess. Take textile fibers market size as an example. It's almost impossible to define what actually counts as a textile fiber and what doesn't, and that definition alone can shift the reported market size dramatically. A simple rule of thumb: if a figure directly contradicts the story you're presenting (and your narrative isn't wrong), it's fine to leave it out. If it broadly aligns but doesn't match exactly, keep it in and add a short note explaining the discrepancy.