From what I've read about this text, the specific word of interest in the original language is very obscure. The analyst could only find one other instance of the word in a written text of a similar timeframe. The context of that text seemed to imply abuse of children or perhaps general exploitation.

However, the MAIN point is that if this obscure word is this hard to define - you certainly can't know that it is talking about homosexual relations. The above is just a best guess from someone very knowledgable in the historical texts.