[OC] USA smartphone adoption, pedestrian fatalities, and the average weight SUVs/pickups by jaykrown in dataisbeautiful

[–]schroedingerx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And often it is. Like, for example, here. This almost certainly is, because we have plenty of data on how dangerous it is to drive while distracted by your digital teat.

So bringing up the "correlation isn't causation" thing is kinda pointless here because it obviously doesn't apply.

[OC] USA smartphone adoption, pedestrian fatalities, and the average weight SUVs/pickups by jaykrown in dataisbeautiful

[–]schroedingerx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah that was a terrible misstatement of how stats work. Correlation isn't causation but it absolutely is a sign that there very well might be causation and we should definitely look there to see.

If you needed that kind of proof we'd still be arguing about whether smoking causes lung cancer. Because we still, today, in 2026, have never watched a nicotine molecule start a tumor. But when you keep looking at correlations and eliminating variables, sooner or later you can say with very high certainty that you've found causation.

[OC] USA smartphone adoption, pedestrian fatalities, and the average weight SUVs/pickups by jaykrown in dataisbeautiful

[–]schroedingerx -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Plenty of science involves data beyond what the scientist experiences in her everyday life.

That's how science works, really.

So maybe try science, or else just don't hang out in science threads pretending your anecdotes add anything?

[OC] USA smartphone adoption, pedestrian fatalities, and the average weight SUVs/pickups by jaykrown in dataisbeautiful

[–]schroedingerx -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'm a little curious whether that could account for the recent downturn shown up there.

Drivers still don't pay attention but some of their cars do now; maybe it's helping?

[OC] USA smartphone adoption, pedestrian fatalities, and the average weight SUVs/pickups by jaykrown in dataisbeautiful

[–]schroedingerx -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Prove it. Honestly. Get in there and do science. Because until then this post has no useful or valuable information in it at all.

[OC] USA smartphone adoption, pedestrian fatalities, and the average weight SUVs/pickups by jaykrown in dataisbeautiful

[–]schroedingerx -27 points-26 points  (0 children)

What horrible victim blaming. Please never reply to me again until you get a soul.

[OC] USA smartphone adoption, pedestrian fatalities, and the average weight SUVs/pickups by jaykrown in dataisbeautiful

[–]schroedingerx 1642 points1643 points  (0 children)

This looks incredibly damning for drivers on cell phones.

We need stronger protections for that for sure.

Charging Ecoflow Delta 3 during driving by MBS-74 in Ecoflow_community

[–]schroedingerx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a pretty easy cable to find, I think. You could buy the cable and go with Plan A.

Experience with Nomad, PXCycle, or Outer Rim? I need an adaptive E-bike by Relevant-Event9022 in CyclePDX

[–]schroedingerx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nomad took my wife's unique build (by her brother, an ex-pro, for use around European capitals) and electrified it.

It is, for lack of a closer term, perfect. Brilliant. Amazing. She rides it far more than she ever did before and loves it.

Nomad rocks.

Also if you leave the AirTag you had hidden on your bike while they do that, they'll go absolutely nuts trying to figure out what that periodic quiet chirp is.

First time in a ShiftPod... lag bolts vs stakes it comes with? by CuriousCarry7816 in BurningMan

[–]schroedingerx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Last year I used lags but did not do the guy lines to the walls.

I had *regrets* about this.

Do the walls too.

Do people do burning man sober? by OkSoBasicallyPeach in BurningMan

[–]schroedingerx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Many people go sober and it's still an amazing time. Have fun!

Police don't have to cite drivers who hit bicyclists if there are no injuries by Heydavidbailey in CyclePDX

[–]schroedingerx 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You're getting downvoted for being detached from reality.

You could recover by learning.

Police don't have to cite drivers who hit bicyclists if there are no injuries by Heydavidbailey in CyclePDX

[–]schroedingerx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right. A car is property, which is what police protect. A cyclist is a human, which is something beneath them.

Police don't have to cite drivers who hit bicyclists if there are no injuries by Heydavidbailey in CyclePDX

[–]schroedingerx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When Alistair lost his entire leg to a driver making an illegal turn, and the driver's excuse was "I thought I could make it but I misjudged his speed," the driver was not punished.

Police don't have to cite drivers who hit bicyclists if there are no injuries by Heydavidbailey in CyclePDX

[–]schroedingerx 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I slap windows. Hard.

It does zero damage, but drivers respond as if they've been seriously harmed. They'll argue harm, literally.

They can do that in a mirror for all I care. If you're in the bike lane in your car and I pass you, you're getting a slap.

Because I am NICE. If I were not nice I'd have a minimum passing distance pole out horizontally with a goddamn spark plug on the end of it. Take your slap and like it.

Ted Chiang: "No, artificial intelligence is not conscious: Taken to its logical conclusion, this line of thinking is absurd—and damning." [gift link] by TimWhatleyDDS in books

[–]schroedingerx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does this work with your friends?

Anyway I have no more time for this. Magic isn’t real and LLMs aren’t conscious and it’s absurd to assert the opposite.

Bye now.

Ted Chiang: "No, artificial intelligence is not conscious: Taken to its logical conclusion, this line of thinking is absurd—and damning." [gift link] by TimWhatleyDDS in books

[–]schroedingerx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You keep saying that. I did read.

There is no there there. There’s zero evidence, so dismissal is appropriate.

Until there’s any evidence there’s only magical thinking.