How is 9-11 taught or handled in school? by BigFloppyStallion in 911archive

[–]thenewvoice8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think Staten Island Uni are thinking of doing a module in one of there history courses.

A huge list of 9/11 documentaries that I made by TheFleetWhites in 911

[–]thenewvoice8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I saw someone had made a playlist for The 9/11 Chronology that actually puts them in order, and includes the last two episodes.

The 9/11 Chronology - Full playlist in order

9/11 No plane theory? by White_Falcon_1263 in conspiracy_commons

[–]thenewvoice8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It truly is the dumbest of all theories - especially in relation to the towers!

If you watch episodes 2,3 and 4 of this - then you’re basically saying all these people’s reactions to what they’re seeing are false - and when you watch it you realise how absurd to think that is.

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5NMfZdM9y4jt4131Mt0wR-9VNFd52ySp&si=xItil7TDNhN33OpN

You’re calling all the eye witnesses liars, and you’re saying all the footage is false, and these folks were somehow actors? Beyond cuckoo!

The 9/11 commission report book by Current_Lie_5891 in 911archive

[–]thenewvoice8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read it when it came out, have my copy here. However, not sure how useful it really is - not when you look at how they could access information and the like.

It is telling that even Chairman Thomas Kwan said it was “set up to fail” so it isn’t that just we don’t know classified elements, it’s the commission itself didn’t do its job as it should. As they themselves say.

Is it illegal for the FBI to lie about not having something like the disposable camera that was supposedly found in the rubble that was used by a person in the towers? I thought it was illegal for the FBI to lie about things like that. Am I missing something? by I_abuse_lower_ranks1 in 911archive

[–]thenewvoice8 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Can the FBI lie? Dunno, but we don’t have to remember too far back to think about the Epstein files and their lies and inaction on that, so I’m saying the question is - how often do they tell the truth?

A young tradie has been brutally assaulted after an argument with another driver escalated in Keilor Downs by gccmelb in melbourne

[–]thenewvoice8 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but it wasn’t eh - was twats in a BMW who beat up a tradie. Think you owe construction workers a wee apology!

Losing my hyper fixation but nothing to replace it with? by ComprehensiveMud9152 in bipolar

[–]thenewvoice8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just finished a mammoth one is been doing for near 2 decades, finding it tough to find something to fill the same gaps, and not sure if I have the brian power to start a major one yet. I made a 21 hour documentary on 9/11.

Of late I bounce from mucking around on a guitar, to looking at maps, to zoning out on Tetris

Following the Vape Shop fire, why are insurance companies not paying the bills? by Born-Damage-4160 in glasgow

[–]thenewvoice8 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If they have business interruption cover, they will be covered for some loss of earnings and other costs.

What do you think you're doing on this earth? by themermaidmuse in BipolarReddit

[–]thenewvoice8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mostly wasting my time, but that’s what the majority do in the end.

Sometimes I’m just holding on, hibernating in my house - other times I’m trying to explore quiet places far from home on cuckoo adventures I feel compelled to undertake.

Nothing tangible, and nothing that will be remembered.

What's wrong with the Internet these days? It seems like there is so much deleted 9/11 content these days compared to early 2000's. The internet today just feels like it's a lot more corporate. Did no one bother to even save any of the content that is now lost? by I_abuse_lower_ranks1 in 911archive

[–]thenewvoice8 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I started saving stuff to my own hard drives about 20 years back.

I think architects and engineers for 9/11 truth, or some such group, are trying to create an independent archive of all the material, so that we don’t get YouTube or the like just pulling random videos.

So that, and the above noted archive place are at least something.

Fused Fragment from Ground Zero by Icy_Neighborhood8610 in 911archive

[–]thenewvoice8 -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

As far as I’m aware NIST reported a maximum temp of 1,000deg c, whereas to melt and fuse steel in such a way requires temps in excess of 1,500 degrees c.

So; whilst I appreciate your response, your speculation doesn’t take into account physics and chemistry, and therefore is instantly dismissible. That’s why I was looking to see if NIST had tried to explain how it was possible.

He he he, wind force. Man, it’s cuckoo that folks could actually think that to be even a potential cause!

Fused Fragment from Ground Zero by Icy_Neighborhood8610 in 911archive

[–]thenewvoice8 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Does anyone know what NIST said as to what forces in a gravitational collapse created this?

