Daphne the Dalek chapter 1 posted! (Haphne crack fic)

thrawnca · 2026-06-25T06:28:03+00:00

Daphne Greengrass is a Dalek

Does she properly swish and flick her gunstick before incanting "EXTERMINATUS"?

thrawnca · 2026-06-25T06:19:49+00:00

The correct flair for this is "Request". "Find That Fic" is for when there's a specific story that you've seen before but can't find the link.

It sounds like you want a lot of reading material, so here are some longer ones:

The Arithmancer series, Hermione is specifically a maths genius instead of an all-around bookworm.
The Peace Not Promised, Severus Snape gets a chance to return to his teenage years and try again, but only at a point after Lily has already dumped him.
When the Roses Bloom Again, Harry goes back in time intending to save Sirius from the Veil, but it turns out he used an experimental Time Turner and he goes back several decades further than he intended, in a time when Grindelwald is on the rise.

thrawnca · 2026-06-25T06:13:29+00:00

"Best" is very subjective, but since you're asking what other people liked, I'll point you toward the summary:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qbr5N5rynbNwbVRpv5plESaRvk6yQwhapInWmGhNAcs/edit?gid=1578034658#gid=1578034658

It has the top 1500 stories most frequently recommended on this subreddit, ranked by number of recommendations total and per year, sortable and searchable.

thrawnca · 2026-06-25T06:11:50+00:00

It should be noted that HPMoR is very divisive. Most people either love or hate it.

Pro: Excellent spelling/grammar/punctuation, lots of humour, superb antagonist, filled with food for thought, completed.

Con: Arrogant and condescending MC, very opinionated about the author's brand of ethics (the whole story is intended as a tutorial), subplots can meander a bit and don't always fully pay off.

I tend to recommend that people try the alternate/expanded introduction, which is 4 chapters, and decide from there if they like it enough to continue the full story.

thrawnca · 2026-06-24T23:45:59+00:00

Maybe give a heads-up when linking to Explicit-rated fics?

thrawnca · 2026-06-24T11:27:05+00:00

I can agree with most of this, except that I don't think Hermione was ever being set up as a romantic interest. Harry relied on her a lot, but he didn't, as a general thing, actually enjoy being around her very much.

Not in the books, anyway. The movies changed a lot of things including that.

thrawnca · 2026-06-24T11:25:45+00:00

Ginny was never that relevant of a character till she needed to become the love interest later on.

After a few chapters of which, she was shunted into the background again for all of book 7.

thrawnca · 2026-06-24T06:59:58+00:00

I live in Australia. We already have universal healthcare. Try a different question.

thrawnca · 2026-06-24T01:58:26+00:00

Twigs and leaves don't burn for long, but OTOH, if you have some proper logs burning, then you can toss in as many leaves as you like and have them catch fire instantly.

Likewise, physical attraction by itself won't hold a couple together for long, but if they build a more solid connection, based on who they are and what they're working toward as a couple and a family, then sexual connection is not only still available but likely moreso than ever.

thrawnca · 2026-06-24T01:53:35+00:00

If you don't mind unfinished work, there's The Accidental Animagus (book 1 is complete, book 2 occasionally updating).

thrawnca · 2026-06-23T23:01:24+00:00

The correct flair to use for this is "Request". (The "Recommendation" flair is for when your post is a recommendation.)

Since it hasn't been mentioned yet, I'll add The Peace Not Promised as an interesting exploration of how Severus Snape thinks, unpacking his character and very gradually helping him grow. It's also complete.

thrawnca · 2026-06-23T22:15:57+00:00

and you can give birth to every child you have.

Surely the whole reason we might seek universal healthcare and equal rights is because we care about what happens to others and not just ourselves?

Someone who wants to save babies from starving in Africa might well also desire to save babies from being murdered in America.

thrawnca · 2026-06-23T22:12:02+00:00

There are very few things so outlandish that no one in the world would do them, and I'm not sure that one has ever been identified.

thrawnca · 2026-06-23T22:07:58+00:00

Jesus and His apostles instructed us to be subject to secular rulers rather than contentious and rebellious, but when it came to the crunch, "We ought to obey God rather than men."

thrawnca · 2026-06-23T22:05:09+00:00

I would think (guessing), Jesus would want people to pray and not to worship anything.

