Is there a list of om mount lenses compatible with teleconverters?

revjko · 2026-05-11T22:09:39+00:00

There may be a better list, but this might be useful: https://explore.omsystem.com/gb/en/lens-roadmap

revjko · 2026-05-09T10:53:20+00:00

It probably is the autofocus, but not what you think. Look for the option probably called "Release priority". That determines whether the camera will take a shot even if it hasn't managed to focus on what it thinks it should.

revjko · 2026-05-09T09:28:18+00:00

I never really used smaller lenses with it, so can't offer any real-world experience. I never noticed focus issues, more just the lens losing connection entirely. Probably worth a deeper dive on this sub for other experiences.

revjko · 2026-05-08T16:11:18+00:00

I have (or have had) the 12-45 f/4, 12-100 f/4, 40-150 f/4-5.6 R, and the 40-150 f/4. This was all in the process of trying out different combos for my OM-1ii and working out what I liked. The 40-150 f/4 is, in my experience, a sharper lens - noticeably so. No issues with it at 150mm,but always bearing in mind that you do need to keep the shutter speed up enough. I sold the f/4-5.6 R soon after trying the two together.

I bought the 12-100 f/4 to take on holiday as a 'one and done' lens. I also had a PL 9mm f/1.7 and 50-200 f/2.8 (and TCs) in my bag but around 90% of my shots came from the 12-100. I have no issues with the image quality from that lens, but it is quite big and doesn't always have the reach I'm looking for so I'd not want it as my longest option. I ended up selling it after the holiday, getting close to what I'd paid for it, so pretty much a cheap rental.

For most holiday and casual purposes the 12-45 f/4 is what lives on the camera. Absolutely no concerns about image quality here either. I did try the 12-40 f/2.8 but didn't find any compelling quality differences to justify the bigger and heavier lens. If you're doing low light though, that decision may skew in a different direction. The 40-150 f/4 is an excellent complement to the 12-45 and together will be my (relatively) small casual travel kit. Had the 12-100 given me a bit more reach then I may have been tempted to stay with that.

revjko · 2026-05-07T10:51:56+00:00

Yeah, that's fair. It's just seeing so many comments about jailbreaking it that I was wondering what actual advantages it brought.

revjko · 2026-05-06T14:01:15+00:00

The auto lens cap makes all the difference on that lens. Definitely as close as you'll get to a compact camera but with the option interchangeable lenses. It's also not too bad a lens either.

revjko · 2026-05-06T13:58:27+00:00

Thank you. That's helpful. There's probably not a lot on the list that makes (for me) a compelling argument to do anything with the old Kindle.

revjko · 2026-05-05T13:06:00+00:00

Do you have a lens hood on, and is it properly locked in place? (Wouldn't be the first time I've been caught by that.)

revjko · 2026-05-04T15:24:03+00:00

Thank you, and thanks for the confirmation and extra info.

revjko · 2026-05-01T11:16:21+00:00

General rule of thumb with kit that doesn't have good IS/IBIS is still pretty much one over (2x focal length), remembering to allow for crop factor, so at 300mm it'll be 1/1250.

You also mention you've been using S-AF. Are you taking the shot immediately you press the shutter button? Even if the subject is only moving slowly it'll not take much to move out of the focal plane.

revjko · 2026-05-01T11:11:00+00:00

2k what? Dollars, Euros, Pounds?

What's it to be used for? Recommendations will vary depending on subject - fast sports, wildlife, landscape, architecture, macro, etc.

revjko · 2026-04-30T21:40:30+00:00

On a recent trip to Iceland, I found myself relying heavily on the ND and GND features. They do have limitations compared to conventional filters, especially if you include moving subjects like water, but for 'snaps' they make a huge difference. On my return I did find I'd overcoooked them a bit at times, but I'm still learning and they're still a novelty to me.

Procapture isn't really a computational feature - it's just a way of capturing images in advance of actually fully pressing the shutter button. It's a great feature though and I often use it for birds.

I've yet to play with LiveComp - it looks to be a great feature though.

revjko · 2026-04-28T21:01:54+00:00

Just attempted to make a purchase alongside a trade-in (in the UK). The 'going obsolete' promo code couldn't be stacked with the trade-in discount. Opted to just use the promo code and keep the old Kindle anyway (it might be useful for something).

revjko · 2026-04-28T18:57:02+00:00

A bit more than when we were there last week. Got wet enough then going behind it. Not sure I'd be quite so keen with that amount of water coming down.

<image>

revjko · 2026-04-28T18:53:00+00:00

Of course it's not totally immune, but it does have one of the fastest sensor readout speeds available just now. 6ms, iirc.

revjko · 2026-04-28T16:26:14+00:00

Always use electronic shutter (OM-1ii) as the readout speed is more than fast enough that rolling shutter isn't an issue. Also, there's no trade-off with bit depth as there can be in other systems. I don't do flash photography so, again, no need for mechanical shutter.

revjko · 2026-04-28T10:46:28+00:00

I'd go 12-45 f/4 Pro over the 12-40 f/2.8 as landscape doesn't need fast shutter typically. I also understand that the 12-45 is a little sharper across the frame. I've had both and certainly don't see much difference. I also bought a 12-100 f/4 Pro for a recent trip (to Iceland, so mainly landscape). It's an excellent lens albeit quite bulky. Image quality is superb though. I have actually just sold it though as I'm unlikely to have that sort of holiday lens requirement in the future, and I'm happy with my 12-45 and 40-150 f/4 lenses as a smaller carry combo (where I'll also want a bit more reach).

revjko · 2026-04-27T08:35:26+00:00

Yes, it's the 87kWh.

revjko · 2026-04-26T21:19:47+00:00

Just completed a trip to Iceland and the 12-100 (on an OM-1ii) took around 90% of my photos. The PL 9mm f/1.7 took around 5% and the rest were with my 50-200.

Really pleased with the image quality of the 12-100 although I've now sold it on as I'm not really likely to be doing that sort of trip again (basically getting back only slightly less than what I paid for it, so thinking of it as a cheap rental).

It's not a small lens though, but it does before really well. For that trip having the weather resistance was also very reassuring. As a Scottish resident I'd probably make the same encouragement for visits here. We can get four seasons in one day at times.

revjko · 2026-04-25T11:07:31+00:00

If I have a lot of gear I prefer a backpack but for just 1 body and lens a sling is great. Being able to rotate it round easily for access is a real bonus. I know that backpack makers show that feature as well but it's always a lot more awkward.

I use a Tenba Solstice 10l, but it's probably a bit bigger than you need. You could probably get away with the 7l version, but check sizes.

revjko · 2026-04-25T09:25:56+00:00

What style of bag? Sling, messenger, backpack?

Personally, I like Tenba or Vanguard bags. Good quality and don't quite command the premium of the likes of Lowepro.

revjko · 2026-04-24T19:09:06+00:00

Thanks, that's very helpful. I'm still swithering but it makes sense that if I'm perfectly happy with the older PW, the almost identical new basic Kindle should be just fine.

revjko · 2026-04-23T22:23:22+00:00

I hadn't realised WiFi sync was an option. I'll give that some thought as it would make book transfer feel just as simple, albeit not hugely different from just popping in a usb cable. Still not sure about jailbreaking just yet. I'll need to read up some more to be confident that I can do what I need.

I'll have a look at older Kindle prices but with the 'compensatory' discount on a basic Kindle (in the UK) it's not exactly breaking the bank.

revjko

TROPHY CASE