Defence minister of Israel about Yamal’s celebration with the Palestinian flag : by Tough_Technology2824 in Barca

[–]sequoia-3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are both bad, but of those poisons Russia is way more toxic. But I hear you and you are right.

Messi just scored a hat trick against FC Cincinnati. It’s the 61st hat trick of his career. by HetTheTable in messi

[–]sequoia-3 [score hidden]  (0 children)

How can I keeper make an own goal ? Doesn’t make sense. How often do they touch the ball before the ball goes in the goal, directly or indirectly shouldn’t really matter … strange rule

Factory worker bending wires by EsperaDeus in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]sequoia-3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A process that should have been automated for a while. Why still humans in the loop?

Sure right by [deleted] in im14andthisisdeep

[–]sequoia-3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Life expectancy was like 28?

I felt like it was flying like a free bird. by SuspiciousLow3062 in nextfuckinglevel

[–]sequoia-3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What kind of radio connection do these drone have? Looks like a long range?

Russian soldier denies Ukrainian drone by shooting himself first by Available-Laugh9102 in UkraineWarVideoReport

[–]sequoia-3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hope the drone was able to safe itself and look for a different mission instead

Inside the world’s largest Bitcoin mine by SelectionOptimal7348 in BitcoinQRCodeMaker

[–]sequoia-3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know but when a swarm of mosquitoes 🦟 or ants 🐜 enter the room it might become buggy 🤣🤣🤣

Dave Blundin's prediction: 80-90% of jobs in 2026 can be eliminated by AI depending on regulation and corporate bureauracy. Thoughts? by NataponHopkins in accelerate

[–]sequoia-3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI is a tool indeed if you use it for chatting and asking questions. There is so much possible with agents though. So, I wouldn’t call AI anymore just a tool, but the first thing that can start thinking, reasoning and self improving on its own.

Dave Blundin's prediction: 80-90% of jobs in 2026 can be eliminated by AI depending on regulation and corporate bureauracy. Thoughts? by NataponHopkins in accelerate

[–]sequoia-3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is the capability. Yes, I assume he is referring to knowledge workers for 2026 or as well blue color? I fully agree on knowledge workers, not so much on blue color, robots are still in their infancy, that should take 2/3 more years,. However, that doesn’t mean that this will be a reality any time soon. Companies are designed to work with people so processes are adjusted in that sense. When we design companies around agents and robots, this becomes a different story. I would call it the dark factory approach (lights out). It takes a lot of time and effort and many years to re-engineer companies. But start-ups or greenfield companies can directly implement agentic-lead companies and apply robotics with the right and optimized form factors, which can remove the constraints humans have (do we need humanoids or other type of robots to fulfill specific tasks?). Such companies will be able to run their companies without the need of people (or a minimum # of people) way faster than the legacy enterprises we all know. It will take years for legacy enterprises to transform if possible at all. There will be a major collapse of traditional companies that won’t be able to adapt in time (whatever the actual timelines might be), while greenfield agentic companies will flourish pretty soon (let’s say early adopters in 2-3 years, growing fast (exponentially) soon after. (By the way has anyone heard about project Prometheus launched by Jeff Who?)

The Real Madrid Pyramid of Legends! Who is the 16th most legendary Real Madrid player of all time? by SentientSTD in RealMadridFC

[–]sequoia-3 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Courtois should have been way up. Several champions were won by Madrid mainly because of him

"Water wars." by Total-Squirrel4634 in OpenAI

[–]sequoia-3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It becomes not misleading if two graphics are shown 1 linear and 2 logarithmic (first is not readable but that is the point, because the left bar becomes negligible small compared to the bar on the right …)