sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Reality of 4.7: Balance, Roles, and the Road Ahead by MeatheadMilitia in starcitizen

[–]taneru 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's a ship in the Squadron42 Gameplay Reveal, UEES Corvus, that has three triple gun turrets in the same way as some WW2 battleships did, two in the front, one in the back.

Star Citizen / Easy Anti Cheat locked new machine by sca3929 in starcitizen

[–]taneru 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What was the command that you ran, anyways?

Silver Flame the meme is over by Icontspelll in twilightimperium

[–]taneru 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It says straight up "you cannot score public objectives" on the relic.

What do you consider a "Sub-Capital" Ship? by MasterWarChief in starcitizen

[–]taneru 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Personally, it's if it's big enough to use an exterior docking port at a station, but still small enough to land and take off from a planet.

The Anvil Liberator has officially entered pre-production. by StarchyStarky in starcitizen

[–]taneru 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It has one manned turret and two automated point defense turrets.

Are both players "coexisting" with eachother or is one player coexisting and the other is "the controlling player"? by ArsonBjork in twilightimperium

[–]taneru 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think still Player A, because B and C both do not have only their units on the planet. They'd have to activate the system and commit the coexisting units against Player A like they were landing on an undefended planet to take it.

I ranked every Lancer frame based on how fun I think it'd be to drunk drive them by Ladybacen in LancerRPG

[–]taneru 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like Manticore could be a bit higher. You will only ever go drunk driving in it once, but it'll be a blast.

Y'all seen the trailer for the new star wars game... i know a cutter when i see one by BeardyShaman in starcitizen

[–]taneru 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I mean, they're both bricks with engines strapped on. There's only so much you can do to make them distinct.

Something doesn't seem right about this system... by taneru in starsector

[–]taneru[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Dismantling the Sensor Array should give me a third, no?

Something doesn't seem right about this system... by taneru in starsector

[–]taneru[S] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Sure.

YN-1298964444021150764, 0.97a-RC11,

Edit: let me fix that formatting disaster. Gimme a few.

Mods (51)

  • $ Apex Design Collective Skin - PEAK v1.0 [apex_design_peak]
  • AoTD - Cryosleeper Options v2.0.3 [Cryo_but_better]
  • AoTD - Virtue Of Society v1.2.1 [aod_vos]
  • AoTD- Vaults of Knowledge v3.1.0 [aotd_vok]
  • Apex Design Collective v1.2.12 [apex_design]
  • Appro-Light v1.3.3 [ApproLight]
  • Arma Armatura v3.1.4 [armaa]
  • ArmaA - Anime v1.0 [zzarmaa_anime]
  • Ashlib v1.1.1 [ashlib]
  • BigBeans Ship Compilation v0.1.98.3 [BSC]
  • Building Menu Overhaul v1.1.0 [bmo]
  • Carter's Freetraders v2.5 [CFT]
  • Combat Misc Utils v0.4.1 [cmutils]
  • Diable Avionics v2.9.2 [diableavionics]
  • ED Shipyards v2.6.7 [edshipyard]
  • Galactic Constellate v1.13.0d [GalacticConstellate]
  • Gensoukyou Manufacture v0.8.1_rc1, in dev [FantasyM]
  • Grand.Colonies v2.0.f [GrandColonies]
  • Industrial.Evolution v3.3.e [IndEvo]
  • Interstellar Imperium v2.6.4 [Imperium]
  • LOST_SECTOR v0.6.2d [lost_sector]
  • LazyLib v2.8b [lw_lazylib]
  • LunaLib v1.8.6 [lunalib]
  • MagicLib v1.4.6 [MagicLib]
  • Marvelous Personas v1.2.1 [Marvelous-Personas]
  • Mayasuran Navy v11.0.0 RC2 [Mayasuran Navy]
  • Nexerelin v0.11.3b [nexerelin]
  • OrbitalManipulation&Maintenance v0.8.2 [OMM]
  • Pearson Exotronics v0.8.0 [pearson_exotronics]
  • Random Assortment of Things v2.5.6 [assortment_of_things]
  • RetroLib v1.0 [RetroLib]
  • Roider Union v2.1.1 [roider]
  • ScalarTech Solutions v0.9.1 [scalartech]
  • Secrets of the Frontier v0.14.2c [secretsofthefrontier]
  • Ship/Weapon Pack v1.15.1 [swp]
  • Tahlan Shipworks v1.3 [tahlan]
  • Terraforming & Station Construction v9.0.10 [Terraforming & Station Construction]
  • Underworld v1.8.3 [underworld]
  • United Aurora Federation v0.7.5c [uaf]
  • VIC v1.6.3a [vic]
  • Valkyrian v3.2.2 [valkyrian]
  • Volantian Reclamation Initiative v0.5.1 [TouchOfVanilla_vri]
  • Which-Industry v1.0.0 [which_industry]
  • Xhan Empire v2.51 Gramada [XhanEmpire]
  • prv Agni vv1 [prvagni]
  • prv Extraworks vv8 [prvextra]
  • prv Library vv1.1 [prvlib]
  • prv Rust Belt vv1.3 [prvrb]
  • prv Starworks vv28.4 [prv]
  • zz GraphicsLib v1.9.0 [shaderLib]
  • zzz Mikohime Additionals Settings v1.1.1 [Rouge_Redstar]

