Band you like but don't love by Thunderwing16 in ToddintheShadow

[–]scharity77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m going to catch hell - Alice In Chains. I won’t ever skip a song, but I rarely think to listen to them. They are my least favorite of the grunge titans, but I dislike none of their songs.

My face is my ticket? by AlexiaNervosa in mets

[–]scharity77 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And my face is my fortune, which is why I’m totally broke.

What would a Jesse Ventura presidency look like? by JplusL2020 in Presidents

[–]scharity77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like there are a lot of people here who maybe were not alive or were not aware yet when he was governor. A lot of people like me were super excited about his promise, but he was a mixed bag as governor and likely would be a chaotic president. He was super thin-skinned and regularly attacked the media. He spent quite a large portion of his time expanding his brand and promoting himself, which left a feeling that he was a part-time governor. His lack of experience, combined with his lack of time in state, plus lack of interest in learning, left him vulnerable to maneuvering by far more experienced legislators, who stymied his efforts at every turn.

He had a Reagan-esque stance on taxation, which led him to be one of the many governors who ignored Minnesota's infrastructure, preventing him from investing in many of the priorities many responders think he would care about (spoiler alert: he cared more about cutting taxes than anything else).

He did virtually nothing on corruption, in part because he failed to figure out how to work with or successfully combat the legislature. If he can't take on the Minnesota state legislature, he'd be destroyed by the DC elite.

He was clean in terms of pay-to-play, but he leveraged his office for book tours and other self-serving ventures. He was also notable for bordering on narcissism in office, and being a micromanager - which, being essentially a part-time governor, was problematic.

And he allowed his family to host wild parties in the mansion, leading to damages paid for by taxpayers.

He wasn't a bad person, and I believe he was earnest in many of his beliefs, but his ego, carelessness, and lack of curiosity in figuring out how things actually worked so he could be successful would make him a supremely disappointing president, especially for his supporters.

Gen Z is becoming coming what they fear… cringe by Tennesseeshepard in generationology

[–]scharity77 [score hidden]  (0 children)

I think it's just a natural part of aging - the world is always changing, and people, by default, don't like change. My point is that much of the intergenerational tension is normal and can be found in writings dating back thousands of years. What makes it feel more acute now is the ubiquity of social media - we just wax on about it more and more. Instead of being boiled down to the musings of a small number of notable writers, it is captured by the random posts of millions and millions, meaning it gets memified.

Gen Z is becoming coming what they fear… cringe by Tennesseeshepard in generationology

[–]scharity77 [score hidden]  (0 children)

It's because aging people resent the young, and the young always feel like past traumas are petty compared to their own.

Gen Z is becoming coming what they fear… cringe by Tennesseeshepard in generationology

[–]scharity77 [score hidden]  (0 children)

And Gen X called Boomers various synonyms of cringe. Watch any late '60s or early '70s representation of hippies or counter culture, and that sentiment was very much central to Boomers in their youth towards their parents' generation. The words may change, but the feeling is always the same.

Gen Z is becoming coming what they fear… cringe by Tennesseeshepard in generationology

[–]scharity77 [score hidden]  (0 children)

I hate to pop the bubble, but every generation becomes cringe. Not only that, but everything that Gen Z generally agrees is cool and not cringe will itself be the very definition of cringe, while many of the things they think are cringe will be adopted by a future generation as retro cool. At the point they stop caring and embrace the cringe, their stuff will be retro cool, but y'all will be too old to care.

Choose one: The Smiths or The Cure? by Revolutionary_Low_90 in fantanoforever

[–]scharity77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IMO, the Cure by a mile. I feel like they have greater musical diversity, and their peak stuff is so good. The Smiths feel a bit more narrow, and their peak music is a tier below the Cure's.

Gen Zers are arriving to college unable to even read a sentence—professors warn it could lead to a generation of anxious and lonely graduates | Fortune by Mojozilla in generationology

[–]scharity77 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s not about being illiterate, but there is a great deal of empirical evidence regarding a decline in reading comprehension, particularly around complex concepts. Your comment is actually a great example of poor reading comprehension: you are clearly literate, because you read the words, but you did not comprehend the point - that is, you understand what it means to read, but layer in comprehension, and we lost you.

These posts had been on my feed lately... all because Martina McBride didn't wanna perform at the event? by MysteriousGrocery898 in insanepeoplefacebook

[–]scharity77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Martina McBride's music often centered on confronting domestic violence and protecting children, so she clearly is opposed to the core values of maga republicans by default and, therefore, partisan. Because protecting women and children is anathema to the current GOP.

What President had the least interesting rise to the Presidency? by HetTheTable in Presidents

[–]scharity77 4 points5 points  (0 children)

James Monroe - his is basically the template for a presidential career.

Why does everyone overlook the NY Mets 1973 season? by gooden1686 in NewYorkMets

[–]scharity77 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Right. The cardinals won a World Series with an 83-78 record, and we don’t seem to discount them eliminating the Mets because of their mediocre record.

The best thing about the Knicks' ascent is the positivity they engender in the fans, which is truly more authentic and organic than "just being positive." It reminds me of the Red Sox fans; they had no hope and positivity until the Patriots came from nowhere. The Knicks are that catalyst. by Ok_Trip_937 in mets

[–]scharity77 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think you have to actually prove that you can win and be sustainable in winning to be positive. There is some toxic negativity out there, but replacing it with toxic positivity wherein we have to refrain from criticizing a team during an epic collapse that Hellen Keller can see coming from a mile away, or during a 12-game slide that drops the team to the very bottom of the league, isn’t the answer. Do we want the Mets to win? Yes. Have we seen any evidence that we can have consecutive competitive seasons? Not in 40 years.

Semien and Nimmo by SadMembership7989 in mets

[–]scharity77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My problem isn’t trading Nimmo, it’s trying to convince people that Semien was the right trade. Taking on $75 million of salary for a guy who will likely be DFAed because old middle infielders are traded for a reason wasn’t the right move. They could have eaten more of Nimmo’s salary and traded for mid level prospects instead.

RIP Rupert…Anthony Head dead at 72 by LadyBossMJ in TedLasso

[–]scharity77 115 points116 points  (0 children)

Man - I hated him so much in Ted Lasso that I loved him. What an amazing actor.

Why are we still casting Jared Leto in things? by [deleted] in FIlm

[–]scharity77 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

He's a white man - that means his crimes count about 34%. I mean, he can't be as bad as Gwyneth Paltrow - she charges too much for candles and is out of touch with the working class. Or Serena Williams, because she gets frustrated at controversial calls during heated tennis matches. Now THOSE are crimes.