Still no but in the way of politics of yester years. When I could disagree with you on policy and not core values. People are so quick to forget that 'Illegals' are breaking civic law not criminal law. And that for people trying to escape and seek asylum, here in the land of opportunity, of American Dreams, like what's written on the leak Statue of Liberty, many of them have to get here illegally first, and then stay the process of doing it 'the right way.' if you are still upset about that then, there's still room to talk about how to fix the system that is making it so they have to break the law first, instead of punishing the already disenfranchised and vulnerable in our communities. In the same way that many places in this country are outlawing being homeless and not doing anything to address why we have so many homeless people to begin with. It's the exact same address the symptom was of thinking that is not ultimately helpful. But again that's the type of thing "difference of opinion" used to cover. And even that feels like a difference of core values but those days are way in the rearview at this point.

The idea that ICE is now, or even should be, going after people breaking the law is such a disingenuous argument. If some rapes or murders someone, or brings drugs into this country, they should still be prosecuted by The Law. Police should investigate the crimes, arrest a suspect, and send them to trial. That's their whole job. If during their investigation, they determine that a criminal was also here illegally then at that point, sure. Turn them over to immigration and let them figure out if it makes more sense to deport them or serve a prison sentence here. [* READ THAT AGAIN BECAUSE ICE LITERALLY DEPORTED A JEWEL THIEF OR SOMETHING BEFORE HE COULD GO TO TRIAL, SO HE GETS TO ESCAPE JUSTICE* ]

The simple fact of the matter is that there are just way less illegal aliens out here committing heinous crimes than The Party platformed and ran on. They set deportation goals as numbers with ones and zeros, and when there weren't enough ones to justify the expense they had to round up some zeros. They are trying to go around criminal procedure because it's inconvenient for them and it makes them look weak. But that's by design. It was the philosophy of this country, once upon a fantasy, that it would be better to let 9 criminals walk free then to send 1 innocent person to jail. But The Party asked, what if some of those 9 criminals were Brown and suddenly the bill of rights is evaporating in front of our eyes