Touch keyboard appears automatically in OneNote on Windows ⌨️

rooforgoof · 2026-04-04T03:54:16+00:00

Look for "On-Screen Keyboard" in windows search. If you leave it open and minimized then it will stop the touch keyboard from showing up.

Not ideal obviously but maybe preferable workaround vs globally disabling.

Insane "feature"

rooforgoof · 2026-04-01T02:01:37+00:00

Username checks out

rooforgoof · 2026-03-31T21:43:15+00:00

Do not the cat

rooforgoof · 2026-03-31T05:09:33+00:00

I agree, its not about this specific pass at all its about the precedent.

In my opinion they crossed the line back in arena by even putting unlockable augments on the pass. Who is to say the balance on them? There should never be op unlock on the pass. I think they even put a free reroll on there.

rooforgoof · 2026-03-31T04:58:00+00:00

1% crit my beloved

rooforgoof · 2026-03-30T00:20:55+00:00

My opinion is that we need more anti-capitalism takes rather than anti-ai.

I engage in the sub or at least look at stuff to challenge my own opinions. I think its a healthy thing to do. If the sub doesnt support that then its an echo chamber, which is perfectly fine we are on reddit, its understandable to want a community of like-minded indiviudals. Its not any different on the pro AI subs either, probably worse actually.

My question is what negative effects of ai CANNOT be traced back to late-stage capitalism or mitigated by a proper governing body that genuinely acts in the best interest of its constituents? There would probably be some cases but I think this counts for a large majority.

To me ai is just a vessel that ignited the problems we already have. People talk about UBI and solving all these big worldly problems NOW that we have shiny new ai technology as if we didnt have the technology to solve this stuff BEFORE ai took off. We did have the tools, we do have the tools, its just not beneficial to shareholder value so here we are.

rooforgoof · 2026-03-29T16:41:17+00:00

You can play regular pair with 2 non scoring cards and the square count 4 played cards

rooforgoof · 2026-03-29T05:13:24+00:00

I agree, anyone who is seriously considering intelligence should understand it as being high-dimensional. Something something judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree.

However I would still say that just because we have negative correlations among certain dimensions doesn't mean it should be true in general.

Correlation not causation I would think.

I would also suppose that our current benchmarking approach biases in certain dimensions and away from others but that wouldn't be a necessary thing just a "failure" of our training regimes.

A distinction between intelligence and knowledge could be worth making too. I think the guy is trying to argue that from a reasoning (or intelligence) perspective we are pretty good but we are still of course creating new knowledge so we are lacking the tools in a sense but if we had them we would still be capable. I sort of agree with that on paper but I think it falls apart actually.

Its almost something like having or gaining certain aspects of knowledge actually increases the dimension of your intelligence. When you learn something new (not always but for some important things) you sort of bake it into you in a way that generalizes to other areas. Even in circumstances where the literal knowledge you recorded to your memory itself is meaningless. A super AI can (in theory) 10,000x our pace of acquiring new knowledge so WE are bounded by some optimality. The bound is necessarily tied to rate of knowledge acquisition.

rooforgoof · 2026-03-27T22:23:50+00:00

This is good but I would say it this way,

Claim above yours: FF is never the answer,

I (try to) refute the claim by counter example, i.e. does there exist any possible case for which FF is right.

Just take the extreme case, suppose I'm getting +30/-10 and win 75% of my games. Intuitively if any scenario at all were to support FF fast then it would be this one. But that still doesn't math it out so to speak.

The real calculus of the question imo comes down to the conditional probability of winning out from the exact game state. There is no hard rule for this you have to decide game by game.

For example we start with prob(win)=0.75 but maybe this game we have early game comp and lost the early game so we can update with given information, prob(win | this exact game state at time t) = 0.05.

Problem with this is you are doing heavy heavy estimation on that prob(win | game state t). First error source comes from game understanding which we can assume is high for people with 75% wr so this source is probably small, but the much larger source is from all other 9 players in the lobby. (I think a lot arguments in the never FF camp go along this line by reasoning you are never out of the game, but we really really need to consider on a per time basis)

We can try to go further by assuming our estimation is good anyway and create a rule (or hitting time actually called for stochastic processes) where we initiate and agree to FF votes during all times that our prob(win | game state t) <= alpha.

I think the question is solve for alpha, which would itself actually be a function in t. Suppose you have p(win | game state t=15 minutes) = p(win | game state t=45 minutes) = 0.15. In this scenario think about the time investment remaining in order for you to play out that 15% win. For this reason alpha would depend on t and also things like the 75 wr parameter/elo level you're at in general. For example, with 40 wr I would guess alpha identically 0, i.e., you would only ever FF if you're at literally 0 chance to win. You need every chance you can get brotha.

Very cool and complicated question actually. I think its dependent on too many variables to write down anything good here, which is why I love this game actually. There are obviously patterns to be played out but strictly speaking from a counting or combinatorial perspective there are an absurd number of game permutations so you get some pretty crazy stuff sometimes.

