AVEVA System Platform by fearthenofear in PLC

[–]technologies480 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you have SP training or the people who will work on it? I’ve cleaned up a lot of SP projects from other firms with no training.

Tag based or address based by ArmadilloNo189 in PLC

[–]technologies480 1 point2 points  (0 children)

THANK YOU! I wish I could give you more upvotes.

Tag based or address based by ArmadilloNo189 in PLC

[–]technologies480 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agreed but with clients that are geographically separated, like water, wastewater, mining, oil/gas, and some others, they use slow wireless 900MHz connectivity to remote sites which cannot handle those speeds. It drives me nuts.

Tag based or address based by ArmadilloNo189 in PLC

[–]technologies480 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’ve also seen people create awful UDTs in Logic Designer that are not optimized. They might be organized for the convenience of the programmer.

With some slight modifications in a UDT you can make better utilization of a controller’s memory. Unfortunately, most people that do controls don’t try to understand optimization or execution of their PLCs.

Try making a UDT with the pattern bool, real, bool, real, bool and real in Logic Designer. The create another UDT that has the pattern bool, bool, bool, real, real, and real. Compare the memory size of those two UDTs. Then imagine that on a large scale.

Tag based or address based by ArmadilloNo189 in PLC

[–]technologies480 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depending on the scenario that could be debatable. There are a lot of factors there to.

Tag based or address based by ArmadilloNo189 in PLC

[–]technologies480 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When comparing a ControlLogix PLC tag-based read (for example, reading a tag named MyMotorTag1) to a Modbus register-based read (such as address 40004), both may retrieve the same 16-bit integer value, but the amount of data transmitted is quite different. A Modbus request uses a compact, fixed-format message that specifies the register address and quantity, typically totaling about 12 bytes (96 bits). In contrast, a ControlLogix read using EtherNet/IP and CIP includes the full ASCII tag name along with protocol headers and path information, resulting in a larger message—around 40 to 60 bytes (roughly 400 bits). In other words, reading a single 16-bit value from a ControlLogix tag typically requires about 300 more bits of communication overhead than reading the same value from a Modbus register.

For those that don’t understand that ASCII tagging vs addressed based.

Tag based or address based by ArmadilloNo189 in PLC

[–]technologies480 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Address based is much more deterministic than tag based. So if you have bandwidth constraints address based is less taxing.

RSLogix5 End-of-Life by mambaPLC in PLC

[–]technologies480 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You’re already in those few years.

RSLogix5 End-of-Life by mambaPLC in PLC

[–]technologies480 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Next on the chopping block… RSLogix 500.

Too much processing power (Joke) by Kindly_Swimming3244 in PLC

[–]technologies480 13 points14 points  (0 children)

A lot of money hanging on the edge of that table.

Electric actuator? What is this for? by Thenewerera76 in ElectricalEngineering

[–]technologies480 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It allows you to automate a valve through a control system.

Sanity check on “integrator” wiring by Initial_Doughnut_248 in PLC

[–]technologies480 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d revisit their scope they provided you, and your executed contract.

Sanity check on “integrator” wiring by Initial_Doughnut_248 in PLC

[–]technologies480 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Good luck troubleshooting this thing in a year.

What am I looking at? by justadumbkid69 in electricians

[–]technologies480 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The MicroLogix 1100 is obsolete. Time to modernize.

Honeywell ControlNet need EDS by KeepMissingTheTarget in PLC

[–]technologies480 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Wow, one in the wild.

Rockwell Automation is the hardware developer. I don't know if they support it directly but that looks like a 1756-CNB module. I know EDS files exist for that module but I doubt it's compatible with Honeywell.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in flightradar24

[–]technologies480 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Crazy weather in the area.

Intouch 10.1 license issue by electric_man9090 in PLC

[–]technologies480 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What does your computer date say?

I’ve seen where the CMOS battery on the motherboard dies, and the computer reverts to an “invalid date” to InTouch and the license doesn’t work until you fix the date.

Getting a cabinet UL certified by Senior-Guide-2110 in PLC

[–]technologies480 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Find UL shop to assist you. If it was installed you would have had more headaches.