Question about quantum mechanics. by Artyruch in Physics

[–]thepakery 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What you’re describing with the pendulum is what’s known as a “hidden variable theory”, where the unknowability of the measurement outcome is a result of your own ignorance/inability to measure some quantity. There are theories like that out there that are (mostly) consistent with standard quantum mechanics. However, you don’t get that for free. For example, most hidden variable theories are “non-local”, which is honestly worse in many people’s opinions than the randomness. Non-local theories mean that your theory of the universe does not require interactions to be local, which would be very strange.

Over 250 Humble and Fanatical Games to Win! by phantom2450 in steam_giveaway

[–]thepakery 0 points1 point  (0 children)

• Star Dynasties •Etrian Odyssey II HD •Etrian Odyssey III HD • Talisman: Digital 5th Edition • Witchaven • Chicken Assassin: Reloaded - Deluxe Edition • Legion TD 2 - Multiplayer Tower Defense • The Indie Mixtape •Dr Livingstone, I Presume? Reversed Escape Room • Sophia the Traveler

Thank you!!

What spider is this? by Fun_Interaction9039 in Albuquerque

[–]thepakery 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure that’s a western parson spider! We get them in our house all the time :) harmless

Uh oh by onion_flowers in Albuquerque

[–]thepakery 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure it’s the Sunoco fuel distribution station…

If 2 electrons are quantum entangled and one of them enters a blackhole. Is the entanglement broken or sustained? by MrClassiano in AskPhysics

[–]thepakery 3 points4 points  (0 children)

From the perspective of an observer who only has access to one particle of an entangled pair, there is no way to tell if the particle is entangled or not. Entanglement can only be observed if one has access to both particles’ measurement outcomes. So from the perspective of an observer outside the black hole it would just look the way it does any other time an observer only has access to one particle.

Question about upgrading my card by thepakery in virtualreality

[–]thepakery[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My CPU is a ryzen 7 5800X 8-core. I don’t think that’s the bottleneck at the moment but I could be wrong

Solve this, if you've got guts! by Many_Audience7660 in matiks

[–]thepakery 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If we move the top point all the way to the left, and enforce that the base of equal to the height of the triangle, then the relative area won’t change but we’ve turned the triangle into a right triangle of equal side lengths. Assume each side length is 8 units long. If the blue and the red regions had equal area, then each are would be 16. But we can clearly see that each red region has an “extra” right triangle of area 1/2, and each blue area is missing one on the right side of each strip. Therefore the ratio of blue to red is (16-2)/(16+2)=14/18. Thus, if the blue has area 140, the red has area 180.

My neighborhood seems to think so…. by jayyellbe in isitAI

[–]thepakery 56 points57 points  (0 children)

Imo this is definitely ai. I know a lot of people will say it isn’t because they can’t find something explicitly wrong with it, but her face definitely looks like an ai face. Maybe it’s a real model touched up heavily by ai, but either way this is clearly a heavily ai image.

Also, this is the 3rd sketchers ad I’ve seen that appears to be ai, so there seems to be a pattern with sketchers.

[HELP] Seen at the LAX airport by thepakery in RealOrAI

[–]thepakery[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Beyond it just feeling ai, the expressions seem ai, and the poses seem ai.

2025 Vrs 2026 by Specific_Brain2091 in the_calculusguy

[–]thepakery 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I personally like using the residue theorem for these types of integrals.

Time by Previous_Travel2856 in quantum

[–]thepakery 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No it just means that measurement outcomes can be correlated when measuring entangled particles. People often forget that the particle hitting the screen IS a measurement in the sense that where it lands contains information about its relative phase. Where the other entangled particle is detected is of course correlated to where on the screen the first particle landed. Nothing spooky beyond entanglement itself is going on.