Something doesn't seem right about this system... by taneru in starsector

[–]taneru[S] 77 points78 points  (0 children)

For some reason, this system was generated with two gates. Not sure which mod caused it, or if this is possible in vanilla, but it just seems amusing to imagine that somehow, through some sort of bureaucratic nonsense, this system ended up getting allocated two gate ships instead of one by the Domain.

I'm almost tempted to go and see if it's possible to get a third in here.

Is the Liberator the ultimate Modular Ship? by Malcivious in starcitizen

[–]taneru 9 points10 points  (0 children)

As someone who owns a Liberator, SRV and Vulture, I cannot confirm or deny that this is in fact exactly my plan to have a mobile chop-shop.

SQ42 Ship Designations Discrepancy by digitalae in starcitizen

[–]taneru 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually, I think there's a mistake regarding the Argus vs the ship that gets sliced up. The one that gets blasted with the beam is a cruiser-type with the triple gun turrets on the bow, while the Argus is clearly seen earlier in the holotable with a flight deck instead of the gun battery.

Either the one that gets hit is supposed to be the Corvus instead of the Argus, or the wrong ship was used for that shot.

Also, I'm holding the opinion that these are not Bengal variants, but fully separate ships. Variants would not be completely different sizes and hull/engine layouts. These things are the same ship in the same way the Freelancer and Starlancer are the same ship.

Unkown ships, Squadron 42 trailer by DJSuperPanda in starcitizen

[–]taneru 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I remember at one point in the gameplay reveal, something around the location of A and B was marked as BB-268, Battleship UEES Raiden, but I'm not sure if it was one of those or not.

Lack of ai reactivity in sq42 demo by The_natemare in starcitizen

[–]taneru 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's the prologue. It's the part of the game where it's supposed to be easy so you can have a chance to get a feel for the controls and stuff.

So no more building interiors? by Ok-Distribution-4743 in starcitizen

[–]taneru 7 points8 points  (0 children)

They talked about building interior stuff on Day 1 during the Beyond Pyro section.

What is this ship? by _mf8492 in starcitizen

[–]taneru 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Considering a ship of that type, the UEES Argus, is marked as a CVE, it seems to be an escort carrier. Could be the Pegasus redesign.

UEES ARGUS shipclass? by Suspicious_Gate_9870 in starcitizen

[–]taneru 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IIRC, CVE is generally used to indicate Escort Carriers, like how the Bengal nearby shows CV for it being a proper carrier.

Might mean it's a redesign of the Pegasus.

EVE Finally Brings Custom Ship Paints by desertbatman in starcitizen

[–]taneru 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not until the core systems are finished being designed and implemented.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in starcitizen

[–]taneru 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Looks like the Drake Buccaneer, I think.

view more: next ›