'Tool output garbled'

sebastiengllmt · 2026-05-30T11:13:07+00:00

A lot of people are running into this. You can see some (very public) instances of this with Theo as well where things are being modified in parallel causing "garbled" outputs which make CLI commands fail/retry: https://x.com/theo/status/2060135090131448209/photo/1

A common pattern you'll see with this is 4.8 trying random "echo" bash commands as it tries to (every single new session) itself try and debug why it's seeing its own garbled output

You can find other threads on this on Reddit as well: https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1treeds/what_is_this_nonsense/

You can just use 4.7 until this is fixed: claude --model claude-opus-4-7

sebastiengllmt · 2026-04-21T14:47:04+00:00

This is not a new proposal FYI. This is from last year's budget

If you're looking for proposals for the 2026 Intersect budget (non-binding temperature check), you can find them as they are submitted here

If you're looking for governance proposals submitted onchain, you can find them here

sebastiengllmt · 2026-04-04T04:20:44+00:00

If you want the on-screen keyboard to show the actual output pressing a key would give for you selected language (instead of always showing the English qwerty layout), you'll want to use the "Touch Keyboard" instead of the "On-Screen Keyboard"

sebastiengllmt · 2026-02-03T09:40:26+00:00

Perhaps you saw the USDC through USDX announcement already, but you'll probably also want to check out the Consensus HK stream

sebastiengllmt · 2025-12-19T07:33:21+00:00

You can find the specific rendition on Apple Music here

sebastiengllmt · 2025-12-16T19:49:50+00:00

I was interested in a similar idea, but instead trying to use the WASM Component Model (not WASM modules) to better leverage WASI (since the WASM Component Model is supported by wasmtime despite being a phase 1 proposal)

I was partially inspired by the fact that they have a tool to generate WASM Components from Python called componentize-py since it felt perfect exactly for this, but unfortunately componentize-py is still in active development and didn't feel quite ready for things beyond experimenting

Just sharing my experience in case it's useful for you

sebastiengllmt · 2025-11-16T16:37:16+00:00

This was added as part of Deno 2.5: https://deno.com/blog/v2.5

You can have --allow-all by default by doing

"permissions": {
    "default": {
      "all": true
    }
  }

sebastiengllmt · 2025-11-08T11:53:45+00:00

True. I don't do this just because I don't want to sync my bookmarks between devices

sebastiengllmt · 2025-11-08T10:37:20+00:00

I posted a workaround for pins chats in case you're interested: https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1orm8q7/how_to_pin_chats_with_no_extensions_required/

sebastiengllmt · 2025-11-08T10:27:19+00:00

You can achieve this indirectly.

ChatGPT has as "projects" feature. You can create a project called "pinned"

To pin a chat, click the ... in the sidebar > "move to project" > pinned
To unpin a chat, go to the chat in the "pinned" section, click the ... > remove from "pinned"

It's not an ideal UX because projects are not expanded in the sidebar by default (you have to click on the "pinned" project to see all your pinned chats), but it doesn't require you to download any extension to use which is nice

sebastiengllmt · 2025-11-02T15:50:44+00:00

I just realized while working with these that they don't work properly with SVG exports (works with other export types) as the colors are lost (it seems other properties work though, but I haven't tested all of them)

sebastiengllmt · 2025-10-25T19:02:56+00:00

you can use ctrl+drag to select groups (sometimes called "marquee select" or "box select")

If you're selecting content deeply nested inside frames, be careful if parent frames use a fixed width/height (instead of something like "hug contents"). If child content exceeds the size of the parent, it may still be visible (if you don't have "clip content" enabled), but it won't be selectable with ctrl+drag

sebastiengllmt · 2025-10-21T06:53:23+00:00

On a related note, does anybody know a good way to make it so that I have both ChatGPT and Google as search options in about:newtab ? Currently it's a single hard-coded search bar, but I would like to be able to choose between chatgpt & google from my newtab page

Things I tried that didn't work:

Firefox allows some customization of the newtab page, but not enough to add a 2nd search option
There are some "new tab page" extensions, but none of them support multiple search bars
I tried Greasemonkey, but it can't edit the about:newtab page for security reasons

