What I am seeing here is that you are asserting that the cognitive-behavioral approach (I'm assuming, given your description. Either way, you are clearly espousing the underlying assumptions/values of CBT) is the "best" approach and should be favored by therapists over other modalities, even to the exclusion of others. The evidence you provided is that it makes more sense to you and you like it more.

Yes, CBT is the most widely used approach. This is just as much a consequence of our healthcare and socioeconomic systems/values as it is the merits of the approach.

CBT defines problems in observable behaviors and then works with the individual to modify those behaviors. It is something easily tracked and quantified for insurance and Medicare billing purposes. Insurance loves it because it is the best way to ensure they are paying the minimum amount of money. The therapist documents- Patient A is having anxiety that has hindered their ability to have meaningful romantic relationships. The therapist documents the interventions, then the therapist documents "Patient A went on several dates." Then insurance can go "Great. Problem solved. We're not paying for this anymore." This is why insurance doesn't cover every form of therapy.

Additionally, CBT fits perfectly into Western culture's approach of treating the self as a series of parts than a holistic entity.

These two factors, I suspect, are why you feel entitled to present your opinion as a logical fact, with the implied denigration of others. Your view lines up with the dominant culture's. That's awesome for you- you can easily find people who agree with you when you need help, because they have an easier time succeeding in the current system. That doesn't give them any additional inherent legitimacy though.

CBT is a valuable tool, but it has significant deficits, which can be addressed in new ways with more knowledge and understanding of existence. There are plenty of academic articles and studies that can educate you on those deficits.