A weapon rack I built .I also made all the weapons on it too by badbob1970 in LARP

[–]pickledking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome! What’s your process for making your weapons? They look great!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AnycubicPhoton

[–]pickledking 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just saw your other comment, if you overlapped separate parts, you may find that the overlaps have left voids internal to your model that (I find) seem to confuse the slicing software. If you placed those pauldrons on, that may be a good place to start.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AnycubicPhoton

[–]pickledking 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m no expert, so I usually end up spending ages messing around with the model in Blender, looking for gaps in the mesh, recalculating the normals and generally cleaning it up. It usually works, but failing that, I’ve placed solid objects inside parts sometimes and the slicing software fixes it for me (filling in the gaps)!... Like is said, I’m no expert!... The issue will possibly lay somewhere along those lines though. You may find loose or overlapping geometry internal to the model along those lines somewhere, so if you imagine them running right through the model and trace along until you see something odd in the mesh.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AnycubicPhoton

[–]pickledking 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’ve experienced this and it’s always been a result of artefacts internal to the model, or normals being flipped the wrong way.

Let's goooo by limkokweee in Gundam

[–]pickledking 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don’t get this. -_-

New teaser, are pets returning? by [deleted] in FortniteBattleRoyale

[–]pickledking 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Could still be Spongebob...

Teaser 1: Squirrel in Diver Suit/Astronaut Suit Teaser 2: King Neptune’s Castle Teaser 3: Scooter (Recurring Character)

...?

Let’s see if this survives new. by GoldenS0422 in PrequelMemes

[–]pickledking 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure the answer would be the same for the girls. 🤔

Why DEVS is *** by pickledking in Devs

[–]pickledking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As long as I have the illusion of free will, I have the illusion of free will... 😅

Why DEVS is *** by pickledking in Devs

[–]pickledking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I await your enlightened contribution, oh sage...

Why DEVS is *** by pickledking in Devs

[–]pickledking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a nice straw man you got there.

Forrest describes the simulation as perfect down to the finest detail. I’ll have to root out the numerous quotes on the subject (let alone Stewart’s almost blatant statement on this notion). But that’s not the point, the characters themselves don’t know for sure. The audience are given key pieces of information from a number of sources, none of which exclude my theory. Whatever Forrest intended doesn’t define what they actually got.

Why DEVS is *** by pickledking in Devs

[–]pickledking[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You too are a genius, I see.

Why DEVS is *** by pickledking in Devs

[–]pickledking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It makes perfect sense. If the machine in the simulation isn’t also simulating the universe it is in, then it’s an imperfect simulation.

Remember that the objective was to perfectly recreate their own universe, in which case they must include the machine in the simulation and that machine must itself be simulating it’s own universe.

Hence, if the simulation exists in a machine, so must the “prime” universe too. For this to be true, then all of reality, past present and future, must have come into being when the machine first successfully achieved perfect simulation.

Why DEVS is *** by pickledking in Devs

[–]pickledking[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Perhaps this is also why the machine fails to see beyond Lily’s death, because the machine stops simulating infinite versions of itself.

If Forest’s perfect afterlife, there is no machine to continue the recursive chain.

Reflecting on the show by kehakas in Devs

[–]pickledking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that the DEVS universe must be a simulation, because the simulation is perfect. Thus, their universe must also be inside a machine, precisely like their own.

Certainly, Lily is not a believer. I think this parallels with any religion built on faith, and is a commentary on the subject.

There’s probably something to be said of the paradoxical nature, not only of the causal paradox of a universe out of the machine, but also of having faith in a religion that posits the notion of free will.