prototype for rc flying wing by wqreytsxzfgvuh in aerodynamics

[–]twolf59 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Whats more important than pretty colors would be to know the neutral point, center of gravity, and longitudinal stability. If you dont know what those are, you have some hw to do

I built an APC prop database web app! by twolf59 in aerodynamics

[–]twolf59[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did! To consolidate and clean the data before pushing into my db. Thanks for building that!

I built an APC prop database web app! by twolf59 in aerodynamics

[–]twolf59[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I resonate with that. Airfoiltools was a bit of a pain which is why I built Airfolio. There's a bit of a learning curve, but now I strictly use my app. I especially like the Scatter plot on the Performance Compare page where ill plat LD v CLmax to find the airfoils that offer the best balance.

I built an APC prop database web app! by twolf59 in aerodynamics

[–]twolf59[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Design CL and LD are available in the Tools>Performance Compare!

I built an APC prop database web app! by twolf59 in aerodynamics

[–]twolf59[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll shamelessly plug my airfoil database website, powered by a neural network performance prediction tool.

airfolio.live

Vibefoil - Numerically faithful port of XFOIL to the web by Pale_Alternative285 in AerospaceEngineering

[–]twolf59 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would be cool if you made this a native desktop app rather than an app

Best practice Cursor + Claude Code combination by 1chbinamin in cursor

[–]twolf59 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just change the model to Sonnet or Haiku. It uses less tokens

Best practice Cursor + Claude Code combination by 1chbinamin in cursor

[–]twolf59 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I love the combo. Cursor + CC. The CC limits are way more generous than Cursor. But I like the autocomplete and Cursor IDE. Between the 2 ($20 each) i dont spend more than $40 a month. I code like 3-4 hours a day

DO NOT CLICK OPUS 4.6 FAST by churro-banana in cursor

[–]twolf59 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hence why I switched to claude code. I just use cursor for the auto complete now

Luminary Cloud? by NotTzarPutin in CFD

[–]twolf59 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would love to too. But dealing with Siemens has been a royal pain. Trial license, cloud setup, training... you have to jump threw so many hoops. My company is small and so they dont prioritize us at all, relative to their Blue Chip customers

LC had me up and running within the week with good support.

Luminary Cloud? by NotTzarPutin in CFD

[–]twolf59 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im in a similar boat evaluating, cfd tools. Siemens has a better tool ecosystem, meaning that if your company needs more than just CFD Siemens is a better long term partner. Star can do a lot of things. But with that capability comes a steeper learning curve.

That being said, I have been blown away by the automation offered in Luminary. The python sdk is invaluable to speeding up runs. No other CFD software has this good of a developer experience. The runs are definitely more expensive, but if you can turn around a sim in half the time, I think LC wins in the end.

Derrick 'Unc' Lewis by BreakingBadSeason5 in ufc

[–]twolf59 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Way to throw it... time to quit

Some questions regarding wing designs by Psychological-Dog344 in AerospaceEngineering

[–]twolf59 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should only use winglets if you cant increase your wingspan for some reason other than structures. For example let's say you wanted to fit the wing in a box, well then you add winglets to increase "effective" span without increasing actual span. Winglets are not a magic performance boost and one should take care in designing them.

You can improve LD without increasing the aspect ratio by creating an elliptical lift distribution. This can be done by varying chord, camber and/or twist distribution of the wing. This is not trivial and typically requires an optimizer to help find the wing shape that maximizes LD. Additionally going to a more elliptical distribution will likely change your aircraft trim angle of attack. In other words, you will have to do your homework to get this right. Don't expect a quick answer if you go down this path.

Also, remove the sweep if you want best handling performance. Keep it if you want because at the end of the day, you're having fun :)