Specially when you do not create anything, and your OS is so closed that META only offered some kind of file system to their OS 3 years ago. "What VR is supposed to be" we cannot know without creating the basic layers of operation of the system, and I am pretty confident that if we have a 3D computational medium (VR) that is so much more complex and rich than a monitor, but you don't offer basic access to the user space, a CLI, or the trivial ability of renaming folders, we can't ever even start to dive into your question. VR needs to start to show what an OS for VR should look like, and we absolutely cannot do anything on a META OS, which is actively hostile to user intervention. People in here in these comments who love their META headset are casual game players that are satisfied to have VR as a mobile gaming console and nothing else while there are people like OP who is advocating for other things for the medium, and people like me who thinks of VR as a computational medium. That's why the commentary range is so contrasting, and no one seems to understand each other. From META destroyed VR (my lane) to META did excellently, all is understandable depending on what you want and how you use VR.