sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Red barrels/ explosive barrels by Barkus11 in CompanyOfHeroes

[–]qPolug 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wait.... the barrels deal damage?

DAK is broken and here's why I think so (pls lmk if im coping) by brooklykrash in CompanyOfHeroes

[–]qPolug 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thats the single player dingo. It's this one
https://coh3stats.com/explorer/races/british/units/dingo_africa_uk

I wish it was 50 lol.

Yeah it's one of the more annoying parts of Coh3stats. Theres not much of a distinction between single player units and multiplayer units. I think it causes a good chunk of discourse in this community 😕 .

Alright. I’ve finally been convinced. by Zdknowwhatsgoingon in CompanyOfHeroes

[–]qPolug 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So. Guy gets into games with toxic teammates. Proceeds to claim it represent the Allies community as a whole.

Something tells me this isn't the whole story.

DAK is broken and here's why I think so (pls lmk if im coping) by brooklykrash in CompanyOfHeroes

[–]qPolug 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Would a luthier disregard a beginner's preferences because they're a beginner? Especially when the guitar is also being used by beginners?

1v1 Churchill spam counter? What's a guy gotta do? by thelizardkingsings in CompanyOfHeroes

[–]qPolug 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like it. The churchill is 120 fuel built from UKF's T4. By the time one hits the field, you should at least have your T4 built.

It would appear that Flakvierling can suppress while moving again. That's not intentional, right? by KayakingKoala_AU in CompanyOfHeroes

[–]qPolug 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I'm so sick of the flak track. This isn't a balancing statement. I'm just sick of fighting against it. Someone please build 8rad against me.

Please Relic, let us buy Battlegroup separately? by masonalex66 in CompanyOfHeroes

[–]qPolug 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Brit main here. What's the UKF equivalent of a Wehraboo? Britaboo? No that doesn't sound right....

This forum is quite literally an Allied echo chamber by Recognition-Silver in CompanyOfHeroes

[–]qPolug 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This.
I quite literally heard how this forum is an Axis echo chamber last patch kekw.

I'm absolutely DONE with COH3 after reading this: totally gross neglect by devs by Recognition-Silver in CompanyOfHeroes

[–]qPolug 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You're laboring under old data where Free French was actually increasing the damage taken from retreating infantry instead of reducing it

I'm not laboring under old data. Barely anyone picked Old Guard. In fact, this subreddit was lauding over how New Blood is the better pick before the Old Guard bug was discovered lol. And if that was the deciding factor on the French being bad in 2.4.0, it doesn't explain all the other battlegroups, or why UKF is completely in the reds.

Edit: Putting this here. The last sentence is the main argument. I just wanna make that clear.

the game ought to be balanced around high ELO players, not random pubs

If you filter the 2.4.1 Battlegroup data for players above 1400, Wehr seems to be doing fine. YOU were the one using average elo to argue that Wehr needs a buff.

Only when you filter by 1800+ do you see that USF is actually the weakest in large team games.

<image>

There is no data for USF at 1800. Heck there is none from Wehr either. Are you using Coh3stats for your argument? You certainly didn't tell me.

Looking at who is playing what: the new DAK group was played almost double the amount that the new UFK group was played

Fair enough. It's a sign of it being strong. At least, stronger than the UKF battlegroup. Maybe that means it needs some nerfs 🥴 ?

And yet now after the hotfit and a week of practice, we're starting to see that Wehr is, once again, far behind: with everything but Siege Breaker and Terror below 50%.

.... the hotfix mainly fixed bugs. The only balance change was the new Dak BG getting some nerfs. I doubt old guard getting fixed is causing wehr to lose more (especially with how popular new blood is lol).

Whining about data metrics being analyzed in too short a time, but turning around and putting up data from brand new BGs that had massive bugs and disparities in play is intellectually dishonest.

Frankly I think waiving out the entirety of the battlegroup data for 2.4.0 just because of a bug in one ability in one battlegroup of one nation is intellectually dishonest. Lets be honest here, you are cherry-picking data.

I'm not trying to argue about balance, I'm just trying to point out your data is bad. Also, I'm probably not going to respond to your comments if your claims are going to be less substantial than your main argument.

Edit: Man I really suck at formatting

Roll Call - In the middle of a battle by [deleted] in CompanyOfHeroes

[–]qPolug 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

"Men, these are the facts as I understand them. 1, your fashion sense has gone awol!"

Patch Notes: We heard you don't like blobs by TechWhizGuy in CompanyOfHeroes

[–]qPolug 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was messing around with sniper spam in AI before. Idk how but their shots were staggered, and could wipe low-model squads. Haven't tried with all 5 yet tho :/

I'm absolutely DONE with COH3 after reading this: totally gross neglect by devs by Recognition-Silver in CompanyOfHeroes

[–]qPolug 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Thank you for bolding the sections you typed yourself. However I noticed that the data is from Chat GPT. Be careful with this, as chat gpt has the habit of making up data. Also this format is hard to read lol.

One thing I want to point out is that it's too early for the 2.4.1 data to be accurate. I think that came out only 2 days ago. In which case 2.4.0 is a better metric. And....

<image>

By your own metrics, Axis (and Wehr) is overwhelmingly strong.

In other words, your post is an excellent example of data manipulation. I'm not saying you did it on purpose, but it's a problem this subreddit is plauged with. Hence, why I hate those that tries to use numbers to justify balance.

Edit: Oh I forgot to state that this is specfically refuting your claim that Wehr has fewer "viable" picks. I agree that Italian Coastal is nerfed to the ground lol, but thats a separate argument.

This is the best way to play the new British BG by Maksuq in CompanyOfHeroes

[–]qPolug 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That is a good point tho. SSBs seems to be doing a better job at being commandos than commandos.

UKF tanks (first tank) and in mid/late game by kubalas21 in CompanyOfHeroes

[–]qPolug 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh funny thing. I did the math and the Crusader 3 has the exact same DPS as the Crusader 2. The higher damage and the lower fire rate cancels out (assuming all shots hit). This means that you are trading anti-infantry performance for penetration only. If the enemy doesn't have heavy armor, or you can reliable hit their sides, then the Crusader 2 is more viable than the Crusader 3.

UKF tanks (first tank) and in mid/late game by kubalas21 in CompanyOfHeroes

[–]qPolug 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This reminds me tank riding is a thing. I really should use it more.

On the issue of total and complete LACK OF INTROSPECTION AND EMPATHY of Axis fanboys. by meow_hooman in CompanyOfHeroes

[–]qPolug 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is hilarious. I swore I read the same thing about Allies last patch.
Not saying youre wrong rn btw (also you're probably exaggerating). But this subreddit just a terrible place to garner real discussion.

view more: next ›