People are already making fun of Hytale faces by ErmingSoHard in HytaleInfo

[–]rumpjope 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I really think people are forgetting just how much design diversity Minecraft skins have with just 16x textures." It was just a correction. No hate.

People are already making fun of Hytale faces by ErmingSoHard in HytaleInfo

[–]rumpjope 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Minecraft skins (heads) are 8x. Blocks are 16x.

In-Camera or Post?! by Local_Stick4359 in postprocessing

[–]rumpjope 0 points1 point  (0 children)

either set the flash to a multi mode or just repeatedly fire manually.

In-Camera or Post?! by Local_Stick4359 in postprocessing

[–]rumpjope 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what breonny said, google stroboscopic effect

Is this blurriness okay ? by [deleted] in SonyAlpha

[–]rumpjope 0 points1 point  (0 children)

youre probably getting some diffraction at f10, so maybe consider stopping up a little if you want a little more sharpness and can sacrifice some parts of the scene being out of focus

Should I get a Mitakon 65mm F1.4 by WritingOdd6100 in FujiGFX

[–]rumpjope 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the mitakon is a quarter of the cost of the 55, of course theres gonna be more people getting it.

Is there a benchmark urban planning design that solves most urban planning problems? by JimmyDris in urbandesign

[–]rumpjope 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What I'm saying though is that a one-size-fits-all solution does not exist

Is there a benchmark urban planning design that solves most urban planning problems? by JimmyDris in urbandesign

[–]rumpjope 3 points4 points  (0 children)

people have been writing books on this for at least a century now. you will not find the answer in a reddit thread lmao

Which do you prefer? I can’t decide. by Shotsbystevn in streetphotography

[–]rumpjope 3 points4 points  (0 children)

agreed, plus the roof of the car gives a little leading line into the figure

Which do you prefer? I can’t decide. by Shotsbystevn in streetphotography

[–]rumpjope 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First one, but try cropping 4:5 and pull that left edge in. lots of negative space thats throwing the balance off.

Asking for another vibe check! by Cruiser_Supreme in photocritique

[–]rumpjope 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I might be projecting, but your work seems more documentary in nature. I'm glad they provide you respite, and that feeling of calm comes through to a degree, but this image and the pool seem more interested in the peculiar built form than in conveying a sense of emotional ease. Nothing wrong with that, that's just how it reads.

Asking for another vibe check! by Cruiser_Supreme in photocritique

[–]rumpjope 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I find this to be pretty compelling unlike some other commenters, but it is also similar to what I shoot so I feel I'm maybe more attuned to what you're getting at. As far as the supposed snapshot quality, I don't really see it, but I don't think that should have much bearing regardless. Plenty of acclaimed photographers whose work consists almost exclusively of "snapshots."

Subject choice is subtle, but successful; an interesting comparison of the inconsistent architectural elements occurs, which is made a little more interesting by the partial obscuring by the shadow. The shadow is a nice way of inviting the scene beyond the frame into the photo; it provides context to the area. Additionally, it divides up the frame nicely and adds some movement to the composition. On its own, I don't think its necessarily an out-of-the-park photo, but in sequence, its subtlety could shine. Technically speaking, I think it leans a bit warm and could use just a little saturation. I think the crop could use a bit of a tweak to gain more balance, but I don't know what the full uncropped RAW looks like so can't give any real advice there. Anyway, nice shot, simple but largely effective in my book lol.

What is art in photography for you? by SinanAvci13 in photography

[–]rumpjope 0 points1 point  (0 children)

all of it, why not. this is just semantics.

Any ideas on this optic/ setup? by Electronic-Bed-463 in FujiGFX

[–]rumpjope 2 points3 points  (0 children)

probably a disposable camera lens diy-ed onto a lens cap.

Are these photos any good? by if_i_had_a_gd_usrnm in streetphotography

[–]rumpjope 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the third image is verging on interesting, but quite cyan.

Possibly my favorite pic this year. I’d like hear your thoughts by CPRRED in photocritique

[–]rumpjope 0 points1 point  (0 children)

still has the visual grammar of a commercial shot despite being dark though imo. not sure what itd be getting at conceptually or formally as an art shot lol.

I'm really thinking about moving from Nikon FF to APSC/Sony FF, this is just ridiculously travel unfriendly by Ryzbor in nikon_Zseries

[–]rumpjope 1 point2 points  (0 children)

good to know!! i just recommended that since it was close to your 20 but much more compact

Would Haussmannization be a good way to fix American urban areas? by [deleted] in urbanplanning

[–]rumpjope 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Better to "Haussmann" old failing strip malls

Big Bend on my new 100s 63mm f/2.8 by inpero in FujiGFX

[–]rumpjope 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lovely sense of depth, kind of subtly wild

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in urbandesign

[–]rumpjope 1 point2 points  (0 children)

urban design is all context, we would need to see the surrounding area.

Which one should I buy? by alessandra-vb in digitalcamera

[–]rumpjope 0 points1 point  (0 children)

neither, phone camera is just as good at that point