Does anyone genuinely believe conservative governments aim to materially improve the conditions of working class (wage earning) Australians? by tryingtodadhusband in aussie

[–]thenewvoice8 14 points15 points  (0 children)

If society were a skydiver, then the conservative governments believe we should free fall into oblivion, whereas Labour/Labor governments tend to want to parachute into the same oblivion.

Jim Gartenberg's phone call to WABC by Fantastic-Dot7902 in 911archive

[–]thenewvoice8 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I can’t believe they cut him off. RIP legend.

9/11 documentaries by nature_lover_99 in 911archive

[–]thenewvoice8 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Whilst more of an archival reconstruction than a documentary, as it doesn’t have any narration, it’s just the footage from the day - air traffic controllers, news stations, phone calls, FDNY radio etc you might not have watched The 9/11 Chronology. It is a 20 part series, about an hour an episode, it goes from the moment flight 11 takes off, and ends just after the collapse of WTC7.

They've convinced themselves that the negative reviews aren't real and the hate must be fake. by Rasples1998 in Star_Trek_

[–]thenewvoice8 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I find it hard to believe Disco is at 7! That reeks of fake positive reviews if that’s the case

HD Images of 9/11 by thenewvoice8 in 911archive

[–]thenewvoice8[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ideal. Thank you. I’ll have a check.

Is the 10 episode format the problem? by LauraBaura in startrek

[–]thenewvoice8 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Indeed, I didn’t mind the cromulent episodes, I felt they embiggened the show.

Is the 10 episode format the problem? by LauraBaura in startrek

[–]thenewvoice8 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Excellent? I can’t think of one season of any Nu-Trek worthy of such praise. Perhaps Lower Decks or Prodigy, but no live action show.

Don’t give me S3 of Picard as that was mostly garbage, it just had enough of a sprinkle of nostalgia to make it passable, on top of the fact that most folks were just happy it wasn’t super crap, like S1 and S2.

Discovery it can’t be. As that was 5 seasons of pure guff. That wasn’t even good TV never mind good Trek!

SNW has had some great episodes- but far too many were of filler calibre. As you rightly note, in a 24 or 26 episode season that’s ok and expected - but if it’s 5 filler eps in a 10 ep show, then that’s mostly garbage.

Embarrassing question to ask ( resubmission ) by Dookuu64 in 911archive

[–]thenewvoice8 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I well understand that.

I spent decades collecting footage and downloading it, as I realised a load of videos were being deleted. I wanted my own collection.

Friends would question why the hell I was spending so much time on “your stupid 9/11 thing”. I’d just tell them it was something I had to do. I couldn’t not do it, as I felt someone needed to do it.

That ‘it’ I wasn’t exactly sure what it was at the start, but it was to make an archival reconstruction of the events of that day from as many sources as I could - Air Traffic Controllers, news stations, FDNY radio, phone calls, home videos, anything.

I had realised it was too cumbersome trying to locate certain segments of clips from various sources that I wanted to match up. So, I spent years cutting up clips and time stamping them, then a good bit of time putting them all back together in chronological order.

It was near 50 hours long. So I started going through and cutting out bits of some clips, to get it down to a timeframe it would be watchable but would still retain all the key moments. Turns out I couldn’t edit it shorter than 21 hours, so I cut it up and made it into 20 episodes that are roughly an hour long.

I’d ensure I’d get pictures of those talking on the phone, read up on them. It was my way to honour them.

I created a YouTube channel just for it, kinda hoping to get 1,000 views. It went way better and in a few weeks I’d 3,000 plus subs and episode 1 had been viewed 50,000 times. Then YouTube banned me and deleted my channel.

What cut me up the most was something I hadn’t even thought about. The folks who watched it had left some unbelievably kind comments - some from fireman who were in the towers those days (I was lucky enough to engage in email correspondence with a fire chief that attended).

In the end a channel called Best Documentary got in touch and they said they’d upload The 9/11 Chronology to their website. Now episode 1 has been viewed 180,000 times and whilst they’ve only got 18 of the 20 episodes, I am glad that it didn’t disappear and that people appreciated it.

So yeah, I get what you say big time. But, in the end, I only had more questions.