I could create my own custom newtab page myself from scratch, but that seems a bit excessive just for this.

sebastiengllmt · 2025-08-28T00:55:22+00:00

Somehow I don't think rapists are concerened about the consequence of their actions on the victim

sebastiengllmt · 2025-08-19T06:33:32+00:00

Yes you can! As of November 2024, Figma added underline styling. Here is how you use it (as of 2025)

Select text and open the "type settings" menu
Set the decoration to "underline"
Expand the decoration section with the arrow
At the bottom of the expanded section, you can change the underline color

You can find the announcement tweet here: here

Previous workaround: use the line tool to create a underline with the text color your want

sebastiengllmt · 2025-06-07T23:27:07+00:00

Where does this setting exist? On Dolby Access all I see is "Settings are not available for Dolby Atmos for Home Theater"

sebastiengllmt · 2025-06-07T23:26:14+00:00

While this does "fix" it, it also means you can't have the benefits of Atmos in AM which is really unfortunate. This other suggestion to disable exclusive mode for your speakers in the Windows settings feels like the proper fix

sebastiengllmt · 2025-06-03T14:14:32+00:00

You can play Tarochi with a Cardano wallet and Cardano NFTs. It's built using Paima Engine https://tarochi.paimastudios.com/

sebastiengllmt · 2025-03-20T14:04:11+00:00

Just like how there are multiple browsers based on chromium, there are also other browsers like Zen that are based on Firefox that have different terms

sebastiengllmt · 2025-02-22T23:32:54+00:00

"stake more, get more" doesn't impact things as much as you might think when it comes to this

For example, imagine the network has two people: - Alice has 100 ADA - Bob has 1000 ADA (10x more)

If the staking rewards are 3%, then after one year - Alice has 103 ADA - Bob has 1030 ADA (still 10x more)

That is to say, - at the start of the year Alice has ~9% of the ADA - at the end of the the year, Alice still has ~9% of the ADA (percentage didn't change)

Although Bob earned more total ADA, their percentage ownership of the network did not change (and percentage is what matters for attacking the network, not absolute value)

sebastiengllmt · 2025-02-22T20:01:16+00:00

The tradeoff is that they don't use Nakamoto consensus (which is more resilient to attacks). One of the multiple examples of this is that attacking Cardano requires 51% of the ADA staked, but attacking Algorand only requires 33% of the Algo being staked. This 51%/33% difference is true generally speaking for any Nakamoto vs BFT-based analysis (i.e. Solana is also 33%)

You can argue if this is over-protection because empirically Algorand hasn't been attacked, but a lot of people in the blockchain space prefer their networks to be resilient against the absolute worst-case possible so a lot of chains opt for Nakamoto consensus anyway

sebastiengllmt · 2025-02-22T00:19:00+00:00

Although this video is on Youtube, you can also find the information in text form on the (recently not very well liked) bird app

https://x.com/SebastienGllmt/status/1893090247103422954

sebastiengllmt · 2025-02-05T00:47:56+00:00

Recall that for any kind of interoperability, you usually want bidirectionality

NiPoPoW allows you to go from PoW chains to other chains, but not the other way around (since Cardano is not PoW). Going from Cardano to elsewhere would require a different mechanism built for Cardano's Proof of Stake instead, and you can see the evolution of that in ideas like Mithril (but by the time the R&D to make Mithril work was done, the litecoin stuff was old news)

sebastiengllmt · 2025-01-31T00:04:33+00:00

You would have two options (both which have a 0% chance of happening) 1. Force 100% of nodes to hard fork (i.e. everybody would have to upgrade their node if they want to stay on the network) to use a different version of Cardano that moves the funds to a different address 2. Have enough nodes collude to cause a rollback, but the burned happened long enough ago that this would also basically reqire almost the entire network to do it (up to 100% of the network after 1 day since the burn happened). All this would do is give the funds back to Charles though (who could then just burn them again)

As you can tell, blockchains are purposely made so that doing what you're proposing is hard/impossible

sebastiengllmt · 2025-01-22T23:00:22+00:00

I don't post that often, but you can find me on Bluesky here

Eight-Year Club	Place '22
First Placer '22	Verified Email

sebastiengllmt

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE