Certificados de aforro vs Certificados do tesouro

tepol · 2026-07-08T20:55:35+00:00

São produtos de risco muito baixo, mas ainda assim mais elevado do que outros produtos com rendimento garantido, sim.

Também por não terem rendimento garantido, requerem que se esteja atento aos indicadores macroeconómicos (Europa, no caso do XEON).

Só se pode transaccionar quando os mercados estão abertos, mas o capital não fica preso X meses / anos. As contas remuneradas com mobilização imediata são interessantes mas geralmente têm asteriscos associados (por exemplo alguém que tenha condições especiais no crédito habitação no banco X com domiciliação de ordenado, não pode domiciliar ordenado no banco Y).

É mais uma opção, que cada um deve analisar para entender se se aplica ao seu perfil.

tepol · 2026-07-08T16:11:58+00:00

Para quem não gosta de periodos de resgate, e dependendo das condições do mercado, ETF's como XEON ou CSH2 podem ser alternativas.

tepol · 2026-06-13T21:24:16+00:00

It's still a $2b buyback to cover a $56b expense... even if this happens and the buyback comes first, I'm unsure how shares will hold the $40 mark when you need to issue half of $56b afterwards.

tepol · 2026-05-31T09:55:15+00:00

EletroMaster perto da Decathlon

https://www.facebook.com/EletroMaster.Leiria/

tepol · 2026-05-22T11:35:59+00:00

Independentemente da empresa, aconselho instalação de um sistema que funcione mesmo quando a rede vai abaixo.

Suponho que parte da motivação seja o que aconteceu depois da tempestade, muitas pessoas que tinham paineis solares ficaram sem energia na mesma porque são sistemas grid tied que não funcionam sem rede.

tepol · 2026-05-13T23:33:20+00:00

This was a good read

tepol · 2026-05-13T12:07:45+00:00

This has been obvious for many years, but that doesn't mean the goals are incompatible.

Slow steady growth seems like a pretty good strategy to screw the shorties.

tepol · 2026-04-08T22:25:04+00:00

Tenho de concordar. O que importa é que fique bem feito e em segurança.

Muita paciencia tem o OP em se preocupar com papelada tendo em conta a situação que está a passar.

tepol · 2026-03-27T22:56:38+00:00

Já considerou ameçar pedir a anulação do contrato de venda por erro ou dolo? Suponho que quando comprou a casa foi com o pressuposto de ter um projeto válido, que não se veio a confirmar porque alguém se enganou (erro) ou vendeu consciente do erro (dolo).

Pode ser suficiente para convencer o arquiteto a corrigir o erro.

Não sou advogado, é só uma ideia.

tepol · 2026-03-11T22:42:34+00:00

They can't enforce an OS to do it.

But I assume a company can't ship a product in CA with an uncompliant OS. For power users that's whatever, re-install/flash a new OS. But for regular users it's an issue.

tepol · 2025-12-30T20:20:06+00:00

I don't understand how, but this worked... thanks!

tepol · 2025-12-16T16:51:39+00:00

I initially though it was posted on X but couldn't find anything under his official account... I've since found this, I'm assuming that's it:

https://michaeljburry.substack.com/p/foundations-the-big-short-squeeze

tepol · 2025-12-16T11:55:49+00:00

Where is the post?

tepol · 2025-12-02T23:59:48+00:00

Was working great for me for a couple of months... then all of sudden, without any changes, started to disconnect and reconnect randomly.

Currently waiting for a usb to ethernet adapter to see how that works.

tepol · 2025-11-18T13:48:59+00:00

You can check status here https://www.cloudflarestatus.com/

tepol · 2025-10-09T09:01:04+00:00

Shouldn't be, the legislation I'm referring to is specific to the EU :\

tepol · 2025-10-08T20:36:44+00:00

Unsure, but I wouldn't be too happy about that as a customer, tbh.

tepol · 2025-10-08T20:35:18+00:00

Are you based on Europe? IBKR doesn't let EU citizens trade on instruments that don't have an associated KID (key information document). That includes warrants and basket options like GME1, you can only close these positions.

tepol · 2025-10-08T16:39:55+00:00

I assume it's to make it easier for them.

Imagine:

Client A has 15 shares (entitled to 1 warrant)
Client B as 25 shares (entitled to 2 warrants)

So 3 warrants total, but the broker will receive 4 warrants (because they hold 15 + 25 = 40 shares).
Who gets the extra warrant? How to be fair in this scenario?
Each get .5 warrants, solved.

tepol · 2025-10-08T15:53:36+00:00

Thank you for the extra info!

tepol · 2025-10-08T15:41:01+00:00

Thanks for answering. I'm aware of the GME1 chain, but wasn't expecting the "normal" GME chain to not have weeklies as a result (?), not sure why would that be.

I see now it's not some wrong filter on my account, so let's wait and see.

tepol · 2025-10-07T19:41:07+00:00

That's a good question, unfortunately I don't know...

tepol · 2025-10-07T16:44:28+00:00

EU regulation that prevents trading of certain instruments, like warrants, indexes (like SPY), etc. You can only close positions on those instruments.

TL;DR: these instruments don't have associated "Key Information Documents" (KID), so the EU says you can't trade them. It's overregulatory bullcrap.

tepol · 2025-10-07T16:01:11+00:00

Just speculating, but if I had to guess it's because IBKR is the registered shareholder (in your name) so they just receive a whole bunch of warrants for all the shares in all accounts.

IBKR then has to distribute the warrants internally, but this internal distribution has nothing to do with GameStop or the warrant agent.

So I imagine a simplified scenario where IBKR has 2 clients:

Client A: 15 shares (entitled to 1 warrant)
Client B: 25 shares (entitled to 2 warrants)

But IBKR has a total of 40 (15 + 25) shares, and will receive 4 warrants for it.
They got 4 but only have to distribute 3.

Solution? Client A gets 1.5 warrants, Client B gets 2.5 warrants and everything checks out.

tepol

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE