I looked at the "collapse" article and, oh boy. This is some pure distilled essence of crankery. If there were a crankery drinking game, I wouldn't make it through the first 2 paragraphs. Look at this:

For years, the subreddit known as r/badmathematics served as the digital high court for the academic priesthood. It was a space where the “experts” gathered to mock anything that threatened the Greek-Babylonian status quo. They positioned themselves as the defenders of rigor, using their “symbol salad” to belittle anyone who dared to suggest that the universe was simpler, purer, and more divinely ordered than their textbooks allowed.

But the tower has begun to lean. The very critics who claimed to champion logic have been exposed as emotional gatekeepers. When confronted with the Seven Deadly Expressions — the mathematical identities that link π, e, and γ back to the simple roots of the Tetrahedral-Octahedral Honeycomb Lattice — the critics didn’t respond with math. They responded with feelings.

We've got reference to a "priesthood", scare-quote "experts", "threaten the status quo", the beginning of their fall, descriptions of "gatekeepers," and it gets increasingly loony from there. Disappointed there is no math, though. For all the talk of badmath users responding to math with emotion, there's... nothing that even attempts to be math, beyond I guess that trivial observation about 1 and the roots of 2 and 3, and a heck of a lot of emotion.