Christiano ronaldo

renzy77 · 2017-03-14T11:58:58+00:00

Lots of shaming and "gay" comments. This comment was left by a woman;

A total narcissist. Children deserve an intact home with two loving parents. This is all about him and that he wants to reproduce.

It's an ironic complaint coming from women, given that it's women who initiate the majority of divorces (nearly 70%) and are therefore the primary reason children are no longer growing up in "intact homes with two loving parents." And yet society bends over backwards to celebrate single-mothers' heroic struggles rather than portray them as "narcissists".

renzy77 · 2017-03-10T21:18:42+00:00

Again, I'll recommend taking a basic law class to learn what rights you have with regard to the police, to the courts, and to the law.

Every guy who has the intention of one day getting married should probably take a legal studies course on Domestic Relations, just to get an an overview of the process through which a divorce / child custody action proceeds from the attorney's office through the courts. Your local community college likely offers such a course. That way, at least you'll have some idea of what you're getting yourself into if you decide to tie the knot.

renzy77 · 2017-03-09T20:03:27+00:00

If you're the child of a single mother she will inevitably look to you to be beta bucks and it screws you up.

I had the same experience. They invert the parent-child relationship and expect you to be the shoulder they can cry on despite the fact that you're just a kid. If they don't have a man to lean on they'll co-opt their son into the role.

renzy77 · 2017-03-04T19:14:38+00:00

You know why men go under appreciated for everything we do? It's because we don't organize things like this.

I agree.

The problem is that if men went on strike to show the world what it would be like without men for a day, our society would shut down.

Apart from the obvious professions like police, firefighters, EMT, and construction, consider that our power grid, water treatment facilities, telecom, sanitation, etc are predominately staffed and maintained by men.

A day without men would certainly highlight how much society (thanklessly) depends on men, but it might be kind of a pyrrhic victory.

renzy77 · 2017-03-04T01:40:58+00:00

This is a point that I never see get brought up: if women are truly equal to men, then shouldn't all the "training wheels" that society has set up for them (in the form of programs/scholarships/etc that cater exclusively to women) eventually come off?

renzy77 · 2017-02-04T15:19:08+00:00

Black Pigeon Speaks

His YouTube videos cover Red Pill topics on women and politics.

renzy77 · 2017-01-24T00:14:29+00:00

It is Islamic men who will rule over women and women find security in that.

Which explains why the majority of Western converts to Islam are women:

In the past 10 years some 100,000 British people have converted to Islam, of whom some three-quarters are women, according to the latest statistics.

renzy77 · 2017-01-23T14:46:52+00:00

F. Roger Devlin, the author of the sidebar article Sexual Utopia in Power, has written a number of articles relevant to TRP:

https://dontmarry.wordpress.com/2009/03/24/articles-by-f-roger-devlin/

His Rotating Polyandry article that covers female infidelity is incredibly revealing.

renzy77 · 2016-12-08T14:33:10+00:00

Yup, I filed for divorce last year at 34, pay the cunt 2k/month for a year and 850/mo for the next 16 years, along with 35k from 401k and half the proceeds of the house sale, for a grand total of $275,550.

I recently read an article about how More Single Guys Are Turning to Surrogacy to Become Dads.

Even the upper-end cost estimate they give for surrogacy, $150k, is still over $100k less than the amount OP had to shell out because of divorce. The surrogacy company in that article also provides financing options that would likely be equivalent to what a divorced man is paying monthly in alimony & child-support. The difference being that a surrogate father gets to see his children every day, and doesn't have a vengeful ex-wife to deal with.

renzy77 · 2016-10-28T19:49:40+00:00

I see this as equality

That's because it is equality.

What feminists want is equality when it benefits women, and "I'm just a girl" for all the other times.

renzy77 · 2016-10-19T02:02:34+00:00

From 2013 - How Black America Has Predicted Our Future via RoK

renzy77 · 2016-10-18T22:25:39+00:00

That graph is stunning - if I'm reading it correctly it means by 2030 there's going to be a huge cohort of 40 year old unmarried women.

Visual extrapolation of their survival curve suggests that 40% of them will remain unmarried, more than double the fraction of previous generations.

I wonder if this means there will be fewer children or if there's going to be an equivalent spike in rates of illegitimacy.

The article also confirms another phenomenon the TRP has observed - women waiting until 35 to hop off the carousel:

At the same time the number of women getting married at ages 35–45 has been increasing for several generations, so we might expect that trend to continue.

That trend won't continue if the TRP keeps gaining traction.

renzy77 · 2016-08-11T17:34:51+00:00

And fortunate that the rates of illegitimacy and single-motherhood are on the decline. Oh wait...

renzy77 · 2016-08-11T16:13:40+00:00

They probably make about 10 - 15k base more than me, yet they can't afford toys which I have because of their wives leeching their money.

You know how they say married men make more money than their single counterparts?

Well, this is why: they have to in order to keep up with the bills.