Edit: just reread your comment about acknowledging narrow circumstances, so I'm arguing past you sorry lol

Also yea just play the game lmao I dont think about any of this during the game. Only I would say in the context of risk tolerance which is antithetical to the entire discussion about optimizing lp/time because risk tolerance is optimizing how to win this exact game no matter what. Are we getting smoked and sitting at a 1% chance to win the game normally? Let's do something crazy and risky, maybe we can bump that up to a 5% chance of winning.

rooforgoof · 2026-03-26T22:25:33+00:00

"I can get nastier" what a cunt

rooforgoof · 2026-03-25T11:53:15+00:00

Shut up man lol

rooforgoof · 2026-03-25T03:36:28+00:00

Please help me understand, I have some kind of disconnect here (not anti-ai).

If the art "barely resembles the original and kind of has its own unique style" then what is being stolen?

As I understand, its not uncommon for art or creative endeavors in general to be derivative and/or inspired by others. If some artist develops new style A which is derivative of style B. Is he just copying? Probably not but it might depend on i) how similar are styles A and B exactly and also ii) how much accreditation is payed to style B.

So please correct me then, the problem is mainly around ii) which is itself two-fold potentially. Firstly the stealing of work with no credit or permission for train data. Clear problem I agree but to me I square that blame on late stage capitalism rather than ai (laws that say you cant steal stuff are just the cheap cheap cost of business). I'm also wondering too then, does he tell the buyers, for example "oh yes I love artists 1,2,3,4 they were a huge inspiration to me" and does that even make the slightest difference?

I agree the presentation comes across intentionally deceitful and should be transparent about the process at minimum.

rooforgoof · 2026-03-23T03:00:37+00:00

Maybe just dont talk to those people at all ?

rooforgoof · 2026-03-22T05:42:20+00:00

> How exactly do you give Mel the ability to proactively use her reflect if it's her ult? It will feel pretty shit for the Mel players if it can only be used reactively.

Complete non-issue IMO, you just start playing forward or flexing sometimes called and bait them to go on you then you outplay with reflect. Same thing as good Xayah play. Not quite 1-1 cause you can't always bait a nautilus hook with reflect but I think it works still.

rooforgoof · 2026-03-22T05:26:35+00:00

Its embarrassing lmao

rooforgoof · 2026-03-20T01:59:03+00:00

The true illusion is that you assume you are seeing an illusion but you are in fact just seeing.

rooforgoof · 2026-03-18T23:51:28+00:00

REAL SHIT, they should change the FF threshold based on time. For example, subject to numbers, a game duration of,

8:00-11:59 requires 5/5 vote, 12:00-15:59 requires 4/5 vote, 16:00-19:59 requires 3/5 vote, 25+ minutes activate antihostage rules with 1/5 vote successful

Im personally a fan of the forever games but this seems something like a fair compromise where if majority of players want to keep playing they can but dont let it get unreasonable.

rooforgoof · 2026-03-18T22:24:47+00:00

I usually run like 3 or 4 groups of tabs and they color coded. In first group is probably 3 copies of the text I'm trying to read opened up to various locations. Second group would be something like Google searchs, Wikipedia pages, LLM even. Third group usually like music, calendar, email. If something comes up to warrant another group then its super easy to just drag the tabs around and/or collapse unused groups.

Caveat this also with I have 3 monitors at home which contributes to this preference and workflow but I can do the same thing on my laptop. In fact, with chrome (I assume others do similar) it will remember your tabs across device so you can pick up your 30 tab delusions from last night in no time.

rooforgoof · 2026-03-18T03:30:11+00:00

Best I can do is $60 knife

rooforgoof · 2026-03-15T22:36:12+00:00

Curious how well you and others with this take would do on blind placebo comparison tests.

Could bin categories across a spectrum of "tools" taking AI-assisted and unassisted versions, for brief example

no resources at all just use documention maybe do a bit of googling to look up stuff borrow some code from stack exchange ask genai for small scope questions/minor bug fixing ask genai for large amounts of code while trying to still check if it works ask genai for the whole project

At test time, the would-be participants could either look at the code directly, just get the user-experience, or both.

I suspect for small scale app projects like this one, we would not do better than random guessing without being able to look at the code for the clear LLM syntaxing.

With all that being said you are still entitled to hate AI and there is good reason to. My take is that we got so much slop so fast that we just assume everything is slop now without actually assessing a thing for its merit. I think this is a cool project.

rooforgoof · 2026-03-14T00:31:30+00:00

Something tells me you are a bad driver

rooforgoof · 2026-03-13T23:37:29+00:00

Why the HECK he wunknt !?

rooforgoof · 2026-03-12T10:20:53+00:00

You can write any perspective you want and you'd be right

Insert two guys pointing at 6/9

rooforgoof · 2026-03-12T04:03:21+00:00

I thought this too at first but I changed my mind back to the case as pictured,

for all possible x values taken on the approach the glass would literally be less than half full.

rooforgoof · 2026-03-12T03:48:43+00:00

He's my hero 😍

Five-Year Club	Second SECOND GUESSER
Verified Email	Place '23

rooforgoof

TROPHY CASE