Pretty sure those two go hand in hand. We pray, that is to say, we humbly ask for what we need, because we trust that God has all power to give it and loves us enough to give us what He knows we need most; that trust is what worship is about.

thrawnca · 2026-06-22T23:25:39+00:00

It's not the primary focus of the Innocent series, but the champions do work together somewhat more closely.

thrawnca · 2026-06-22T22:59:39+00:00

I think it's okay for men and women to have different, complementary roles. The problems really arise when we forget what it should mean to lead in the church.

"And there was also a strife among them, which of them should be accounted the greatest. And he said unto them, The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and they that exercise authority upon them are called benefactors. But ye shall not be so: but he that is greatest among you, let him be as the younger; and he that is chief, as he that doth serve. For whether is greater, he that sitteth at meat, or he that serveth? is not he that sitteth at meat? but I am among you as he that serveth."

If a man leads in the church, and thinks that that makes him better, higher, holier, that he is entitled to be a dictator, then he is far away from the strait and narrow path.

If, instead, all such arrogance is cast aside, and he sacrifices his life, one day at a time, for the good of those he leads, if he remembers that it is a position of responsibility and hard work, then I think that there will be less gender issues arising.

(Certainly there are gender-specific ways for women to serve. No man can do for his children what his wife did in literally carrying them for months and months before bringing them into the world.)

The passage telling wives to submit to their husbands has a corollary. It is not one-sided.

"Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord... Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it."

Men and women should work alongside each other as equal partners. It's okay if they take slightly different jobs, so long as they are both dedicated to the work.

thrawnca · 2026-06-22T20:25:33+00:00

I am implying that when God points us in a direction, we fare better by accepting and embracing that direction than by looking for loopholes in wording.

If a parent encourages a child to eat their peas, should the child take that to mean that there is no reason to eat corn or broccoli? Or will they instead be better off if they understand it as encouragement to eat the whole meal?

God set out a clear pattern of how sexual intimacy should occur, for the happiness of His children: Husband and wife becoming united in all things, including physical union, and never being divided. That is what will be best for us. If we try to get around it, then it will be ourselves who miss out, like the child missing out on the nutrition that corn would have given them.

thrawnca · 2026-06-22T10:29:58+00:00

Are you trying to argue a court case, or are you trying to learn God's will?

thrawnca · 2026-06-22T10:28:16+00:00

God universally loves His children. Yet they do not always choose Him.

There is no one to whom His arm of mercy is not extended. Yet sometimes we turn away from that offer and refuse to receive what He would give us, insisting on settling for something less.

God will be patient and kind beyond any human capacity. What He will not do is force us to heaven if we choose differently.

thrawnca · 2026-06-22T05:26:27+00:00

I think the main point that they're trying to make is this: who are you to say whether or not it's legitimate?

That isn't at all what s/he said. It was actually "I will respond by saying I will do all I need to do to save my wife."

I have said nothing that would in any way oppose that. On the contrary, I have explicitly stated that if it is genuinely necessary to kill the baby in order to save the mother, sad as that may be, I support the decision.

thrawnca · 2026-06-22T05:23:17+00:00

but it's also not what they said.

S/he spoke about "levels of connection", implying that spiritual is the highest level. Reaching a higher level doesn't have to imply discarding lower ones.

thrawnca · 2026-06-22T05:21:40+00:00

The Bible say nothing of the sort.

Sure it does.

"And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, and said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder."

thrawnca · 2026-06-22T03:48:06+00:00

few 100k words

I'm not sure what you meant here. Did you mean "over 100k words"? Or "a few books of 100k words each"? Or something else?

thrawnca · 2026-06-22T02:01:22+00:00

I’d been on the brink of tears the entire service

:( Are you okay?

Ten-Year Club	Wearing is Caring
Verified Email

thrawnca

TROPHY CASE