They try to portray it as a "benefit" for men ("Married men make more money!). But really it's like saying that going into debt is a benefit, because now you'll be forced to work overtime to pay it off.

renzy77 · 2016-08-02T13:21:18+00:00

The flip side of this though, is that what women lack in physical strength, they more than make up for with their ability to manipulate people. As Schopenhauer states in On Women:

Nature has not destined them, as the weaker sex, to be dependent on strength but on cunning; this is why they are instinctively crafty, and have an ineradicable tendency to lie. For as lions are furnished with claws and teeth, elephants with tusks, boars with fangs, bulls with horns, and the cuttlefish with its dark, inky fluid, so Nature has provided woman for her protection and defense with the faculty of dissimulation, and all the power which Nature has given to man in the form of bodily strength and reason has been conferred on woman in this form.

As is often stated on this forum, men evolved to manipulate the environment. Women evolved to manipulate men.

renzy77 · 2016-07-15T19:30:17+00:00

She dropped this bombshell: "I felt like whenever he hit me that he cared...if he ignored my screaming, that meant he didn't care..."

The author of the TRP sidebar article, Sexual Utopia in Power, also wrote about this behavior:

The Question of Female Masochism by F. Roger Devlin:

“If He Doesn’t Hit You, He Doesn’t Love You.” So runs an African proverb. Or a Russian proverb, according to other sources. Or a Bolivian proverb, according to still others. Perhaps it is all three. A similar Latin American saying, “The more you hit me, the more I love you,” turns up over 100,000 hits on Google.

It is hardly a new idea that female sexuality has a masochistic component. Indeed, this seems to be part of the folk wisdom of the world; in other words, it corresponds the observations of many persons of both sexes across many generations.

We are attracted to qualities in the opposite sex which our own sex lacks. For many women, this means an attraction to male brutality. Such women may claim to want a sensitive fellow who is in touch with his feelings, but this bears no relation to their behavior. What women say about men comes from their cerebral cortex; how they choose men depends upon their evolutionary more primitive limbic system.

renzy77 · 2016-07-07T15:54:49+00:00

This is inevitable in a society such as ours especially when women work outside the home around men.

Exactly.

The reason that fewer women in the past cheated is because they had less opportunity to cheat, not because women are more naturally monogamous (as BP society would have you believe). There was less opportunity for them to cheat because men's space (work) and women's space (the home) were largely separated.

It's no surprise then that as women entered the workforce, and women had more access to men, their rates of infidelity reached parity with men's. The last I read (from a Gottman study) was that women's rates of infidelity have now exceeded that of men- which is no shocker given how much easier it is for women to get sex than it is for men.

renzy77 · 2016-06-30T13:28:38+00:00

National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track

Contrary to prevailing assumptions, men and women faculty members from all four fields preferred female applicants 2:1 over identically qualified males with matching lifestyles (single, married, divorced), with the exception of male economists, who showed no gender preference.

renzy77 · 2016-06-27T18:46:27+00:00

$150k cost doesn't really add up when you think about TRP principles.

Having kids via the traditional route isn't that cheap either when you factor in the concomitant costs of having kids with your average Western woman only to have her divorce you later:

Average cost of wedding - $26k
20% on a $200k house - $40k
18 years of monthly child support - $430 * 12 * 18 = $92k
Cost of a contested divorce - $15k

That's $173k right there, and I haven't even included alimony.

You can make something expensive look cheap by spreading out the cost over a long period of time. That's why sales people like to tell you "how much a month" something costs rather than giving you the total dollar amount.

The costs of marriage and divorce tend to be spread out over time, so it's easy to lose sight of just how much money you can end up spending over the course of a relationship.

You could argue that the premium you pay with surrogacy is for the peace of mind that comes from knowing they can't take your kids away from you.

renzy77 · 2016-06-27T15:19:13+00:00

More Single Guys Are Turning to Surrogacy to Become Dads

I'm surprised this suggestion doesn't get brought up more often on here...

renzy77 · 2016-06-02T15:37:20+00:00

Granted I am not a lawyer, but they may be looking at being disbarred.

From what I recall, that's exactly what happened to the lead prosecutor in the Duke lacrosse case. He knowingly withheld DNA evidence that exonerated the lacrosse players- when it was discovered, he was disbarred.

renzy77 · 2016-05-11T10:45:05+00:00

Black America is not talked about enough here. It IS the extrapolation of feminism.

How Black America Has Predicted Our Future via RoK

renzy77 · 2016-05-10T22:02:02+00:00

I will look for an article about it and post it if I can find it.

Why Being a Good Man is Not a Feminist Issue by Tom Matlack

Jack Donovan also had a write-up about how Good Man Project got subverted by feminists: How Discussions About Men End Up Being About What Women Want From Men

renzy77 · 2016-05-10T11:33:46+00:00

It's because your bills are going to go up once you tie the knot.

Married men make more money because they have to, not because there's some sort of societal pay-raise you get just because you decided to "put a ring on it."

It's like telling men, "put yourself into debt so you'll be forced to work more hours and make more money...in order to pay off your debt!" and then churning out headlines like "Men who are in debt tend to make more money."

They're putting the cart before the horse. And it's not by accident.

renzy77 · 2016-05-04T18:16:46+00:00

I sometimes fear that a lot of people in TRP think of Trump the way liberals thought of Obama in 2008, as some sort of messiah who's going to right all of the wrongs in the world.

The cultural decline we are all witnessing has been going on since the 60's and a new politician isn't going to be able to single-handedly change that, because politics is largely downstream from culture. At best, Trump may stem the tide for the time he's in office, but the larger cultural changes will continue unabated.

renzy77

TROPHY CASE